by heater31 » Mon Feb 03, 2014 11:50 am
by beenreal » Mon Feb 03, 2014 2:51 pm
am Bays wrote:Booney wrote:am Bays wrote:The thread that keeps on giving!!!
Not sure if it is in the class of the "Running Sheet thread", "the Norwood, West Salary cap thread" any of the "Gowans' are thugs threads" (in particular the one after the 2007 GF) and the grand-daddy of this thread No AFL Reserves in the SANFL thread" but just when you think it is dead off it goes again.
Keep it up lads I'm sure you can keep the Mb flowing!!
Absolutely! I do feel as though we are closing in on a resolution though.
You must be looking forward to your league side playing our reserves side mate. You blokes might be a chance.
Mebbe, not looking to Glenelg diehard players that we spent $$$$ developing ( Cornes, Logan, Hitchcock & Clurey ) playing agaisnt us.
I mean they're OUR players, WE developed
by DOC » Mon Feb 03, 2014 5:06 pm
by Gravel » Mon Feb 03, 2014 5:21 pm
am Bays wrote:Booney wrote:am Bays wrote:The thread that keeps on giving!!!
Not sure if it is in the class of the "Running Sheet thread", "the Norwood, West Salary cap thread" any of the "Gowans' are thugs threads" (in particular the one after the 2007 GF) and the grand-daddy of this thread No AFL Reserves in the SANFL thread" but just when you think it is dead off it goes again.
Keep it up lads I'm sure you can keep the Mb flowing!!
Absolutely! I do feel as though we are closing in on a resolution though.
You must be looking forward to your league side playing our reserves side mate. You blokes might be a chance.
Mebbe, not looking to Glenelg diehard players that we spent $$$$ developing ( Cornes, Logan, Hitchcock & Clurey ) playing agaisnt us.
I mean they're OUR players, WE developed
by Pseudo » Mon Feb 03, 2014 7:45 pm
Booney wrote:"Reserves" teams beating "league" teams in a "reserves" competition with 80% "league" teams.
by csbowes » Sat Feb 08, 2014 6:37 pm
by RustyCage » Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:36 pm
csbowes wrote:Today the Power played the Magpies...
... and the Magpies wore a Power guernsey.
End this thread, that says it all.
by csbowes » Sat Feb 08, 2014 8:04 pm
by RustyCage » Sat Feb 08, 2014 8:25 pm
csbowes wrote:It was clearly reported as a Power v Magpies game and it was noted by the reporters the lack of Magpies guernsey.
by cracka » Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:13 pm
RustyCage wrote:csbowes wrote:It was clearly reported as a Power v Magpies game and it was noted by the reporters the lack of Magpies guernsey.
No. No it wasn't. Was always a combined internal trial. Anyone reporting it as anything different should do their research or stop making up crap.
If the reporters had any credibility they'd have known that both the Power black guernsey and the Magpies guernsey are still being manufactured. They were either not there today, or ignored the few times that it was mentioned over the loud speakers.
by kickinit » Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:53 pm
csbowes wrote:It was clearly reported as a Power v Magpies game and it was noted by the reporters the lack of Magpies guernsey.
With the first opportunity to see the club in action in 2014, supporters will not want to miss the chance to see Port Adelaide’s combined Power and Magpies internal trial, with players on the field from 4:30pm.
The teams will involve a mix of players from the club’s AFL and SANFL lists wearing either the black home or white clash Power guernsey, due to the club’s traditional SANFL prison bar guernsey for the 2014 season still being in production externally.
But the likes of Magpie senior-listers Steve Summerton and Aseri Raikiwasa will still be on the field during the day.
by csbowes » Sat Feb 08, 2014 10:02 pm
by StrayDog » Sun Feb 09, 2014 3:09 am
RustyCage wrote:csbowes wrote:It was clearly reported as a Power v Magpies game and it was noted by the reporters the lack of Magpies guernsey.
No. No it wasn't. Was always a combined internal trial. Anyone reporting it as anything different should do their research or stop making up crap.
If the reporters had any credibility they'd have known that both the Power black guernsey and the Magpies guernsey are still being manufactured. They were either not there today, or ignored the few times that it was mentioned over the loud speakers.
csbowes wrote:Channel 7 news reported it differently. Go ask Soders...
However, what you have provided seems more authorative and I'm happy to concede that... at the same time, it just shows how this team is going to be reported on by mainstream media.
cracka wrote:What. South Australians who are not power or crows supporters making up crap, surely not.
by Apachebulldog » Sun Feb 09, 2014 10:27 am
by Macca19 » Sun Feb 09, 2014 11:30 am
by topsywaldron » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:16 pm
by whufc » Sun Feb 09, 2014 2:04 pm
topsywaldron wrote:The real point was Peter Rohde referring to it as an internal trial with 'some Magpies top up players playing'.
by topsywaldron » Sun Feb 09, 2014 3:19 pm
by RustyCage » Sun Feb 09, 2014 3:25 pm
cracka wrote:RustyCage wrote:csbowes wrote:It was clearly reported as a Power v Magpies game and it was noted by the reporters the lack of Magpies guernsey.
No. No it wasn't. Was always a combined internal trial. Anyone reporting it as anything different should do their research or stop making up crap.
If the reporters had any credibility they'd have known that both the Power black guernsey and the Magpies guernsey are still being manufactured. They were either not there today, or ignored the few times that it was mentioned over the loud speakers.
What. South Australians who are not power or crows supporters making up crap, surely not.
by RustyCage » Sun Feb 09, 2014 3:37 pm
csbowes wrote:Channel 7 news reported it differently. Go ask Soders...p
However, what you have provided seems more authorative and I'm happy to concede that... at the same time, it just shows how this team is going to be reported on by mainstream media.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |