by Squids » Thu Feb 13, 2014 8:19 pm
by beeroclock » Thu Feb 13, 2014 9:22 pm
Squids wrote:http://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/the-mystery-of-the-giant-sshape-rott-nest-monster-detected-by-weather-radar-near-wa/story-e6frflp0-1226825745833
god damn aliens
by tigerhutch » Fri Feb 14, 2014 9:35 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Feb 14, 2014 1:19 pm
tigerhutch wrote:What planet does Tony Abbott come from ?
by tigerhutch » Fri Feb 14, 2014 1:56 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:tigerhutch wrote:What planet does Tony Abbott come from ?
uranus
by Q. » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:12 pm
tigerhutch wrote:What planet does Tony Abbott come from ?
by beeroclock » Sat Feb 15, 2014 7:04 am
by MightyEagles » Sat Feb 15, 2014 9:58 am
by Squids » Sat Feb 15, 2014 11:08 am
beeroclock wrote:More alien movement.
Moonta pub last night some guy was complaining about the rain .
by bennymacca » Sat Feb 15, 2014 12:52 pm
by beeroclock » Sat Feb 15, 2014 1:03 pm
Squids wrote:beeroclock wrote:More alien movement.
Moonta pub last night some guy was complaining about the rain .
That's alien talk, their ships can't land safely when its wet.
by Brodlach » Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:01 pm
Squids wrote:Got attacked in my sleep last night
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:21 pm
by Squids » Mon Feb 17, 2014 3:25 pm
Brodlach wrote:Squids wrote:Got attacked in my sleep last night
So your a little sore today? Or is that sorer than normal?
by Squids » Mon Feb 17, 2014 3:25 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13U1klANrmI
by Brodlach » Mon Feb 17, 2014 3:32 pm
Squids wrote:Brodlach wrote:Squids wrote:Got attacked in my sleep last night
So your a little sore today? Or is that sorer than normal?
lucky for me they tried to get in through the mouth this tiem
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Psyber » Mon Feb 17, 2014 3:51 pm
...It confirmed that a region previously linked to male sexuality on the X chromosome, known as Xq28, is more likely to be shared by gay pairs of brothers than siblings who do not have homosexuality in common. A second genetic region, on chromosome 8, also appeared to increase the chances of a man being gay.
Dr Bailey did not rule out the possibility of a genetic "gayness" test before birth, but thought it would only provide a vague indicator of a baby's future sexual orientation."It would not be very accurate, as there are other factors that can influence the outcome," he said.
The issue of gay genes is almost as controversial as talk of links between inherited DNA and intelligence. Previously some experts have dismissed the idea of a genetic component to homosexuality because of the so-called "Darwinian paradox". This supposes that if gayness was genetic, the genes responsible for homosexuality would be extinguished by natural selection over time. Gay men would be less likely than heterosexual men to reproduce and pass on their sexual orientation genes. The same would apply to their offspring, so that over a number of generations, the gay genes would be expected to die out altogether.
However, one study by Italian scientists has suggested that genes linked to male homosexuality may increase fertility in women, thereby helping to preserve them.
by Squids » Mon Feb 17, 2014 3:53 pm
Brodlach wrote:Squids wrote:Brodlach wrote:Squids wrote:Got attacked in my sleep last night
So your a little sore today? Or is that sorer than normal?
lucky for me they tried to get in through the mouth this tiem
Did they give you a pearl necklace for your troubles?
by bennymacca » Mon Feb 17, 2014 3:57 pm
Psyber wrote:The way this thread has drifted seems to make it the appropriate place to post this little snippet which is rather interesting and fits with several studies that have appeared in the medical literature over many years.
I'm happy for the Mods to move it if they wish.
I thought it was relevant to several discussions that have arisen on this site - but wasn't sure it warranted its own thread.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/21507526/gen ... e-gayness/...It confirmed that a region previously linked to male sexuality on the X chromosome, known as Xq28, is more likely to be shared by gay pairs of brothers than siblings who do not have homosexuality in common. A second genetic region, on chromosome 8, also appeared to increase the chances of a man being gay.
Dr Bailey did not rule out the possibility of a genetic "gayness" test before birth, but thought it would only provide a vague indicator of a baby's future sexual orientation."It would not be very accurate, as there are other factors that can influence the outcome," he said.
The issue of gay genes is almost as controversial as talk of links between inherited DNA and intelligence. Previously some experts have dismissed the idea of a genetic component to homosexuality because of the so-called "Darwinian paradox". This supposes that if gayness was genetic, the genes responsible for homosexuality would be extinguished by natural selection over time. Gay men would be less likely than heterosexual men to reproduce and pass on their sexual orientation genes. The same would apply to their offspring, so that over a number of generations, the gay genes would be expected to die out altogether.
However, one study by Italian scientists has suggested that genes linked to male homosexuality may increase fertility in women, thereby helping to preserve them.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |