by JK » Fri May 02, 2014 10:46 am
by Jim05 » Fri May 02, 2014 11:02 am
Bully wrote:considering that Shrek ( wayne rooney ) is on 300,000 plus a week, it is small considering
by Bully » Fri May 02, 2014 11:13 am
by Jim05 » Fri May 02, 2014 11:39 am
Bully wrote:yes jimbo, I am aware players are on that much. My point was in response to WB post as he looked shocked with the emotion on a player being on 100,000 a week where as shrek is on 300,000 as an example. like 100,000 is not much these days , just ask van pussy
by woodublieve12 » Fri May 02, 2014 11:50 am
Bully wrote:considering that Shrek ( wayne rooney ) is on 300,000 plus a week, it is small considering
by JK » Fri May 02, 2014 12:17 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Bully wrote:considering that Shrek ( wayne rooney ) is on 300,000 plus a week, it is small considering
that's ridiculous too
by Jim05 » Fri May 02, 2014 3:27 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Bully wrote:considering that Shrek ( wayne rooney ) is on 300,000 plus a week, it is small considering
that's ridiculous too
by Jim05 » Fri May 02, 2014 4:35 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Bully wrote:considering that Shrek ( wayne rooney ) is on 300,000 plus a week, it is small considering
that's ridiculous too
by Bully » Fri May 02, 2014 4:35 pm
by Bully » Fri May 02, 2014 4:37 pm
Jim05 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Bully wrote:considering that Shrek ( wayne rooney ) is on 300,000 plus a week, it is small considering
that's ridiculous too
Dont mind players earning that if the competition generates it. EPL clubs generate millions so its only fair their best players earn a fair portion of it.
United for instance is just about to sign a new shirt deal with Adidas worth £60m/year, Real Madrid is the current best at £31m/year so its a fair increase
by Jim05 » Fri May 02, 2014 4:41 pm
Bully wrote:Jim05 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Bully wrote:considering that Shrek ( wayne rooney ) is on 300,000 plus a week, it is small considering
that's ridiculous too
Dont mind players earning that if the competition generates it. EPL clubs generate millions so its only fair their best players earn a fair portion of it.
United for instance is just about to sign a new shirt deal with Adidas worth £60m/year, Real Madrid is the current best at £31m/year so its a fair increase
didn't you laugh at arsenals puma deal of 60 mill or what ever it was saying the nike deal current at arsenal is more ?
by JK » Fri May 02, 2014 4:48 pm
Jim05 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Bully wrote:considering that Shrek ( wayne rooney ) is on 300,000 plus a week, it is small considering
that's ridiculous too
Dont mind players earning that if the competition generates it. EPL clubs generate millions so its only fair their best players earn a fair portion of it.
United for instance is just about to sign a new shirt deal with Adidas worth £60m/year, Real Madrid is the current best at £31m/year so its a fair increase
by Bully » Sat May 03, 2014 10:29 am
by johntheclaret » Sun May 04, 2014 10:54 pm
JK wrote:Jim05 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Bully wrote:considering that Shrek ( wayne rooney ) is on 300,000 plus a week, it is small considering
that's ridiculous too
Dont mind players earning that if the competition generates it. EPL clubs generate millions so its only fair their best players earn a fair portion of it.
United for instance is just about to sign a new shirt deal with Adidas worth £60m/year, Real Madrid is the current best at £31m/year so its a fair increase
Fair call. And the fact remains that if a top shelfer can't get the wage they're requesting at their current club, they'll get it elsewhere. So hard to fault either the player or the club.
by Jim05 » Sun May 04, 2014 10:59 pm
johntheclaret wrote:JK wrote:Jim05 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:[quote="Bully"]considering that Shrek ( wayne rooney ) is on 300,000 plus a week, it is small considering
that's ridiculous too
Dont mind players earning that if the competition generates it. EPL clubs generate millions so its only fair their best players earn a fair portion of it.
United for instance is just about to sign a new shirt deal with Adidas worth £60m/year, Real Madrid is the current best at £31m/year so its a fair increase
Fair call. And the fact remains that if a top shelfer can't get the wage they're requesting at their current club, they'll get it elsewhere. So hard to fault either the player or the club.
by johntheclaret » Sun May 04, 2014 11:51 pm
by Bully » Mon May 05, 2014 12:32 am
by Jim05 » Mon May 12, 2014 11:32 pm
Zelezny Chucks wrote:I'm not sure he is even a lock to go to the WC, I think Hodgson will take a young midfield/forward group, with the exception of Stevie and Rooney, and probably look to have a more experienced lot at the back. Sterling, Sturridge, Henderson and Lallana are certainties barring injury so I am not sure he will be prepared to take a risk at the back on a youngster that is, for the most part, untried at that level. Cole's shift in Madrid would have done him no harm so is probably second in line to Baines at the moment due to his experience IMO.
by Bully » Tue May 13, 2014 6:57 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |