SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
- Ian
- Moderator
- Posts: 11443
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:55 pm
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Essendon
- Team: Lockleys
- Has thanked: 312 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
- Contact:
SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
I couldn't be bothered typing the whole article, but here's the short version, cant say I agree with much of it (do agree with some though).
1. Norwood "the elevated stand on the wing gives a great vantage point of the whole field, making the footy easy to follow."
2. Glenelg "the footy is easy to follow, mainly because the Bay is a small ground-the SANFL's SCG perhaps."
3. Woodville
4. Unley "both grounds (Woodville & Unley) have great surroundings and aside from the fact that you are at the ground for the footy, both parks are great places to be with or without the footy."
5. Prospect
6. Alberton
7. Elizabeth
8. Richmond "West's home ground is quite similar to South Adelaide, but with slightly more bearable temperatures. .................The biggest dissaspointment about Richmond oval is their dodgy digital clock...........get your act together Westies, or you'll be venue wooden spooner.
That honour currently belongs to South."
9. Noarlunga
1. Norwood "the elevated stand on the wing gives a great vantage point of the whole field, making the footy easy to follow."
2. Glenelg "the footy is easy to follow, mainly because the Bay is a small ground-the SANFL's SCG perhaps."
3. Woodville
4. Unley "both grounds (Woodville & Unley) have great surroundings and aside from the fact that you are at the ground for the footy, both parks are great places to be with or without the footy."
5. Prospect
6. Alberton
7. Elizabeth
8. Richmond "West's home ground is quite similar to South Adelaide, but with slightly more bearable temperatures. .................The biggest dissaspointment about Richmond oval is their dodgy digital clock...........get your act together Westies, or you'll be venue wooden spooner.
That honour currently belongs to South."
9. Noarlunga
North Adelaide F C : Champions of Aust 1972 : Premiers 1900, 02, 05, 20, 30, 31, 49, 52, 60, 71, 72, 87, 91
-
RoosterMarty
- Coach
- Posts: 6524
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:00 pm
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Location: Adelaide (near Prospect Oval)
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Contact:
- Dutchy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 47486
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:54 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: North Melbourne
- Location: Location, Location
- Has thanked: 2937 times
- Been thanked: 4844 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
He has no idea unfortuantely...bring back Phil!!!!
He said in one article a team was favourite at the TAB....the TAB dont bet on SANFL.....WADH!!!
He said in one article a team was favourite at the TAB....the TAB dont bet on SANFL.....WADH!!!
- Thiele
- Coach
- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:37 pm
- Team: West Adelaide
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Location: The wolf packs den
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 125 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
Agree our Digtal is dodgy hopefully it should be fixed shortly


James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist
Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
- Ian
- Moderator
- Posts: 11443
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:55 pm
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Essendon
- Team: Lockleys
- Has thanked: 312 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
I was thinking the same, no mention for North, Port, Dog's, just placings.RoosterMarty wrote:No mention of North's time clock?
North Adelaide F C : Champions of Aust 1972 : Premiers 1900, 02, 05, 20, 30, 31, 49, 52, 60, 71, 72, 87, 91
- Ian
- Moderator
- Posts: 11443
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:55 pm
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Essendon
- Team: Lockleys
- Has thanked: 312 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
Dutchy wrote:He has no idea unfortuantely...bring back Phil!!!!
He said in one article a team was favourite at the TAB....the TAB dont bet on SANFL.....WADH!!!
It was the TAB at Woodville that put it ahead of Unley, FFS, Unley would need a lot more than a TAB to get above about 6th or 7th.
North Adelaide F C : Champions of Aust 1972 : Premiers 1900, 02, 05, 20, 30, 31, 49, 52, 60, 71, 72, 87, 91
- Aerie
- Coach
- Posts: 5826
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:35 am
- Team: Eagles
- Has thanked: 199 times
- Been thanked: 610 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
Who is Dale Clarke? Haven't been impressed with his articles so far.
- Ian
- Moderator
- Posts: 11443
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:55 pm
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Essendon
- Team: Lockleys
- Has thanked: 312 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
Aerie wrote:Who is Dale Clarke? Haven't been impressed with his articles so far.
I've got no idea what his claim to fame is, but it certainly doesn't appear to be his comments regarding the SANFL
North Adelaide F C : Champions of Aust 1972 : Premiers 1900, 02, 05, 20, 30, 31, 49, 52, 60, 71, 72, 87, 91
- saintal
- Coach
- Posts: 5886
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:01 pm
- Team: South Adelaide
- Team: St Kilda
- Location: Adelaide Hills
- Has thanked: 380 times
- Been thanked: 488 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
Noarlunga> Unley+Elizabeth
Elizabeth is the worse place to go and watch footy.
Elizabeth is the worse place to go and watch footy.
SAFC- 60 years...
StKFC- 58 years..
StKFC- 58 years..
-
Brucetiki
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 9:53 pm
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Has thanked: 291 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
What I found most befuddling was that he rated Norwood as number 1 based on good vantage points even though good vantage points are non-existant at the ground.
They don't keep me here because I'm gorgeous and 5'10
-
eaglesfan
- Rookie
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 8:13 pm
- Location: Adelaide
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
I have also been very unimpressed with Dale Clarke's articles.
-
johntheclaret
- Coach
- Posts: 13277
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:09 am
- Team: North Adelaide
- Has thanked: 409 times
- Been thanked: 580 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
RoosterMarty wrote:No mention of North's time clock?
No mention of North anything.
- Wedgie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 51721
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:30 am
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Geelong
- Team: Noarlunga
- Has thanked: 2153 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
"West's home ground is quite similar to South Adelaide,"
WTF?
PS This is the same guy who had O'Hara and Wakelin as the 2 best South Austrlaian born ruckmen in the SANFL a couple of weeks back.
WTF?
PS This is the same guy who had O'Hara and Wakelin as the 2 best South Austrlaian born ruckmen in the SANFL a couple of weeks back.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
-
Ronnie
- Reserves
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:27 am
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 95 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
Don't know the background to Dale Clarke but his articles i've found to be pretty reasonable so far.
in relation to the ovals he also stated that Alberton and Elizabeth were the least hospitable for opposition supporters. A very subjective topic, i know Unley has it's detractors but also seems to have plenty of fans, Norwood Oval seems to be a bit the same from what i've heard. He did bucket Noarlunga, perhaps a little harshly, more about locality than the ground itself.
in relation to the ovals he also stated that Alberton and Elizabeth were the least hospitable for opposition supporters. A very subjective topic, i know Unley has it's detractors but also seems to have plenty of fans, Norwood Oval seems to be a bit the same from what i've heard. He did bucket Noarlunga, perhaps a little harshly, more about locality than the ground itself.
-
HeartBeatsTrue
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1194
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:54 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Pooraka
- Been thanked: 5 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
Brucetiki wrote:What I found most befuddling was that he rated Norwood as number 1 based on good vantage points even though good vantage points are non-existant at the ground.
You've got to be Joking.
I can't think of a bad vantage point at Norwood.
Anyway I think this journo is excellent.
- Dutchy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 47486
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:54 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: North Melbourne
- Location: Location, Location
- Has thanked: 2937 times
- Been thanked: 4844 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:I can't think of a bad vantage point at Norwood.
I cant think of a good one at night....going to take my miners cap tonight
- Wedgie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 51721
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:30 am
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Geelong
- Team: Noarlunga
- Has thanked: 2153 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
Dutchy wrote:HeartBeatsTrue wrote:I can't think of a bad vantage point at Norwood.
I cant think of a good one at night....going to take my miners cap tonight
I can't think of a bad one at night, I usually stand behind the Northern goals and see what's happening at the southern end no problems, vice versa too.
Only bad vantage point I can think of is in the underground dunny!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
- Dutchy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 47486
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:54 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: North Melbourne
- Location: Location, Location
- Has thanked: 2937 times
- Been thanked: 4844 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:Anyway I think this journo is excellent.
He really struggles IMO...quoting the TAB had XXXX favourites in a match when the TAB dont bet on SANFL is just blatant poor research or just a guess...
If he was genuine with the SANFL he would read this forum...Id be interested in him replying
-
HeartBeatsTrue
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1194
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:54 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Pooraka
- Been thanked: 5 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
Dutchy wrote:HeartBeatsTrue wrote:I can't think of a bad vantage point at Norwood.
I cant think of a good one at night....going to take my miners cap tonight
Well if you do, find the darkest pocket and shine your cap onto the oval.
- JK
- Coach
- Posts: 37469
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:41 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: SMOSH West Lakes
- Location: Coopers Hill
- Has thanked: 4509 times
- Been thanked: 3028 times
- Contact:
Re: SANFL grounds according to Dale Clarke (Messenger Newspapers
Wedgie wrote:Dutchy wrote:HeartBeatsTrue wrote:I can't think of a bad vantage point at Norwood.
I cant think of a good one at night....going to take my miners cap tonight
I can't think of a bad one at night, I usually stand behind the Northern goals and see what's happening at the southern end no problems, vice versa too.
Only bad vantage point I can think of is in the underground dunny!
LOL thats right, this bloke's obviously never lined up for a beer or a whizzer at the Parade
Do think visability is good though.
FUSC
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 223 guests
