by afc9798 » Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:56 am
by lion heart » Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:04 pm
shoe boy wrote:lion heart wrote:fathersonsfl wrote:Well done to the SAAFL. They have shown both common sense and had the balls to make a decision. SFL hierarchy please take note.
The SAAFL have taken 2 weeks to make a clear decision which is in the competitions best interest's, meanwhile the SFL has sat on its hands for 12 years and counting.What happened to the future directions committee, have any decent recommendations or options come from the findings? Of course not and i wonder why..... What else did we expect when a driving force behind 1 division was put in charge of the FDC 12 years later? Did we expect or want any different or was the FDC simply put together to quell the masses? Why did we not look for some outside perspective - what a novel idea that would have been.
As a person who loves my club and the SFL i find this infuriating. The SFL has stagnated while other leagues move forward. 15 years ago the SFL was the premier league in S.A. and now we are a long long way behind GSFL and a few others.
It is blatantly obvious some heads need to roll within the SFL 'boys club' in order for some action to take place. It may seem harsh to tap a long serving member on the shoulder but if they are affecting the health of our competition tough decisions must be made. The SFL unquestionably has some great members but it's time to clear the dead wood and look toward the future with a clear and concise plan in place. It is by no means an easy job, but the leagues existence depends on it. Stop the rot and make it happen.
by Turbo » Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:42 pm
by Look Good In Leather » Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:49 pm
lion heart wrote:fathersonsfl wrote:Well done to the SAAFL. They have shown both common sense and had the balls to make a decision. SFL hierarchy please take note.
The SAAFL have taken 2 weeks to make a clear decision which is in the competitions best interest's, meanwhile the SFL has sat on its hands for 12 years and counting.What happened to the future directions committee, have any decent recommendations or options come from the findings? Of course not and i wonder why..... What else did we expect when a driving force behind 1 division was put in charge of the FDC 12 years later? Did we expect or want any different or was the FDC simply put together to quell the masses? Why did we not look for some outside perspective - what a novel idea that would have been.
As a person who loves my club and the SFL i find this infuriating. The SFL has stagnated while other leagues move forward. 15 years ago the SFL was the premier league in S.A. and now we are a long long way behind GSFL and a few others.
It is blatantly obvious some heads need to roll within the SFL 'boys club' in order for some action to take place. It may seem harsh to tap a long serving member on the shoulder but if they are affecting the health of our competition tough decisions must be made. The SFL unquestionably has some great members but it's time to clear the dead wood and look toward the future with a clear and concise plan in place. It is by no means an easy job, but the leagues existence depends on it. Stop the rot and make it happen.
by fathersonsfl » Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:12 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:lion heart wrote:fathersonsfl wrote:Well done to the SAAFL. They have shown both common sense and had the balls to make a decision. SFL hierarchy please take note.
The SAAFL have taken 2 weeks to make a clear decision which is in the competitions best interest's, meanwhile the SFL has sat on its hands for 12 years and counting.What happened to the future directions committee, have any decent recommendations or options come from the findings? Of course not and i wonder why..... What else did we expect when a driving force behind 1 division was put in charge of the FDC 12 years later? Did we expect or want any different or was the FDC simply put together to quell the masses? Why did we not look for some outside perspective - what a novel idea that would have been.
As a person who loves my club and the SFL i find this infuriating. The SFL has stagnated while other leagues move forward. 15 years ago the SFL was the premier league in S.A. and now we are a long long way behind GSFL and a few others.
It is blatantly obvious some heads need to roll within the SFL 'boys club' in order for some action to take place. It may seem harsh to tap a long serving member on the shoulder but if they are affecting the health of our competition tough decisions must be made. The SFL unquestionably has some great members but it's time to clear the dead wood and look toward the future with a clear and concise plan in place. It is by no means an easy job, but the leagues existence depends on it. Stop the rot and make it happen.
Shuffling a couple of C-Grade teams around is hardly tough decision making
by Esteban Vihaio » Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:36 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:lion heart wrote:fathersonsfl wrote:Well done to the SAAFL. They have shown both common sense and had the balls to make a decision. SFL hierarchy please take note.
The SAAFL have taken 2 weeks to make a clear decision which is in the competitions best interest's, meanwhile the SFL has sat on its hands for 12 years and counting.What happened to the future directions committee, have any decent recommendations or options come from the findings? Of course not and i wonder why..... What else did we expect when a driving force behind 1 division was put in charge of the FDC 12 years later? Did we expect or want any different or was the FDC simply put together to quell the masses? Why did we not look for some outside perspective - what a novel idea that would have been.
As a person who loves my club and the SFL i find this infuriating. The SFL has stagnated while other leagues move forward. 15 years ago the SFL was the premier league in S.A. and now we are a long long way behind GSFL and a few others.
It is blatantly obvious some heads need to roll within the SFL 'boys club' in order for some action to take place. It may seem harsh to tap a long serving member on the shoulder but if they are affecting the health of our competition tough decisions must be made. The SFL unquestionably has some great members but it's time to clear the dead wood and look toward the future with a clear and concise plan in place. It is by no means an easy job, but the leagues existence depends on it. Stop the rot and make it happen.
Shuffling a couple of C-Grade teams around is hardly tough decision making
by heater31 » Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:41 pm
Esteban Vihaio wrote:
Div 6 is actually an A and B grade competition. 8 clubs in Div 6 fielded their A+B and Adelaide Uni fielded their C+D grade. TTG were promoted from Div 7, which is also an A+B grade division. Last year TTG fielded both C+D grades but have experienced significant issues which has resulted in the aforementioned issues. It's hardly just shuffling around some C grade sides.![]()
Fact: SAAFL made a decision after two rounds for 47 goal defeats.
by Front & Centre » Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:02 pm
by afc9798 » Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:09 pm
Front & Centre wrote:heard a rumour SFL were going to modify Sunday 16s competition to a 15 a side teams - anyone else heard about this?
Talk about bending over backwards for the sake of 2 clubs
by afc9798 » Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:11 pm
vics01 wrote:Hawks v emus. Hawks by 10
by MZ » Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:15 pm
Front & Centre wrote:heard a rumour SFL were going to modify Sunday 16s competition to a 15 a side teams - anyone else heard about this?
Talk about bending over backwards for the sake of 2 clubs
by lion heart » Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:16 pm
afc9798 wrote:Front & Centre wrote:heard a rumour SFL were going to modify Sunday 16s competition to a 15 a side teams - anyone else heard about this?
Talk about bending over backwards for the sake of 2 clubs
Really? What next C Grade to be 7 a side with an annual tournament in Hong Kong?
How many concessions are they going to make to appease the minority, whilst ignoring the issues of the majority..
by Look Good In Leather » Thu Apr 18, 2013 5:20 pm
fathersonsfl wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:lion heart wrote:fathersonsfl wrote:Well done to the SAAFL. They have shown both common sense and had the balls to make a decision. SFL hierarchy please take note.
The SAAFL have taken 2 weeks to make a clear decision which is in the competitions best interest's, meanwhile the SFL has sat on its hands for 12 years and counting.What happened to the future directions committee, have any decent recommendations or options come from the findings? Of course not and i wonder why..... What else did we expect when a driving force behind 1 division was put in charge of the FDC 12 years later? Did we expect or want any different or was the FDC simply put together to quell the masses? Why did we not look for some outside perspective - what a novel idea that would have been.
As a person who loves my club and the SFL i find this infuriating. The SFL has stagnated while other leagues move forward. 15 years ago the SFL was the premier league in S.A. and now we are a long long way behind GSFL and a few others.
It is blatantly obvious some heads need to roll within the SFL 'boys club' in order for some action to take place. It may seem harsh to tap a long serving member on the shoulder but if they are affecting the health of our competition tough decisions must be made. The SFL unquestionably has some great members but it's time to clear the dead wood and look toward the future with a clear and concise plan in place. It is by no means an easy job, but the leagues existence depends on it. Stop the rot and make it happen.
Shuffling a couple of C-Grade teams around is hardly tough decision making
I think it is a pretty tough decision (and good one) to make after the season had already started.
by Look Good In Leather » Thu Apr 18, 2013 5:24 pm
Esteban Vihaio wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:lion heart wrote:fathersonsfl wrote:Well done to the SAAFL. They have shown both common sense and had the balls to make a decision. SFL hierarchy please take note.
The SAAFL have taken 2 weeks to make a clear decision which is in the competitions best interest's, meanwhile the SFL has sat on its hands for 12 years and counting.What happened to the future directions committee, have any decent recommendations or options come from the findings? Of course not and i wonder why..... What else did we expect when a driving force behind 1 division was put in charge of the FDC 12 years later? Did we expect or want any different or was the FDC simply put together to quell the masses? Why did we not look for some outside perspective - what a novel idea that would have been.
As a person who loves my club and the SFL i find this infuriating. The SFL has stagnated while other leagues move forward. 15 years ago the SFL was the premier league in S.A. and now we are a long long way behind GSFL and a few others.
It is blatantly obvious some heads need to roll within the SFL 'boys club' in order for some action to take place. It may seem harsh to tap a long serving member on the shoulder but if they are affecting the health of our competition tough decisions must be made. The SFL unquestionably has some great members but it's time to clear the dead wood and look toward the future with a clear and concise plan in place. It is by no means an easy job, but the leagues existence depends on it. Stop the rot and make it happen.
Shuffling a couple of C-Grade teams around is hardly tough decision making
Div 6 is actually an A and B grade competition. 8 clubs in Div 6 fielded their A+B and Adelaide Uni fielded their C+D grade. TTG were promoted from Div 7, which is also an A+B grade division. Last year TTG fielded both C+D grades but have experienced significant issues which has resulted in the aforementioned issues. It's hardly just shuffling around some C grade sides.![]()
Fact: SAAFL made a decision after two rounds for 47 goal defeats.
by shoe boy » Thu Apr 18, 2013 5:32 pm
MZ wrote:Front & Centre wrote:heard a rumour SFL were going to modify Sunday 16s competition to a 15 a side teams - anyone else heard about this?
Talk about bending over backwards for the sake of 2 clubs
Shouldn't that read for the sake of 50 kids?
Are you suggesting the SFL abandon those 50 kids in 2013 and not afford them a regular club game?
by Oldman Munga » Thu Apr 18, 2013 5:43 pm
shoe boy wrote:MZ wrote:Front & Centre wrote:heard a rumour SFL were going to modify Sunday 16s competition to a 15 a side teams - anyone else heard about this?
Talk about bending over backwards for the sake of 2 clubs
Shouldn't that read for the sake of 50 kids?
Are you suggesting the SFL abandon those 50 kids in 2013 and not afford them a regular club game?
NO they play for the college!!! If they can play at 9-50 on SAT MORNING they are more than welcome!!!!
by Esteban Vihaio » Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:59 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:
A C-Grade team got moved from one division to another, that is exactly what happened!
Anyhow, any comp that has C-Grade teams playing against A-Grade teams cannot be taken seriously, we saw the debacle that occurred when we had that happening in our comp 15 -16 years ago. IMHO a significant factor to the collapse of Div 2 and the situation we have today.
by vics01 » Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:09 pm
by woodublieve12 » Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:26 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:A C-Grade team got moved from one division to another, that is exactly what happened!
Anyhow, any comp that has C-Grade teams playing against A-Grade teams cannot be taken seriously, we saw the debacle that occurred when we had that happening in our comp 15 -16 years ago. IMHO a significant factor to the collapse of Div 2 and the situation we have today.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |