by lovethefooty » Thu Nov 20, 2014 12:10 pm
by Legs Man » Thu Nov 20, 2014 12:35 pm
lovethefooty wrote:who are we kidding...
the facilities across the league are terrible!!!!!
there are very few clubs who could confidently boast that their facilities are remotely close to satisfactory.
it is the elephant in the room that no one wishes to discuss....
by lovethefooty » Thu Nov 20, 2014 12:39 pm
by Legs Man » Thu Nov 20, 2014 1:02 pm
lovethefooty wrote:legs man you mount a good argument..
and I don't necessarily disagree with you.
but from what I have seen the clubs in this league seem completely unwilling to spend money on their facilities and making sure they
are of a good standard.
I guess when I think of facilities I don't think of the wines sold at the bar....
by lovethefooty » Thu Nov 20, 2014 1:46 pm
by barrys antz » Thu Nov 20, 2014 2:09 pm
by cracka » Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:48 pm
barrys antz wrote:So did I hear that the fate of echunga is being made tonight??
by Milly » Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:58 pm
cracka wrote:barrys antz wrote:So did I hear that the fate of echunga is being made tonight??
Correct.
by Look Good In Leather » Thu Nov 20, 2014 4:57 pm
Milly wrote:cracka wrote:barrys antz wrote:So did I hear that the fate of echunga is being made tonight??
Correct.
I'm hearing Bye Bye Echunga
by toot toot » Thu Nov 20, 2014 5:13 pm
by the milky bar kid » Thu Nov 20, 2014 5:44 pm
toot toot wrote:Maybe the clubs should vote on their opinions/assumptions of the by-laws (ie, are finals included or not).
I think if it ends up in court, the reasonable person assumption will be used and IMO a reasonable person wouldn't assume finals to be included as it means clubs who don't make finals can't gain any further points.
by Shoot it » Thu Nov 20, 2014 9:33 pm
by StickyFingers » Thu Nov 20, 2014 9:44 pm
by chopper7 » Thu Nov 20, 2014 9:48 pm
StickyFingers wrote:On the bright side Legs Man, at least now you wont have to put up with the woeful, disgusting, disgraceful and below par ovals and facilities that the central division teams all seem to have.
by cracka » Thu Nov 20, 2014 10:06 pm
Shoot it wrote:The thing that goes against counting finals - is they don't count finals on working out combined games won, when they work out how many points each team gets.
by StickyFingers » Thu Nov 20, 2014 10:13 pm
by saintal » Thu Nov 20, 2014 10:30 pm
StickyFingers wrote:The vote didn't go Echungas way
by chopper7 » Thu Nov 20, 2014 10:34 pm
saintal wrote:StickyFingers wrote:The vote didn't go Echungas way
16-3 apparently.
by R. White » Thu Nov 20, 2014 10:40 pm
by chopper7 » Thu Nov 20, 2014 10:43 pm
R. White wrote:Looks like a legal battle is on the cards. Just can't imagine Echunga losing it. If the law does not state that finals are excluded then it will be hard for any judge to rule that Echunga should be relegated.
I know I've said it before but the solution is simple. The clubs should not have been voting on an 11 team comp, they should have been voting on who gets relegated. Fairly sure that would be an easy vote.
Was it a secret ballot or can someone enlighten us on which clubs voted for the 11 team comp?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |