by CUTTERMAN » Fri May 16, 2014 10:29 am
by bennymacca » Fri May 16, 2014 11:06 am
by Dols » Fri May 16, 2014 11:36 am
by UK Fan » Fri May 16, 2014 11:38 am
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by dedja » Fri May 16, 2014 11:40 am
Dols wrote:This thread is a 41 page merry go round.
by Wedgie » Fri May 16, 2014 11:41 am
Dols wrote:This thread is a 41 page merry go round.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Dols » Fri May 16, 2014 11:41 am
i am actually enjoying it, but the first 5 pages cover the next 36.UK Fan wrote:Big surprise. A Port fan doesn't like the thread.
by StrayDog » Fri May 16, 2014 11:51 am
Dols wrote:i am actually enjoying it, but the first 5 pages cover the next 36.UK Fan wrote:Big surprise. A Port fan doesn't like the thread.
by sjt » Fri May 16, 2014 12:06 pm
bennymacca wrote:Just a quick note to the contrary - callinan, battersby, Lyons, porplyzia and Riley knight is a pretty average midfield by SANFL standards.
Yes the youngsters have talent but in the old system they would still be on the flanks as the hardened sanfl bodies were in the guts. Because of the topup players they also have way less rotations as those guys can't play midfield.
Not crying poor or whatever just making the observation as to why the crows are struggling.
Can't comment too much on port as I don't know much about them but obviously it's working better from their point of view
by dedja » Fri May 16, 2014 12:20 pm
by mickey » Fri May 16, 2014 1:35 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Not to mention that some of these kids are then playing against the clubs they were drafted from in the first place which increases the disadvantage again.
by dedja » Fri May 16, 2014 1:36 pm
by once_were_warriors » Fri May 16, 2014 1:37 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Fri May 16, 2014 1:39 pm
mickey wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Not to mention that some of these kids are then playing against the clubs they were drafted from in the first place which increases the disadvantage again.
You do realize that once they CHOOSE to nominate for the draft and CHOOSE to leave their SANFL clubs, they are no longer your players... so that means that the argument of them playing against their own club null and void....
by dedja » Fri May 16, 2014 1:39 pm
by stan » Fri May 16, 2014 1:47 pm
mickey wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Not to mention that some of these kids are then playing against the clubs they were drafted from in the first place which increases the disadvantage again.
You do realize that once they CHOOSE to nominate for the draft and CHOOSE to leave their SANFL clubs, they are no longer your players... so that means that the argument of them playing against their own club null and void....
by RB » Fri May 16, 2014 2:27 pm
by cracka » Fri May 16, 2014 5:05 pm
by Dols » Fri May 16, 2014 11:47 pm
they already receive plenty. Junior clubs are the ones that deserve a bigger cut.RB wrote:It would be nice if their original clubs could receive better compensation at least for all the time and effort they put into developing them.
by Bounce of the ball » Sat May 17, 2014 12:12 am
Dols wrote:they already receive plenty. Junior clubs are the ones that deserve a bigger cut.RB wrote:It would be nice if their original clubs could receive better compensation at least for all the time and effort they put into developing them.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |