by Squids » Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:56 am
by Johno6 » Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:57 am
by Squids » Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:58 am
Johno6 wrote:so now your are implying that lance armstrongs team mates have killed someone?
id be careful with those kind of accusations mate.
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Oct 25, 2012 12:01 pm
Squids wrote:Assume there are 10 men in the room, 9 are known murderers, 1 the police are unsure.
The 9 men after offered more lenient sentences if they rat out the 1 guy the police are unsure about.
I think everyone knows what will happen....sounds familiar.
by am Bays » Thu Oct 25, 2012 12:17 pm
Squids wrote:Johno6 wrote:so now your are implying that lance armstrongs team mates have killed someone?
id be careful with those kind of accusations mate.
Clown. Tell me I'm wrong.
Lance is innocent, it is a conspiracy.
by scoob » Thu Oct 25, 2012 12:41 pm
am Bays wrote:Squids wrote:Johno6 wrote:so now your are implying that lance armstrongs team mates have killed someone?
id be careful with those kind of accusations mate.
Clown. Tell me I'm wrong.
Lance is innocent, it is a conspiracy.
Nice avatar Squids, taken at the bottom of Alpe D'Huez in 2001, Lance went up in 38:01, Ullrich in 40:00. Both a good 90 s faster than the fastest time up it in 2011.
by Grahaml » Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:16 pm
by Squids » Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:40 pm
am Bays wrote:Squids wrote:Johno6 wrote:so now your are implying that lance armstrongs team mates have killed someone?
id be careful with those kind of accusations mate.
Clown. Tell me I'm wrong.
Lance is innocent, it is a conspiracy.
Nice avatar Squids, taken at the bottom of Alpe D'Huez in 2001, Lance went up in 38:01, Ullrich in 40:00. Both a good 90 s faster than the fastest time up it in 2011.
by Footy Chick » Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:42 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Oct 25, 2012 3:20 pm
by dedja » Thu Oct 25, 2012 3:59 pm
by cheetah » Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:57 pm
by cheetah » Thu Oct 25, 2012 5:01 pm
by Grahaml » Thu Oct 25, 2012 5:02 pm
Footy Chick wrote:THis is such a hard one.
Why I don't necessarily believe he never took drugs, I do believe that one is innocent until proven guilty.
He has never been caught and everything that has gone on over the last couple of weeks is based on heresay and circumstancial evidence. Ie; he said/she said.
Given that, it has become apparent that part of Armstrong charities was funding the UCI - did they know all along and swept it under the carpet because of his contributions? and now they've stopped they've blown him out of the water with 1000 pages of heresay?
They are just as guilty if that's the case.
by BigFatHarry » Thu Oct 25, 2012 5:18 pm
by cheetah » Thu Oct 25, 2012 6:01 pm
BigFatHarry wrote:With the current media s storm, this thread should be renamed; "Lance Armstrong biggest disgrace since the Crows".
by dedja » Tue Oct 30, 2012 6:10 pm
by mickey » Tue Oct 30, 2012 6:41 pm
dedja wrote:LOL, the Adelaide City Council has just stripped Lance of the keys to the city.
Jeez, Lance must be quaking in his boots ...
by dedja » Sun Nov 11, 2012 12:01 am
by Squids » Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:37 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |