SA Footy • View topic

by **Jimmy** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:52 am

Ill be here 90% of the time and there 10% and the other 15% ill have my left eye here :lol:

by **norman chad** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:29 pm

wedgie,

I cant help but think that you are just wanting to take over from the footysa team. They are the ones who have done all the hard work. Frankly it just seems like you are trying to cash in on the troubles they are having.

can you give a snake a wedgie ?

by **Rik E Boy** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:48 pm

norman chad wrote:wedgie,

I cant help but think that you are just wanting to take over from the footysa team. They are the ones who have done all the hard work. Frankly it just seems like you are trying to cash in on the troubles they are having.

can you give a snake a wedgie ?

Who GAF if he is? A site like this is needed in Cyberspace so who cares who does all the work? Wedgie is hardly going to get an OAM gong for his efforts so wot's the problem?

regards,

REB

by **mick** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:55 pm

Bigfooty has also stepped in to fill the perceived "void" I hope you go over and give them a serve as well :twisted:

As I said before FootySA made a tactical mistake in dropping the comments and talking about closing the site. They should have just closed the whole site without explanation, sort out the problems, then start again. They could have blamed the downtime on technical problems, no one would be the wiser. Anyway looking forward to your comments on the Bigfooty SANFL sub - forum :wink:

by **norman chad** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:15 pm

Having looked through this site it seems like only the idiots have made the switch anyways. It will probably clean up the footysa site a bit keep the clowns here.

So its probably for the best.

Mick, how many more times can you repeat yourself ? Ive seen that same comment 3 or 4 times now across this site and footysa. It was annoying enough to read it once.

by **mick** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:24 pm

OK Fair call re repetition, but have you got stuck into the "snakes" at bigfooty? With regard to idiots if you don't like'em don't come here.

by **Booney** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:26 pm

As one of the people earmarked as a moderator,can Norman Chad please be booted.We dont want his type bagging our type,and Norm if you read this,piss off back where you came from.

by **norman chad** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:39 pm

Booney wrote:As one of the people earmarked as a moderator,can Norman Chad please be booted.We dont want his type bagging our type,and Norm if you read this,piss off back where you came from.

his type bagging our type ?
I dont remember making any homophobic statements

by **Jimmy** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:42 pm

norman chad wrote:
Booney wrote:As one of the people earmarked as a moderator,can Norman Chad please be booted.We dont want his type bagging our type,and Norm if you read this,piss off back where you came from.

his type bagging our type ?
I dont remember making any homophobic statements

he didnt!

nc, if you dont like it dont post here, if you want to make trouble you can get stuffed, if not, stay and lump it and talk footy...

by **Magpiespower** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:48 pm

Old norm's made me feel like a WSC rebel...

by **Jimmy** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:50 pm

Magpiespower wrote:Old norm's made me feel like a WSC rebel...

I wonder who he could be from FSA? a mod or jman or troll?? makes you wonder...

by **Coorong** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 2:45 pm

Our first troll, boot him off

by **TigerBoss** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:14 pm

Ironic that Coorong comments about someone being a troll.

I seem to recall seeing some rather troll-like comments being made on sl.org mate...

Which Coorong am I speaking to now? Your split personality is rather humorous.

Nice one not to respond to emails too...get a taste of the truth mate?

by **Booney** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:17 pm

Our first sanflfooty rivalry begins.LOL

by **Coorong** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:19 pm

Didnt realise you expected a response, but I will. Good to see you onboard TB.

No split personality, but if you put your emotion aside for a moment, read what I said, not too far from the truth. I know it a snouts site (or GFC) site, but I did expect a bit more maturity.

by **stan** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:21 pm

Yes every sanfl website needs its own rivalry. Good to have you around TB.

by **Coorong** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:22 pm

AND......... I posted under my title, so no troll there. AND at the end of my statement, said MR Moderator please cancel my membership.

Cant be more honest than that!

by **TigerBoss** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:23 pm

It's a site for Glenelg supporters about Glenelg issues...unless something is wanting to be talked about regarding another club, it's predominantly going to be based around Glenelg issues.

I wouldn't expect to jump on The Roost so I could talk about the Bays...so I don't go near the site...my choice, but I don't complain about it.

Maturity? Care to explain with examples several areas of immaturity?

Blokes having a laugh and a crack at footy stuff = immaturity?

by **Coorong** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:26 pm

Not much point, you couldn't be objective so will let it go at that.

by **TigerBoss** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:27 pm

Says the bloke that logged on and registered himself in as 2 different usernames (not Coorong)...to bag myself and other Bays supporters.

Hiding behind new usernames now? Is that being objective and fair?

FootySA running again

Who is online

Around the place

FootySA running again

Who is online

Around the place

Join us