finding facts wrote:hey rooster 6'9 thats huge for you cause you would be lucky to be 4'9. lol. is that with his hair standing up?![]()
![]()
![]()
Has anyone seen the full team, if so care to share?
by faxuwill » Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:48 pm
finding facts wrote:hey rooster 6'9 thats huge for you cause you would be lucky to be 4'9. lol. is that with his hair standing up?![]()
![]()
![]()
Has anyone seen the full team, if so care to share?
by upyamuva » Fri Jun 08, 2007 4:32 pm
finding facts wrote:hey rooster 6'9 thats huge for you cause you would be lucky to be 4'9. lol.
Has anyone seen the full team, if so care to share?
by finding facts » Fri Jun 08, 2007 5:36 pm
upyamuva wrote:finding facts wrote:hey rooster 6'9 thats huge for you cause you would be lucky to be 4'9. lol.
Has anyone seen the full team, if so care to share?
C,mon finding facts, thats enough of the "small" talk, it only makes for a "short" conversation. There are "higher" goals in life if you dont "look down" at people. Hope this "wee" bit of advise has'nt gone "over your head" too easily or i'll need to "combover" and show ya how to "brush it aside"![]()
![]()
by faxuwill » Fri Jun 08, 2007 6:24 pm
a bit of hair raising thought!hope for his sake we are not splitting hair`s herefinding facts wrote:upyamuva wrote:finding facts wrote:hey rooster 6'9 thats huge for you cause you would be lucky to be 4'9. lol.
Has anyone seen the full team, if so care to share?
C,mon finding facts, thats enough of the "small" talk, it only makes for a "short" conversation. There are "higher" goals in life if you dont "look down" at people. Hope this "wee" bit of advise has'nt gone "over your head" too easily or i'll need to "combover" and show ya how to "brush it aside"![]()
![]()
LOL great bit of advice, HUGE thanks upya
by faxuwill » Fri Jun 08, 2007 6:28 pm
by finding facts » Fri Jun 08, 2007 6:32 pm
faxuwill wrote:anyone out there know if g cooke got a run this weekend?
by tigertalk » Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:40 pm
faxuwill wrote:anyone out there know if g cooke got a run this weekend?
by leftriteout » Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:57 pm
tigertalk wrote:faxuwill wrote:anyone out there know if g cooke got a run this weekend?
yeah Fax G.Cooke was named in the side. Unfortunately a recent corked thigh flared up early in the first game and he was off and took no further part in the day ive heard. Also word has it that Beau Bysters (Hamley Bridge) suffered a knee injury and was strechered off in the first game too. Bad news for Hamley as they struggle to find consistency in there game. Will be a big loss if the injury is serious. Hopefully its not too bad for Beau.
Anyone get down and watch the game?
by tigertalk » Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:29 pm
by faxuwill » Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:50 pm
by The Rooster » Mon Jun 11, 2007 4:41 pm
by faxuwill » Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:05 pm
by The Rooster » Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:32 pm
by Swamp Donkey » Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:36 pm
by leftriteout » Tue Jun 12, 2007 6:07 pm
Swamp Donkey wrote:I was at the carnival on Saturday, and i could not help but think why bother playing in a carnival if each team does not get a chance to play all other participants. I mean i look back on it now and think well are NE really the best league in our zone???and frankly i dont think they are, but the outcome of the carnival suggests this and that yorkes are a better comp than us!! Yeah my arse!! The carnival was a poor representation of our leagues potential.
By the way, Jared Wilson and Mark Pym had better not be playing this week after obviously not being available. Jared in particular, why wasnt he playing, he played the week prior with no troubles? Oh thats right he was a selector!!!!![]()
The old two sets of rules coming into play for the apfl again!!! Yet Youngy from virginia cops a week automatically for being honest a fortnight ago saying he s not available and chances were that he would not have made the team anyway when he informed the coach.
So what do they pick thier best team, then if any of these players cant play is it a weeks suspension, or if any one of the players in the squad say they are unavailable (even if they not gonna make the final team) they get a week anyway.
Its all garbage to me and many others around the league!!!!!!!!
by finding facts » Tue Jun 12, 2007 9:32 pm
Swamp Donkey wrote:I was at the carnival on Saturday, and i could not help but think why bother playing in a carnival if each team does not get a chance to play all other participants. I mean i look back on it now and think well are NE really the best league in our zone???and frankly i dont think they are, but the outcome of the carnival suggests this and that yorkes are a better comp than us!! Yeah my arse!! The carnival was a poor representation of our leagues potential.
By the way, Jared Wilson and Mark Pym had better not be playing this week after obviously not being available. Jared in particular, why wasnt he playing, he played the week prior with no troubles? Oh thats right he was a selector!!!!![]()
The old two sets of rules coming into play for the apfl again!!! Yet Youngy from virginia cops a week automatically for being honest a fortnight ago saying he s not available and chances were that he would not have made the team anyway when he informed the coach.
So what do they pick thier best team, then if any of these players cant play is it a weeks suspension, or if any one of the players in the squad say they are unavailable (even if they not gonna make the final team) they get a week anyway.
Its all garbage to me and many others around the league!!!!!!!!
by Start » Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:54 am
Swamp Donkey wrote:I was at the carnival on Saturday, and i could not help but think why bother playing in a carnival if each team does not get a chance to play all other participants. I mean i look back on it now and think well are NE really the best league in our zone???and frankly i dont think they are, but the outcome of the carnival suggests this and that yorkes are a better comp than us!! Yeah my arse!! The carnival was a poor representation of our leagues potential.
By the way, Jared Wilson and Mark Pym had better not be playing this week after obviously not being available. Jared in particular, why wasnt he playing, he played the week prior with no troubles? Oh thats right he was a selector!!!!![]()
The old two sets of rules coming into play for the apfl again!!! Yet Youngy from virginia cops a week automatically for being honest a fortnight ago saying he s not available and chances were that he would not have made the team anyway when he informed the coach.
So what do they pick thier best team, then if any of these players cant play is it a weeks suspension, or if any one of the players in the squad say they are unavailable (even if they not gonna make the final team) they get a week anyway.
Its all garbage to me and many others around the league!!!!!!!!
by upyamuva » Wed Jun 13, 2007 8:07 am
by wedge tail » Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:40 pm
by The Rooster » Wed Jun 13, 2007 7:09 pm
upyamuva wrote:Eager to hear your view Rooster on this two rule APFL fiascoJ.Wilson v M.Young
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |