Big Phil wrote:stampy wrote:the sebatron is shite
Well, he did play some League footy at The Bay, Stampy, so this must be true?!!
He was ok - stats had him with 40 hitouts to James Craig 21?
Big Phil wrote:stampy wrote:the sebatron is shite
Well, he did play some League footy at The Bay, Stampy, so this must be true?!!
on the rails wrote:wild dog wrote:Mate if that is part of your negative, you must live a happy life. Possibly the club thought providing the FREE secure parking in excess of 1 hour prior to the game was excessive.
What is the actual point of your response? If you are offering free car parking for a SANFL game then have it open at least at the start of the reserves or state a time when it is open from! How hard is it to open gates which clearly is an issue at Elizabeth given my other complaint re the Oval Gates to exit at the end of the game? Great innovation free "security" parking but poorly managed!
Apachebulldog wrote:Well done Cocks beaten by a more experienced side however not a bad effort by the Dogs considering they had SEVEN first game and second game players they can only improve as the season progresses when they will gel and have more league games under their belts it will be a tough ask for these boys again next Saturday night against the Legs and also for the rest of the year but i will be there.
whufc wrote:Well done North easily to good on the night, was glad to see Chad playing league football again but i do fear the extra pace in league games compared to trial games/reserves footy caught him out again.
Alright im not going to be very popular with this view but so be it. The squad we have imho is still capable of pushing for the top 3 or at very least making the 5 BUT at the moment i think the coaching commitee are coaching and selecting very poorly at the minute.
North kicked 6 goals in 13 minutes in the second quarter. 10 of those minutes Hardy was rucking, enough said on that topic get two ruckmen in ASAP plain and simple.
We cant continue to play Reichart, Prior, Waldhutter, Haydon all in the same defence as 'undersized' defenders. They all lack pace (Waldutter the slight exception), they are all average with the ball in hand and are all playing on opponents much bigger and stronger.
Why Waldhutter is taking our kick ins is beyond me, i love everything he does on a football field except kick the ball. He is probably the worse kick in the league side yet is taking the kick ins. Two North goals in the second resulted directly from his kick ins. That has to change immediately.
The same as last year us kicking a point = opposition taking a mark on their half forward flank within 2 kicks 2 handballs. We must have our setups all wrong we terrible at this last year and we are even worse this year.
We still lack the pace the exact same as last year, i didnt see the ressies yesterday (cant imagine to many played well looking at the score) but we need to get the likes of Barmby, Edmead, S.Milne into the side and inject some pace.
The final worry is the discipline of our experienced players. Last week it was Thommo giving away an early stupid 'after disposal' free, this week it was Obst. Its going to be hard enough as is, we need these bloke giving away stupid uneccassary down the grounds.
The only resaon im dissapointed is i still believe we have enough talent there, we just need to get back to basics and a couple of suttle selection and structural changes could see us performing very well.
Sorry for boring you. run, duck and cover now.
cennals05 wrote:I am not disappointed at all in how we have played the last couple of weeks. We have lost a lot of experience and are clearly rebuilding. We should be thankful for the last 13 years. It is something no other club has done. Now we get to see the next bunch of kids coming through. I'm excited by what I have seen from some of them. Unlike last year our effort is certainly there. We are just lacking in a couple of areas.
Last nights game showed that we didn't make any mistakes in getting rid of Chad or Westhoff.
whufc wrote:cennals05 wrote:HB: Goodrem/Thomas/Symes- Collier- Barmby
B: Waldhutter/Reichart- Hardy- Nash
twosheds wrote:Not at all WHUFC , personally I agree with most of what you said, it's a shame some on the CDFC forum can't be as constructive or analytical as you - knee jerk vitriol is not what we need from "supporters"
Mr Butterworth wrote:How did Trent Melville go for north reserves?
Groucho wrote:Apostle
Why do you have a Redlegs avatar? I'm confused. Has someone cast an evil spell on you or have you lost a bet?
whufc wrote:North kicked 6 goals in 13 minutes in the second quarter. 10 of those minutes Hardy was rucking, enough said on that topic get two ruckmen in ASAP plain and simple.
whufc wrote:ONFIELD
-change in structure all of a sudden 2 specialist ruckmen is forbidden
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 296 guests