by Booney » Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:43 pm
by HH3 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:49 pm
by Squids » Wed Jan 29, 2014 3:01 pm
by Spargo » Wed Jan 29, 2014 3:06 pm
Squids wrote:i'd ban you all if I was a mod
by HH3 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:57 pm
by Jim05 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:48 pm
HH3 wrote:Some dodgy "investment group" trying to rope me into giving my money to them. They sent me a brochure at work, then keep ringing me to invest. I know they're dodgy.
by Squids » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:51 pm
Jim05 wrote:HH3 wrote:Some dodgy "investment group" trying to rope me into giving my money to them. They sent me a brochure at work, then keep ringing me to invest. I know they're dodgy.
Name and shame the shonksters
by HH3 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:05 pm
by wristwatcher » Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:04 pm
by kickinit » Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:23 pm
Jim05 wrote:Bus Drivers not collecting fares.
Are they not in effect stealing money from their employer?
They should all be fired on the spot, friggin unions
by Spargo » Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:03 pm
by kickinit » Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:22 pm
Spargo wrote:Or lack of safety conditions.
F#ck me, kicking bus drivers - are we all in a position that is aware of all the facts?
by Q. » Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:30 pm
kickinit wrote:Spargo wrote:Or lack of safety conditions.
F#ck me, kicking bus drivers - are we all in a position that is aware of all the facts?
If there was a lack of safety conditions, then Safe Work SA would of been in and shut them down or given them a time frame to fix the issues. And if it was because of "safety conditions" then why would they still be operating the buses? If I had a safety issue at work the last thing I would be doing is putting myself in that position.
by dedja » Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:31 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:48 pm
by kickinit » Wed Jan 29, 2014 11:27 pm
Q. wrote:kickinit wrote:Spargo wrote:Or lack of safety conditions.
F#ck me, kicking bus drivers - are we all in a position that is aware of all the facts?
If there was a lack of safety conditions, then Safe Work SA would of been in and shut them down or given them a time frame to fix the issues. And if it was because of "safety conditions" then why would they still be operating the buses? If I had a safety issue at work the last thing I would be doing is putting myself in that position.
Why do you think they are striking?
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Jan 29, 2014 11:35 pm
by Q. » Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:35 am
kickinit wrote:Q. wrote:kickinit wrote:Spargo wrote:Or lack of safety conditions.
F#ck me, kicking bus drivers - are we all in a position that is aware of all the facts?
If there was a lack of safety conditions, then Safe Work SA would of been in and shut them down or given them a time frame to fix the issues. And if it was because of "safety conditions" then why would they still be operating the buses? If I had a safety issue at work the last thing I would be doing is putting myself in that position.
Why do you think they are striking?
A pay rise and "safer working conditions". Do you really think still driving a bus but not taking fares is related to safer conditions? Why would you take a job if you didn't think it was safe.
by Mr Beefy » Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:46 am
by heater31 » Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:25 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |