therealR0SC0 wrote:They are damaging the brand of SANFL as well
the sanfl brand couldn't be more damage then it already was.
by kickinit » Sun Apr 06, 2014 7:32 pm
therealR0SC0 wrote:They are damaging the brand of SANFL as well
by kickinit » Sun Apr 06, 2014 7:32 pm
johntheclaret wrote:LEH wrote:Played 4... Lost 4...
Nice Work Trigg & Chapman.
What was the Crowd?
2000 Rosters + 4000 Cows = 6000?
4,000 Roosters, 1 Crow who continually complained apparently + 5,999 Crows who turned up late, got in for free and brought their own sandwich's and thermos's
by whufc » Sun Apr 06, 2014 7:54 pm
kickinit wrote:therealR0SC0 wrote:They are damaging the brand of SANFL as well
the sanfl brand couldn't be more damage then it already was.
by Ted E Bear » Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:04 pm
whufc wrote:[
Wonder which bunch of prima donnas will complain first about the SANFL being to physical for them
by kickinit » Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:07 pm
whufc wrote:kickinit wrote:therealR0SC0 wrote:They are damaging the brand of SANFL as well
the sanfl brand couldn't be more damage then it already was.
Yep the two AFL reserves sides have improved the brand for the SANFL.
They have shown how these list fillers are spuds of the highest order.
Wonder which bunch of prima donnas will complain first about the SANFL being to physical for them
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |