Adelaide Plains Football League

[Kcco]

I heard Two wells got up over hamley by about 10 goals! Apparently mighty hounds gave nocyrils a bath too!!

different ends of the ground bone head. Two wells were very good today. they were hungry. hamley played like absolute spuds. probably the lost we needed. i think we will enjoy the rest. mighty hounds did play a solid game. dont no if hamley even had a forward that played today

Was a good game, about time two wells showed some passion and fight to play glimpses of how try finished off last year, still a bit of the year to go yet, and 1 week is a long time in footy things can go either way for any teams yet, some teams will have to fight to make the 4 probably two wells in that catagory of teams. While other teams can afford a loss. Don't take much away from the game two wells have been up and down never know when they're gonna rock up and play footy, and hamely are a pretty good side this year, will bounce back next week.

[Nighthawk]

Tee hee. Mighty hounds haha

[GIDDY UP!]

A closer game then many people expected yesterday between United and Virginia. Anyone got any info about the game?

[norm11]

Hamley reserves beat two wells.

[magpieeagle]

Hamley reserves beat two wells.

Don't forget your junior colts there norm!!

[-Outsider-]

Is it true Les Pearson has taken the time from the bye to head home and weigh up his future? Pretty big loss if true..

[norm11]

Hamley reserves beat two wells.

Don't forget your junior colts there norm!!

Yes two big wins there

[roodog]

The Roosters were way hungrier than Hamley and you could see it early on. They used the switch across the ground very well and it seemed Hamley's wingers were spending all their time trying to zone loose players. If it weren't for Zanandrea, the Bombers would have lost by more - he was brilliant off half back. For Two Wells, Feast was magnificent, giving his side first use at nearly every stoppage he was involved in and kicking a couple of goals as well. Feast's dominance and Hamley's lack of accountability allowed those Rooster outriders to be fed beautifully. Some thinking to be done for the Bomber coaching staff......

[happyhawk]

Schahinger a chance of being back at the bridge in the next few weeks??

[Nocyrils]

The Roosters were way hungrier than Hamley and you could see it early on. They used the switch across the ground very well and it seemed Hamley's wingers were spending all their time trying to zone loose players. If it weren't for Zanandrea, the Bombers would have lost by more - he was brilliant off half back. For Two Wells, Feast was magnificent, giving his side first use at nearly every stoppage he was involved in and kicking a couple of goals as well. Feast's dominance and Hamley's lack of accountability allowed those Rooster outriders to be fed beautifully. Some thinking to be done for the Bomber coaching staff......

To many blokes wanting to play injured just for the coin. some people will not like that comment but its fact. Tell me why hamley never seem to tag opposition damaging players. opposition teams dont hesitate to tag out hamleys damaging players so why do we let blokes like cicollela , ned secifien . j montgomery etc run around at there own will. or is it a case of hamley players worried about individual performance rather then accountability.

[OnSong]

Errr. This is awkward

[Swamp Donkey]

Schahinger a chance of being back at the bridge in the next few weeks??

I'm hearing Luke McCabe will play his 3 games before business time begins in Sept.

[OnSong]

Is it true Les Pearson has taken the time from the bye to head home and weigh up his future? Pretty big loss if true..

Not true. Went back to visit family and watch a good mate play but was deserted for a game of cards.

[jumbo]

The Roosters were way hungrier than Hamley and you could see it early on. They used the switch across the ground very well and it seemed Hamley's wingers were spending all their time trying to zone loose players. If it weren't for Zanandrea, the Bombers would have lost by more - he was brilliant off half back. For Two Wells, Feast was magnificent, giving his side first use at nearly every stoppage he was involved in and kicking a couple of goals as well. Feast's dominance and Hamley's lack of accountability allowed those Rooster outriders to be fed beautifully. Some thinking to be done for the Bomber coaching staff......

To many blokes wanting to play injured just for the coin. some people will not like that comment but its fact. Tell me why hamley never seem to tag opposition damaging players. opposition teams dont hesitate to tag out hamleys damaging players so why do we let blokes like cicollela , ned secifien . j montgomery etc run around at there own will. or is it a case of hamley players worried about individual performance rather then accountability.

Probably a question for your match committee I would think. If your players are given a task and don't do as required, why are they still playing? Or are they not given a task?

[Nocyrils]

The Roosters were way hungrier than Hamley and you could see it early on. They used the switch across the ground very well and it seemed Hamley's wingers were spending all their time trying to zone loose players. If it weren't for Zanandrea, the Bombers would have lost by more - he was brilliant off half back. For Two Wells, Feast was magnificent, giving his side first use at nearly every stoppage he was involved in and kicking a couple of goals as well. Feast's dominance and Hamley's lack of accountability allowed those Rooster outriders to be fed beautifully. Some thinking to be done for the Bomber coaching staff......

To many blokes wanting to play injured just for the coin. some people will not like that comment but its fact. Tell me why hamley never seem to tag opposition damaging players. opposition teams dont hesitate to tag out hamleys damaging players so why do we let blokes like cicollela , ned secifien . j montgomery etc run around at there own will. or is it a case of hamley players worried about individual performance rather then accountability.

Probably a question for your match committee I would think. If your players are given a task and don't do as required, why are they still playing? Or are they not given a task?

apparently game plans dont win matches . instead hamley would rather kick down the line or bomb it to a contest where there happens to be a two on 1 in favour of opposition team and one of them being feast on several occasions . Many of chances on saturday to switch the ball and open up the game but ignored everytime. is it bad coaching or blokes not using their footy brains. or just a lack of confidence to hit the target. I have no doubt hamley will bounce back. its the kick up the ass they needed.

[OnSong]

The Roosters were way hungrier than Hamley and you could see it early on. They used the switch across the ground very well and it seemed Hamley's wingers were spending all their time trying to zone loose players. If it weren't for Zanandrea, the Bombers would have lost by more - he was brilliant off half back. For Two Wells, Feast was magnificent, giving his side first use at nearly every stoppage he was involved in and kicking a couple of goals as well. Feast's dominance and Hamley's lack of accountability allowed those Rooster outriders to be fed beautifully. Some thinking to be done for the Bomber coaching staff......

To many blokes wanting to play injured just for the coin. some people will not like that comment but its fact. Tell me why hamley never seem to tag opposition damaging players. opposition teams dont hesitate to tag out hamleys damaging players so why do we let blokes like cicollela , ned secifien . j montgomery etc run around at there own will. or is it a case of hamley players worried about individual performance rather then accountability.

Probably a question for your match committee I would think. If your players are given a task and don't do as required, why are they still playing? Or are they not given a task?

apparently game plans dont win matches . instead hamley would rather kick down the line or bomb it to a contest where there happens to be a two on 1 in favour of opposition team and one of them being feast on several occasions . Many of chances on saturday to switch the ball and open up the game but ignored everytime. is it bad coaching or blokes not using their footy brains. or just a lack of confidence to hit the target. I have no doubt hamley will bounce back. its the kick up the ass they needed.

Did the leaders in the team make such suggestions?

[Nocyrils]

one of the leaders is constantly suggesting the switch to open up the game. tough message to get through lets just say will enjoy 2 weeks off

[roodog]

The Roosters were way hungrier than Hamley and you could see it early on. They used the switch across the ground very well and it seemed Hamley's wingers were spending all their time trying to zone loose players. If it weren't for Zanandrea, the Bombers would have lost by more - he was brilliant off half back. For Two Wells, Feast was magnificent, giving his side first use at nearly every stoppage he was involved in and kicking a couple of goals as well. Feast's dominance and Hamley's lack of accountability allowed those Rooster outriders to be fed beautifully. Some thinking to be done for the Bomber coaching staff......

To many blokes wanting to play injured just for the coin. some people will not like that comment but its fact. Tell me why hamley never seem to tag opposition damaging players. opposition teams dont hesitate to tag out hamleys damaging players so why do we let blokes like cicollela , ned secifien . j montgomery etc run around at there own will. or is it a case of hamley players worried about individual performance rather then accountability.

Probably a question for your match committee I would think. If your players are given a task and don't do as required, why are they still playing? Or are they not given a task?

apparently game plans dont win matches . instead hamley would rather kick down the line or bomb it to a contest where there happens to be a two on 1 in favour of opposition team and one of them being feast on several occasions . Many of chances on saturday to switch the ball and open up the game but ignored everytime. is it bad coaching or blokes not using their footy brains. or just a lack of confidence to hit the target. I have no doubt hamley will bounce back. its the kick up the ass they needed.

Hallelujah! You've nailed it all right there Cyrils. It's happened numerous times before and you can get away with it against the lesser teams, but against Two Wells on the weekend, and Mallala prior, you won't get away with banging it down the line. The number of times I've seen Rhys Darwin, Lachy Norman or Stewie Gregory get ignored when out in a paddock is concerning. Good sides will honour the leads of their team mates and that's what the Roosters and Magpies do. I also have no doubt Hamley will bounce back, but a few blokes will have start playing playing honest, team footy

[OnSong]

Team performances had been pretty consistent from Hamley in the past 10 weeks or so....

[happyhawk]

Schahinger a chance of being back at the bridge in the next few weeks??

I'm hearing Luke McCabe will play his 3 games before business time begins in Sept.

Amazing what the lure of finals can do. McCabe would still be one of the fittest in the comp if he played, the blokes a freak.