by kickinit » Sun Apr 06, 2014 9:16 pm
by whufc » Sun Apr 06, 2014 9:27 pm
kickinit wrote:some interesting facts about the crowds, there is some games that didn't have a recorded attendance. Only 6 games last year attracted over 4,000 people 4 nights games, anzac day game and 1 day game. Finals week 1 isn't listed, finals week 2 9,248 with 4 teams and finals week 3 5,221. Propect best crowd last year was rd 11 3,493 ( rd 17 doesn't have a figure), with a average of 2673. Should the SANFL look at moving to night games, to try and increase the crowds instead of trying to compete with ammo/jnr football.
http://footybets.com/seasons/season/SANFL/2013
by Pseudo » Sun Apr 06, 2014 9:28 pm
zipzap wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:Here's one of my big gripes.
Last year the Crows said they would be playing to win in the SANFL. However, in yesterday's paper Sanderson said Walker would likely resume in the SANFL "in a controlled way, perhaps starting with half a game that builds to three quarters".
Are they going to rest him (or it could be Jenkins, or any other playesrcoming back from a long term injury) if the game is still in the balance at half or three quarter time? That is what the B-grade competition of any standard of competition is for, not the A-Grade.
Similarly if they rest him before the last15 minutes of a one-sided game it's not playing to maximise/minimise percentage.
Just more bullsh!t from them. Not that I was expecting anything else.
Yep, and although it's sweet today, the franchises getting belted week in week out is almost more of a mockery to the comp than them dominating. They don't give a sh1t!!
by Wedgie » Sun Apr 06, 2014 9:32 pm
kickinit wrote:some interesting facts about the crowds, there is some games that didn't have a recorded attendance. Only 6 games last year attracted over 4,000 people 4 nights games, anzac day game and 1 day game. Finals week 1 isn't listed, finals week 2 9,248 with 4 teams and finals week 3 5,221. Propect best crowd last year was rd 11 3,493 ( rd 17 doesn't have a figure), with a average of 2673. Should the SANFL look at moving to night games, to try and increase the crowds instead of trying to compete with ammo/jnr football.
http://footybets.com/seasons/season/SANFL/2013
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by dedja » Sun Apr 06, 2014 9:34 pm
topsywaldron wrote:dedja wrote:For those that can't or won't move on, who have protested by not buying their club's membership this year, won't go to Port or Crows SANFL games, or for those that just need a place to sook.
Here you go.
Just because you don't give a rats about the club or your comp doesn't mean we should be the same.
by am Bays » Sun Apr 06, 2014 9:42 pm
dedja wrote:topsywaldron wrote:dedja wrote:For those that can't or won't move on, who have protested by not buying their club's membership this year, won't go to Port or Crows SANFL games, or for those that just need a place to sook.
Here you go.
Just because you don't give a rats about the club or your comp doesn't mean we should be the same.
Vice President, arena advertising and sponsor the club ... please advise what else I need to do to give a rats.
by dedja » Sun Apr 06, 2014 9:44 pm
by Bounce of the ball » Sun Apr 06, 2014 10:24 pm
by zipzap » Sun Apr 06, 2014 10:49 pm
Pseudo wrote:zipzap wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:Here's one of my big gripes.
Last year the Crows said they would be playing to win in the SANFL. However, in yesterday's paper Sanderson said Walker would likely resume in the SANFL "in a controlled way, perhaps starting with half a game that builds to three quarters".
Are they going to rest him (or it could be Jenkins, or any other playesrcoming back from a long term injury) if the game is still in the balance at half or three quarter time? That is what the B-grade competition of any standard of competition is for, not the A-Grade.
Similarly if they rest him before the last15 minutes of a one-sided game it's not playing to maximise/minimise percentage.
Just more bullsh!t from them. Not that I was expecting anything else.
Yep, and although it's sweet today, the franchises getting belted week in week out is almost more of a mockery to the comp than them dominating. They don't give a sh1t!!
You still planning to go to the practice game next week to serve it up to the crow pillocks?
Sounds like you might have a hell of a time finding one in the crowd.
Better to boycott the game, you know it makes sense ...
by johntheclaret » Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:32 am
dedja wrote:topsywaldron wrote:dedja wrote:For those that can't or won't move on, who have protested by not buying their club's membership this year, won't go to Port or Crows SANFL games, or for those that just need a place to sook.
Here you go.
Just because you don't give a rats about the club or your comp doesn't mean we should be the same.
Vice President, arena advertising and sponsor the club ... please advise what else I need to do to give a rats.
by dedja » Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:26 am
by Booney » Mon Apr 07, 2014 8:50 am
by Panther Pack » Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:17 pm
by RB » Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:33 pm
by Ted E Bear » Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:43 pm
by RB » Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:04 pm
by Ted E Bear » Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:05 pm
by Booney » Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:08 pm
by Mr Beefy » Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:12 pm
Ted E Bear wrote:Rosewater resreves?
by RB » Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:28 pm
It's easy to label people as whingers. Doesn't make what we're saying any less legitimate. But hey, you're having fun with this issue, and that's all that matters, so give yourself a pat on the back, champion.Booney wrote:Bah grizzle grumble. Project players, AFL hacks. Grizzle grumble some more.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |