magpieeagle wrote:Sam Rowland 9 premierships in a row,who could match that!!! well done to both sam/dawson on a great win
The gowans.
by norm11 » Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:05 am
magpieeagle wrote:Sam Rowland 9 premierships in a row,who could match that!!! well done to both sam/dawson on a great win
by magpieeagle » Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:15 am
norm11 wrote:magpieeagle wrote:Sam Rowland 9 premierships in a row,who could match that!!! well done to both sam/dawson on a great win
The gowans.
by jumbo » Mon Oct 07, 2013 1:46 pm
norm11 wrote:magpieeagle wrote:Sam Rowland 9 premierships in a row,who could match that!!! well done to both sam/dawson on a great win
The gowans.
by magpieeagle » Mon Oct 07, 2013 8:08 pm
jumbo wrote:norm11 wrote:magpieeagle wrote:Sam Rowland 9 premierships in a row,who could match that!!! well done to both sam/dawson on a great win
The gowans.
nah - reckon there was a Sturt (2002 or 3) and an Eagles (2010?) Premiership that beat the Doggies
by daysofourlives » Mon Oct 07, 2013 8:15 pm
by Sky Pilot » Mon Oct 07, 2013 8:26 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Not sure on exact numbers but the Gowans played a heap of Grand Finals before coming to Centrals. Am sure they played in a senior grand final every year of their playing life except 2012
by norm11 » Mon Oct 07, 2013 8:39 pm
by norm11 » Mon Oct 07, 2013 8:40 pm
norm11 wrote:Sorry, chris played in 17 consecutive gfs. Won 9. 8 in a row
by OnSong » Mon Oct 07, 2013 10:06 pm
magpieeagle wrote:jumbo wrote:norm11 wrote:magpieeagle wrote:Sam Rowland 9 premierships in a row,who could match that!!! well done to both sam/dawson on a great win
The gowans.
nah - reckon there was a Sturt (2002 or 3) and an Eagles (2010?) Premiership that beat the Doggies
yea the gowans have 9 but not in a row
by magpieeagle » Mon Oct 07, 2013 10:44 pm
by magpieeagle » Mon Oct 07, 2013 10:46 pm
norm11 wrote:Sorry, chris played in 17 consecutive gfs. Won 9. 8 in a row
by jumbo » Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:57 am
by Swamp Donkey » Mon Oct 14, 2013 1:53 pm
by mighty hounds » Mon Oct 14, 2013 2:13 pm
Swamp Donkey wrote:Any significant player or coach movements for next season?
Mallala: Scott Hahn - retired
United: Cam Faulkner - returning to Kadina
Hamley: Herberle appointed A grade coach.
I'm sure there must be others.
by Lame Choice » Mon Oct 14, 2013 4:01 pm
by Lame Choice » Mon Oct 14, 2013 4:29 pm
Kcco wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:
This year is the first year we have seen the rule backfire on the association, and i think it will happen more and more in future unless something is changed. I think the league should look at age classes. For instance, association should be compulsory for players under a certain age, e.g. 28 years old (???). Then I think it should be up to clubs to nominate those players outside of this age class, e.g. those >28 years old (??), that are keen to play and hence put their name up for selection. This would ensure that the team is filled mostly of young players that still have a chance of playing at a higher level, but also enables those older players to be involved but doesn't penalise those older players that would prefer a week off. Lets be honest those good enough at 28 years old have probably already represented the league in previous years anyway.
Can definately agree with the age class, I think that's only fair.
by Swamp Donkey » Tue Oct 15, 2013 11:16 am
Lame Choice wrote:Kcco wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:
This year is the first year we have seen the rule backfire on the association, and i think it will happen more and more in future unless something is changed. I think the league should look at age classes. For instance, association should be compulsory for players under a certain age, e.g. 28 years old (???). Then I think it should be up to clubs to nominate those players outside of this age class, e.g. those >28 years old (??), that are keen to play and hence put their name up for selection. This would ensure that the team is filled mostly of young players that still have a chance of playing at a higher level, but also enables those older players to be involved but doesn't penalise those older players that would prefer a week off. Lets be honest those good enough at 28 years old have probably already represented the league in previous years anyway.
Can definately agree with the age class, I think that's only fair.
Up for discussion tonight - someone must be reading this stuff. Onya SA Footy
by RooShootOhh » Tue Oct 15, 2013 11:36 am
mighty hounds wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:Any significant player or coach movements for next season?
Mallala: Scott Hahn - retired
United: Cam Faulkner - returning to Kadina
Hamley: Herberle appointed A grade coach.
I'm sure there must be others.
Maybe there isn't? Still pretty fresh in the off season
by OnSong » Tue Oct 15, 2013 11:40 am
Swamp Donkey wrote:Lame Choice wrote:Kcco wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:
This year is the first year we have seen the rule backfire on the association, and i think it will happen more and more in future unless something is changed. I think the league should look at age classes. For instance, association should be compulsory for players under a certain age, e.g. 28 years old (???). Then I think it should be up to clubs to nominate those players outside of this age class, e.g. those >28 years old (??), that are keen to play and hence put their name up for selection. This would ensure that the team is filled mostly of young players that still have a chance of playing at a higher level, but also enables those older players to be involved but doesn't penalise those older players that would prefer a week off. Lets be honest those good enough at 28 years old have probably already represented the league in previous years anyway.
Can definately agree with the age class, I think that's only fair.
Up for discussion tonight - someone must be reading this stuff. Onya SA Footy
Any news?
by Lame Choice » Tue Oct 15, 2013 11:43 am
Swamp Donkey wrote:Lame Choice wrote:Kcco wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:
This year is the first year we have seen the rule backfire on the association, and i think it will happen more and more in future unless something is changed. I think the league should look at age classes. For instance, association should be compulsory for players under a certain age, e.g. 28 years old (???). Then I think it should be up to clubs to nominate those players outside of this age class, e.g. those >28 years old (??), that are keen to play and hence put their name up for selection. This would ensure that the team is filled mostly of young players that still have a chance of playing at a higher level, but also enables those older players to be involved but doesn't penalise those older players that would prefer a week off. Lets be honest those good enough at 28 years old have probably already represented the league in previous years anyway.
Can definately agree with the age class, I think that's only fair.
Up for discussion tonight - someone must be reading this stuff. Onya SA Footy
Any news?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |