by Strawb » Sun Sep 07, 2014 6:51 pm
by RustyCage » Sun Sep 07, 2014 7:30 pm
by Strawb » Sun Sep 07, 2014 7:34 pm
by whufc » Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:12 pm
by bennymacca » Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:45 pm
by Footy Chick » Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:57 pm
bennymacca wrote:anything to do with kids? yep.
maybe for some of the lower end of the scale stuff, like stat rape etc no,
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by bennymacca » Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:59 pm
by Booney » Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:00 am
by bennymacca » Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:09 am
by Mr Beefy » Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:15 am
by Dogwatcher » Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:41 am
by Booney » Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:57 am
Dogwatcher wrote:Not naming them is actually about protecting the victim.
by bennymacca » Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:30 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Not naming them is actually about protecting the victim.
by JK » Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:46 pm
by Punk Rooster » Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:10 pm
screw that for a joke, someone needs to take out the trashbennymacca wrote:I also agree that vigilantism should not be tolerated however.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by bennymacca » Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:34 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:screw that for a joke, someone needs to take out the trashbennymacca wrote:I also agree that vigilantism should not be tolerated however.
You want to protect the " poor peadophile"?
And how does not naming the peadophile protect the victim?
Given that SA has a poor history in this field, it appears the law makers are looking after their own...
by The Apostle » Sun Sep 14, 2014 9:55 pm
Strawb wrote:Should we be naming and shaming paedophiles?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |