by GWW » Sat Aug 03, 2013 4:46 pm
by The Sorce » Mon Aug 05, 2013 9:38 am
by Panther32 » Mon Aug 05, 2013 10:22 am
by The Gimp » Mon Aug 05, 2013 11:12 am
Panther32 wrote:Echunga have the next 2 weeks off don't they?
Why couldn't Echunga play at home in the semi against Kersbrook??
by Champ » Mon Aug 05, 2013 1:31 pm
The Gimp wrote:Panther32 wrote:Echunga have the next 2 weeks off don't they?
Why couldn't Echunga play at home in the semi against Kersbrook??
No home finals for the A grade sides. Echunga oval wasn't too bad on satdy but wet weather was starting to take it's toll. By the end of A's it was cut up a bit.
I would expect Maccy will get the GF as Kers and Echunga will most likely be in it.
by Panther32 » Mon Aug 05, 2013 2:17 pm
Champ wrote:The Gimp wrote:Panther32 wrote:Echunga have the next 2 weeks off don't they?
Why couldn't Echunga play at home in the semi against Kersbrook??
No home finals for the A grade sides. Echunga oval wasn't too bad on satdy but wet weather was starting to take it's toll. By the end of A's it was cut up a bit.
I would expect Maccy will get the GF as Kers and Echunga will most likely be in it.
I think both division minor round leaders should get the first final plus a home final every year.
This is a deserved reward for minor round success.
by Pinarello » Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:08 pm
by Afterthesiren » Mon Aug 05, 2013 9:06 pm
by 2old2slow » Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:45 am
by Champ » Tue Aug 06, 2013 9:46 am
2old2slow wrote:Champ in theory i agree with you that the top team should be rewarded but imagine if gum were top i dont think echunga or anyone would be too happy playing there in its current condition.Or in fact mt.barker,bridgewater,ironbank,mt.lofty etc.
by Footy Warrior » Tue Aug 06, 2013 12:28 pm
Champ wrote:2old2slow wrote:Champ in theory i agree with you that the top team should be rewarded but imagine if gum were top i dont think echunga or anyone would be too happy playing there in its current condition.Or in fact mt.barker,bridgewater,ironbank,mt.lofty etc.
I'm under the impression that hosting a final gives you a chance to earn some dollars so I like the idea of the top side getting that reward. Apparently money means a better standard comp....
The GF however is a different story; club reps and HFL delegates should have to visit and get ground reports from around the league, match these to weather reports and that forms the selection of the GF venue. Best on the best day for the best standard period.
Next idea I have is why don't central division clubs host country division finals and vice versa?
by The Gimp » Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:57 pm
Champ wrote:The Gimp wrote:Panther32 wrote:Echunga have the next 2 weeks off don't they?
Why couldn't Echunga play at home in the semi against Kersbrook??
No home finals for the A grade sides. Echunga oval wasn't too bad on satdy but wet weather was starting to take it's toll. By the end of A's it was cut up a bit.
I would expect Maccy will get the GF as Kers and Echunga will most likely be in it.
I think both division minor round leaders should get the first final plus a home final every year.
This is a deserved reward for minor round success.
by Panther32 » Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:02 pm
The Gimp wrote:Champ wrote:The Gimp wrote:Panther32 wrote:Echunga have the next 2 weeks off don't they?
Why couldn't Echunga play at home in the semi against Kersbrook??
No home finals for the A grade sides. Echunga oval wasn't too bad on satdy but wet weather was starting to take it's toll. By the end of A's it was cut up a bit.
I would expect Maccy will get the GF as Kers and Echunga will most likely be in it.
I think both division minor round leaders should get the first final plus a home final every year.
This is a deserved reward for minor round success.
Disagree. Finals should be played on neutral ovals to the competing A grade teams.
A second chance and a week off is reward enough for finishing on top.
Club's that put their money into their facilities should then be rewarded with the right to host a final.
by 2old2slow » Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:28 pm
by Ye Olde Place Kick » Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:42 pm
by absolutebath » Thu Aug 08, 2013 11:43 am
The Gimp wrote:Champ wrote:The Gimp wrote:Panther32 wrote:Echunga have the next 2 weeks off don't they?
Why couldn't Echunga play at home in the semi against Kersbrook??
No home finals for the A grade sides. Echunga oval wasn't too bad on satdy but wet weather was starting to take it's toll. By the end of A's it was cut up a bit.
I would expect Maccy will get the GF as Kers and Echunga will most likely be in it.
I think both division minor round leaders should get the first final plus a home final every year.
This is a deserved reward for minor round success.
Disagree. Finals should be played on neutral ovals to the competing A grade teams.
A second chance and a week off is reward enough for finishing on top.
Club's that put their money into their facilities should then be rewarded with the right to host a final.
by Power From Port » Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:47 pm
by The Sorce » Sun Aug 11, 2013 11:19 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |