by dedja » Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:12 am
by smac » Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:24 am
FOURTH ESTATE wrote:The Bombers better get their Flak Jackets on I think they are going to need them after that article!!!!
The AFL must go very very very heavy on the Bombers.
They are in total denial of what they have done.
As I said before this should be the penalities
$3 MILLION FINE
LOSS OF 2013 POINTS
REID - RETIRE
THOMPSON 1 YEAR BAN
ROBINSON - LIFE
DANK - LIFE
CORCORAN - LIFE
HIRD - LIFE
LOSS OF DRAFT PICKS 3 YEARS
NO TRADING FOR DRAFT PICKS
by Jim05 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:25 am
FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Damo 497 wrote:Essendon are potentially getting done for lack of management. Not sure where the issue of banned substances comes in to it. More the fact that all and sundry did not really know what was happening with the club. Where is the evidence of illegal drugs???? There isn't any. This is all the AFL has. The management at Essendon should hang their heads in shame however; the whole process regarding ASSADA, WADA and all the other acronyms is a dog's breakfast. The media are also responsible for the junk we see on TV, speculation, innuendo etc. Perhaps their qualifications should include common sense as one of the subjects.
In April, the World Anti-Doping Agency confirmed that TB-4 was banned for use in 2012 under the catch-all section two rule of the WADA code. It also specifically listed TB-4 as banned. Shortly after this interview was conducted, Dank said he had been mistaken when he told Fairfax Media that he had given the players TB-4, a claim he has since made repeatedly. WADA has said that AOD-9604 is banned under section 0 of its code that prohibits athletes using drugs that are not approved for human therapeutic use. Dank has refused to be interviewed by the AFL and the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority.
What part don't you understand of illegal drugs???? Jobe admitted he used AOD-9604!!!!! Illegal Banned!!!!!!
by Jim05 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:28 am
dedja wrote:Hird's post match media conference was telling ... stated that he wasn't sure if he would be coaching next week, let alone next year.
Looks like a large whack is not that far away.
by dedja » Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:33 am
by Jim05 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:56 am
by Turbo » Sun Aug 25, 2013 1:26 am
Jim05 wrote:This should make Andy D's night, just as the Essendon saga appears to be ending another saga about to unfold
[url]http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-players-accused-of-supplying-cocaine/story-fni5f22o-1226703462158[/url]
by Jim05 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 1:30 am
Turbo wrote:Jim05 wrote:This should make Andy D's night, just as the Essendon saga appears to be ending another saga about to unfold
[url]http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-players-accused-of-supplying-cocaine/story-fni5f22o-1226703462158[/url]
Is this an attempt by the HUN to deflect away from the big issue which is essendon??
by Turbo » Sun Aug 25, 2013 1:38 am
Jim05 wrote:Turbo wrote:Jim05 wrote:This should make Andy D's night, just as the Essendon saga appears to be ending another saga about to unfold
[url]http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-players-accused-of-supplying-cocaine/story-fni5f22o-1226703462158[/url]
Is this an attempt by the HUN to deflect away from the big issue which is essendon??
Wouldnt think so
Essendon will cop their punishment and the media can move on to the next big story.
Be interesting to see what happens if players are found have been using an illegal drug.
Would the 3 strike policy apply or would they get the book thrown at them?
by Damo 497 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:46 am
FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Damo 497 wrote:Essendon are potentially getting done for lack of management. Not sure where the issue of banned substances comes in to it. More the fact that all and sundry did not really know what was happening with the club. Where is the evidence of illegal drugs???? There isn't any. This is all the AFL has. The management at Essendon should hang their heads in shame however; the whole process regarding ASSADA, WADA and all the other acronyms is a dog's breakfast. The media are also responsible for the junk we see on TV, speculation, innuendo etc. Perhaps their qualifications should include common sense as one of the subjects.
In April, the World Anti-Doping Agency confirmed that TB-4 was banned for use in 2012 under the catch-all section two rule of the WADA code. It also specifically listed TB-4 as banned. Shortly after this interview was conducted, Dank said he had been mistaken when he told Fairfax Media that he had given the players TB-4, a claim he has since made repeatedly. WADA has said that AOD-9604 is banned under section 0 of its code that prohibits athletes using drugs that are not approved for human therapeutic use. Dank has refused to be interviewed by the AFL and the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority.
What part don't you understand of illegal drugs???? Jobe admitted he used AOD-9604!!!!! Illegal Banned!!!!!!
by Sky Pilot » Sun Aug 25, 2013 9:51 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 10:25 am
by Magpiespower » Sun Aug 25, 2013 10:45 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Bomber Thompson to be interim coach
by FOURTH ESTATE » Sun Aug 25, 2013 10:53 am
by Damo 497 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 1:35 pm
FOURTH ESTATE wrote:You Essendon blokes are like lemmings you blindly follow the leader.
Come out of the woods and see what damage you have done to the game and that your leaders are a disgrace to the game and should never hold office in football ever again
by daysofourlives » Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:28 pm
Damo 497 wrote:FOURTH ESTATE wrote:You Essendon blokes are like lemmings you blindly follow the leader.
Come out of the woods and see what damage you have done to the game and that your leaders are a disgrace to the game and should never hold office in football ever again
Pretty sure all of the other AFL are taking drugs of some form also that fall within lines of acceptance from the AFL. If you believe Richmond, for example have never injected a player (not talking illict here) with some form of drug you are ignorant. It's just a matter of what it is. The lemmings are those that believe the media word for word, without any evidence being brought forward for discussion. Where is the eveidence that the players tools illegal drugs????? I'm not saying that potentially they didn't but where is the evidence??
The original story back in Feb 6 of this year was Essendon Players taking a banned drug.. nothing to do with the governance of the club.
by Damo 497 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 7:06 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Damo 497 wrote:FOURTH ESTATE wrote:You Essendon blokes are like lemmings you blindly follow the leader.
Come out of the woods and see what damage you have done to the game and that your leaders are a disgrace to the game and should never hold office in football ever again
Pretty sure all of the other AFL are taking drugs of some form also that fall within lines of acceptance from the AFL. If you believe Richmond, for example have never injected a player (not talking illict here) with some form of drug you are ignorant. It's just a matter of what it is. The lemmings are those that believe the media word for word, without any evidence being brought forward for discussion. Where is the eveidence that the players tools illegal drugs????? I'm not saying that potentially they didn't but where is the evidence??
The original story back in Feb 6 of this year was Essendon Players taking a banned drug.. nothing to do with the governance of the club.
Case dismissed then. Are you a 5 year old because that's the defence they would use and Hird's defence hasnt been much better.
#hirdforlife
by Q. » Sun Aug 25, 2013 7:08 pm
Damo 497 wrote:The bombers will pay, as they should for what ever they may have done.
by Jim05 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 7:10 pm
Q. wrote:Damo 497 wrote:The bombers will pay, as they should for what ever they may have done.
Cheating, I believe.
by daysofourlives » Sun Aug 25, 2013 7:16 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |