by bennymacca » Mon Sep 22, 2014 11:09 pm
by stan » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:39 am
bennymacca wrote:MW wrote:stan wrote:MW wrote:I have no problem with what Roo said. If it's ok for the player to not committ (even if it's just verbally in the media) then why not the club.
Because the club is trying to convince the said player to stay. Its not a onr size fits all rule.
I have not heard the quote from Roo, but from reports it was not a blanket "we are considering trading Dangerfield" he just did not committ to not trading him. Crows would be stupid not to look at offers.
i heard it this arvo, he basically said he would never say never with regards to trading anyone, but he wants to create an environment where players want to stay.
seemed fair enough to me tbh, blown out of proportion
by woodublieve12 » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:42 am
bennymacca wrote:haha danger very drunk at the brownlow. dont think he expected to be so close
by Booney » Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:22 am
bennymacca wrote:haha danger very drunk at the brownlow. dont think he expected to be so close
by bennymacca » Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:24 am
Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:haha danger very drunk at the brownlow. dont think he expected to be so close
Really? I don't think he looked drunk, he's always a bit of a joker/clown.
My lad and I were on Dyson Heppell and big Jono Brown in the early stages for the pissed up award, a couple stormed home late. Paul Stewart from Port and Alex Rance from Richmond both looked to be putting in admirable efforts.
Josh Kennedy and Daniel Giansiracusa the winners at home time.
by valleys07 » Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:41 am
bennymacca wrote:Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:haha danger very drunk at the brownlow. dont think he expected to be so close
Really? I don't think he looked drunk, he's always a bit of a joker/clown.
My lad and I were on Dyson Heppell and big Jono Brown in the early stages for the pissed up award, a couple stormed home late. Paul Stewart from Port and Alex Rance from Richmond both looked to be putting in admirable efforts.
Josh Kennedy and Daniel Giansiracusa the winners at home time.
Seemed to slur his words a bit at the end
by Dols » Fri Sep 26, 2014 9:24 am
dont think anyone did to be honestbennymacca wrote:haha danger very drunk at the brownlow. dont think he expected to be so close
by bennymacca » Tue Sep 30, 2014 10:34 am
by woodublieve12 » Tue Sep 30, 2014 10:39 am
bennymacca wrote:So for the crows fans out there.
Seems like Melbourne have offered picks 2 and 3 for danger. Assuming it gets to the point where danger says yes, which I don't think he will, but assuming he does - what do we think about it?
To me this would be a super tempting offer. If the crows could replace him with two pacy skilful young midfielders it would change the makeup of the side a LOT and I think would give us that midfield balance we were lacking. Would leave sloane and the crouch brothers to do the heavy lifting and then if we could get some young mids who can use the ball well I don't think we would lose out that much.
As much as I love danger I think that would be a win win.
Best case scenario is he stays with the crows and wins a brownlow next year though.
by bennymacca » Tue Sep 30, 2014 10:41 am
by Jim05 » Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:08 am
bennymacca wrote:Given everyone is enquiring about him this year, if he wanted to move, why wait another year? He will get just as much money this year as next to be coaxed away from the crows. No need to get to be a free agent to pump up his value, he would already be in the top 5 earners on the market if he left.
by Fricky » Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:14 am
Jim05 wrote:bennymacca wrote:Given everyone is enquiring about him this year, if he wanted to move, why wait another year? He will get just as much money this year as next to be coaxed away from the crows. No need to get to be a free agent to pump up his value, he would already be in the top 5 earners on the market if he left.
No way would I give up Dangerfield for picks alone. Ready made player with several years experience. Big risk to start again with a couple of kids who may turn out be the next Watts or Scully. Id be taking a first round low pick plus a decent player. Perhaps get into Carlton and take Gibbs plus their first rounder which is pick 7 or 8 or something along those lines
by Hondo » Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:15 am
by Booney » Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:24 am
Hondo wrote:I still struggle to believe that Melbourne would give up picks 2 and 3 for Dangerfield alone. By the sounds this sounds in reality like Frawley plus pick 2 for Dangerfield. Surely another club would get involved in the trade so that the Crows don't get 2 and 3 and the Demons get something else back for the those picks.
If we could get 2 and 3 for Dangerfield I would take it without thinking. You could set up a strong era in 5 years time with that kind of elite talent.
by Jim05 » Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:24 am
Hondo wrote:I still struggle to believe that Melbourne would give up picks 2 and 3 for Dangerfield alone. By the sounds this sounds in reality like Frawley plus pick 2 for Dangerfield. Surely another club would get involved in the trade so that the Crows don't get 2 and 3 and the Demons get something else back for the those picks.
If we could get 2 and 3 for Dangerfield I would take it without thinking. You could set up a strong era in 5 years time with that kind of elite talent.
by Hondo » Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:36 am
Jim05 wrote:No guarantee they will be elite. Plenty of top picks are duds plus if you recruit interstate guys you will find yourselves in a similar situation to what you have now with regards to guys wanting to go home
by stan » Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:37 am
Jim05 wrote:Hondo wrote:I still struggle to believe that Melbourne would give up picks 2 and 3 for Dangerfield alone. By the sounds this sounds in reality like Frawley plus pick 2 for Dangerfield. Surely another club would get involved in the trade so that the Crows don't get 2 and 3 and the Demons get something else back for the those picks.
If we could get 2 and 3 for Dangerfield I would take it without thinking. You could set up a strong era in 5 years time with that kind of elite talent.
No guarantee they will be elite. Plenty of top picks are duds plus if you recruit interstate guys you will find yourselves in a similar situation to what you have now with regards to guys wanting to go home
by Hondo » Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:40 am
stan wrote:But if Danger ia going to leave, well you probably wont get a better deal than that.
by woodublieve12 » Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:42 am
Hondo wrote:stan wrote:But if Danger ia going to leave, well you probably wont get a better deal than that.
It's too good to be true IMO. Even Chris Judd in 2008 in his prime and arguably the second best player in the comp (plus club captain, premiership player and Brownlow medalist) only commanded pick 3 plus Josh Kennedy. Plus the Eagles had to give up a late draft pick to sweeten the deal.
Are we saying Dangerfield 2014 is >> Judd 2008?
by Jim05 » Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:44 am
Hondo wrote:stan wrote:But if Danger ia going to leave, well you probably wont get a better deal than that.
It's too good to be true IMO. Even Chris Judd in 2008 in his prime and arguably the second best player in the comp (plus club captain, premiership player and Brownlow medalist) only commanded pick 3 plus Josh Kennedy. Plus the Eagles had to give up a late draft pick to sweeten the deal.
Are we saying Dangerfield 2014 is >> Judd 2008?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |