by LBT » Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:02 pm
by stampy » Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:11 pm
MST wrote:It's a bit hard for Jimbob being so far away and not having seen them live every week LBT.
If the Blues play to their potential tomorrow, with the same cohesion, toughness and run they have shown over the last few weeks, the Bays won't get near them.
Enough faith for you?
by Hondo » Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:52 pm
by am Bays » Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:22 pm
hondo71 wrote:Geez!
It's on!
We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....
It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW
by Pseudo » Fri Jun 29, 2007 9:29 pm
hondo71 wrote:Geez!
It's on!
by smithy » Fri Jun 29, 2007 9:50 pm
hondo71 wrote:Geez!
It's on!
We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....
It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW
by bayman » Fri Jun 29, 2007 10:00 pm
smithy wrote:hondo71 wrote:Geez!
It's on!
We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....
It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW
by stampy » Fri Jun 29, 2007 10:38 pm
by therisingblues » Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:40 pm
hondo71 wrote:Geez!
It's on!
We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....
It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW
by Jimmy » Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:28 am
therisingblues wrote:hondo71 wrote:Geez!
It's on!
We need a 'boxing man' emoticon .....
It's entertaining for those of us not involved BTW
Too right Hondo. I have never seen a group of supporters so sensitive about the use of the term "danger game" before. Perhaps we need to put forward a motion to replace the use of this phrase with the more politically correct, "game that we may lose if we don't apply ourselves one hundred percent" when referring to appropriate games that Glenelg are involved in. A little wordy, I know, but look at the pages of web space that will be saved from the reaction!
by Blue Boy » Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:45 am
by Jimmy » Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:51 am
by Blue Boy » Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:01 am
Jimmy wrote:bb, same here, very nervous, but i always am before a game
i reckon fish would be nervous too, hopefully he is on the phone getting scores wheverever he is????
i wonder when he realised his gaff??![]()
i see button is lined up at chf, i reckon thro chappy or macca in there instead and button plays down back. all depends on match ups i guess or maybe thats where rick thinks they should line up.
anyway, go you blues boys!!!!
by sturt1 » Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:08 am
Blue Boy wrote:Jimmy wrote:bb, same here, very nervous, but i always am before a game
i reckon fish would be nervous too, hopefully he is on the phone getting scores wheverever he is????
i wonder when he realised his gaff??![]()
i see button is lined up at chf, i reckon thro chappy or macca in there instead and button plays down back. all depends on match ups i guess or maybe thats where rick thinks they should line up.
anyway, go you blues boys!!!!
Probably have to see Chappy playin down back - his rebound will be important.
A contest @ CHF will be so important - lets maybe see another rabbit here from Rick. Hopefully its not macca as I rekon he has been very solid @ CHB - as I have had said earlier thats where he plays his best footy.
by godoubleblues » Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:11 am
sturt1 wrote:Blue Boy wrote:Jimmy wrote:bb, same here, very nervous, but i always am before a game
i reckon fish would be nervous too, hopefully he is on the phone getting scores wheverever he is????
i wonder when he realised his gaff??![]()
i see button is lined up at chf, i reckon thro chappy or macca in there instead and button plays down back. all depends on match ups i guess or maybe thats where rick thinks they should line up.
anyway, go you blues boys!!!!
Probably have to see Chappy playin down back - his rebound will be important.
A contest @ CHF will be so important - lets maybe see another rabbit here from Rick. Hopefully its not macca as I rekon he has been very solid @ CHB - as I have had said earlier thats where he plays his best footy.
Blue Boy apart from Luke Button I really dont know if we have another choice. Chaplin is a defender full stop and will give us alot of poise in the backlines. IMO Button has been exceptional since coming back into the side as a defender since he was dropped earlier in the season. You know you will get a real contest from Macca if he plays at CHF.
by Dutchy » Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:35 am
MST wrote:Dutchy wrote:MST - one big difference I didnt mention Craig Evans as a key player tomorrow, you mentioned Mahoney
OMG Dutchy, is there no limit to your obvious stupidity??????
The discussion started concerning Sturt 'relying' on AFL players (pfffftt).
I countered LBT's paper thin assertion with some facts.
I THEN mentioned a couple of AFL players in the GFC side. At no time did I use the words 'key player'.
Is this clear enough for you meathead?
Truth be known, players like Fisher, Backwell, Moore and Kane worry me far more than a Josh Mahoney would.
May I suggest you build a bridge...........and get over it.
by MST » Sat Jun 30, 2007 11:07 am
Dutchy wrote:MST wrote:Dutchy wrote:MST - one big difference I didnt mention Craig Evans as a key player tomorrow, you mentioned Mahoney
OMG Dutchy, is there no limit to your obvious stupidity??????
The discussion started concerning Sturt 'relying' on AFL players (pfffftt).
I countered LBT's paper thin assertion with some facts.
I THEN mentioned a couple of AFL players in the GFC side. At no time did I use the words 'key player'.
Is this clear enough for you meathead?
Truth be known, players like Fisher, Backwell, Moore and Kane worry me far more than a Josh Mahoney would.
May I suggest you build a bridge...........and get over it.
Real classy MST, your words speak for themselves and your character....
by youngster » Sat Jun 30, 2007 11:24 am
by Jar Man Out » Sat Jun 30, 2007 11:51 am
MST wrote:Dutchy wrote:MST wrote:Dutchy wrote:MST - one big difference I didnt mention Craig Evans as a key player tomorrow, you mentioned Mahoney
OMG Dutchy, is there no limit to your obvious stupidity??????
The discussion started concerning Sturt 'relying' on AFL players (pfffftt).
I countered LBT's paper thin assertion with some facts.
I THEN mentioned a couple of AFL players in the GFC side. At no time did I use the words 'key player'.
Is this clear enough for you meathead?
Truth be known, players like Fisher, Backwell, Moore and Kane worry me far more than a Josh Mahoney would.
May I suggest you build a bridge...........and get over it.
Real classy MST, your words speak for themselves and your character....
Yeah Dutchman, I am a real asshole.
You'll find if you look back over some of your posts that it is you who sometimes lacks class.
The use of the word 'meathead' was perhaps a tad harsh and for that I apologise, but for God's sake man, stop putting words in my mouth and trying to make a big deal out of something that isn't.
Enjoy today and may the best side win.
by ElizabethVCRThief » Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:16 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |