dedja wrote:LOL, the dividend is supposed to 80% of profits ... has Port EVER paid a dividend to the SANFL?
Yawn. The dividend hasnt been that setup for over a decade. Both clubs pay a set dividend to the sanfl, year in, year out, profit or loss
by Macca19 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 8:14 pm
dedja wrote:LOL, the dividend is supposed to 80% of profits ... has Port EVER paid a dividend to the SANFL?
by Macca19 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 8:18 pm
Barto wrote:Which still wouldn't cover costs considering the poor crowds.
by topsywaldron » Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:00 am
Macca19 wrote:Given that the sanfl take all match day catering, all match day car parking and all match day advertising revenue, id say its probably not far off that the sanfl would take 80% of match day revenue from port games.
by UK Fan » Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:29 am
topsywaldron wrote:Macca19 wrote:Given that the sanfl take all match day catering, all match day car parking and all match day advertising revenue, id say its probably not far off that the sanfl would take 80% of match day revenue from port games.
And if Beenreal had said that I might have agreed, instead he made the claim the SANFL took 80% of all PAFC revenue. And i'm the one out of my depth? Laughable.
On Beenreals's claim I hope the SANFL have generated and sent to Alberton a $3.6M invoice for the Renault sponsorship.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Barto » Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:03 pm
UK Fan wrote:
Why were 2 afl clubs in sa invented by sanfl ??? Revenue maybe
by RustyCage » Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:09 pm
Macca19 wrote:dedja wrote:LOL, the dividend is supposed to 80% of profits ... has Port EVER paid a dividend to the SANFL?
Yawn. The dividend hasnt been that setup for over a decade. Both clubs pay a set dividend to the sanfl, year in, year out, profit or loss
by RustyCage » Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:11 pm
by topsywaldron » Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:22 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Exactly, when people play the "port have never given a dividend back to the SANFL" card, you can ignore everything else they say as they have proven they have no idea
by UK Fan » Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:47 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Wrong UK Fan, only one SA's two AFL teams were invented by the SANFL
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by RustyCage » Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:05 pm
UK Fan wrote:pafc1870 wrote:Wrong UK Fan, only one SA's two AFL teams were invented by the SANFL
Wrong again nugget !!!
If u r going to correct people try a thing called research you mallard duck!!
by Brodlach » Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:08 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Big Phil » Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:31 pm
Brodlach wrote:Did Newton start on the middle?
by UK Fan » Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:39 pm
pafc1870 wrote:UK Fan wrote:pafc1870 wrote:Wrong UK Fan, only one SA's two AFL teams were invented by the SANFL
Wrong again nugget !!!
If u r going to correct people try a thing called research you mallard duck!!
So the SANFL "created" the Power?
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Brodlach » Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:49 pm
Big Phil wrote:Brodlach wrote:Did Newton start on the middle?
Yep, not really seen the ball much. Rotated off the bench as well. 5 touched to half time...
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by topsywaldron » Sun Mar 17, 2013 7:09 pm
by SDK » Sun Mar 17, 2013 7:31 pm
by Dutchy » Sun Mar 17, 2013 9:16 pm
by Mr Beefy » Sun Mar 17, 2013 9:49 pm
UK Fan wrote:pafc1870 wrote:UK Fan wrote:pafc1870 wrote:Wrong UK Fan, only one SA's two AFL teams were invented by the SANFL
Wrong again nugget !!!
If u r going to correct people try a thing called research you mallard duck!!
So the SANFL "created" the Power?
Yes
What's your theory on how you gained an afl licence osmosis ??? Please explain how the sanfl invented the crows but not the power.
If we didn't invent you. Why do you need to pay us for your independence. Wafl doesn't own freo ???
by Barto » Sun Mar 17, 2013 10:37 pm
by JamesH » Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:14 am
Dutchy wrote:We saw it with Salopek last year, now with Newton, link to article below -
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6595950375
Quite obvious Port Magpies are being used as a "One Club" Reserves team, a completely unnecessary knee jerk reaction from the team selection in the first trial game of the year FFS!
A quote from the article -
"I was asked by Daniel Healy would I guarantee Ben a game all year and I said `I don't guarantee any player a game'. And he said `well, we can'," Collins said.
then mentioned with Hinkley on 5AA tonight and he said "Westies wouldnt play him where we wanted so now he is at the Magpies and we can play him where we want"
How about letting the lad play at West and win his own way into the midfield? and if unhappy transfer him later in the year?
The whole thing stinks and is exactly why we dont want reserves teams in our comp.
A question for the Magpie fans though, how do you feel that there will be guys getting games in your league team that dont deserve their selection and/or are played out of postion that is best for their team to succeed?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |