Hardy Hit wrote:another week of preseason
Internal trial the most likely result HH?
by bandar » Tue Feb 17, 2015 5:25 pm
Hardy Hit wrote:another week of preseason
by Look Good In Leather » Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:00 pm
Buddys wife wrote:Cross glenunga of the list
by Hardy Hit » Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:01 pm
bandar wrote:Hardy Hit wrote:another week of preseason
Internal trial the most likely result HH?
by bandar » Tue Feb 17, 2015 7:56 pm
Hardy Hit wrote:bandar wrote:Hardy Hit wrote:another week of preseason
Internal trial the most likely result HH?
yep, especially as it will be our 2nd weekend since our last trial match. More concerned about what this means for our Round 1 party!
by easy TIGA » Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:00 pm
jo172 wrote:
I admire how Salisbury West aren't playing the Kilburn/Brahma hypocrisy card and are admitting the true reason players left (being unpaid) rather than blaming "excessive payments elsewhere".
by easy TIGA » Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:08 pm
by Q. » Tue Feb 17, 2015 10:31 pm
easy TIGA wrote:If no amateur league club from 4, 5, or even 6 wants to be promoted all being by default then I think it goes to show where local footy really Stands. IMHO I believe there will be alot more clubs that will follow trends of the few clubs that have struggled recently, even those that don't pay. Having a bye in our amateurs top 3rd division is just that, amateurish.
by Buddys wife » Tue Feb 17, 2015 11:25 pm
by Mr Beefy » Wed Feb 18, 2015 7:51 am
by easy TIGA » Wed Feb 18, 2015 7:54 am
Q. wrote:easy TIGA wrote:If no amateur league club from 4, 5, or even 6 wants to be promoted all being by default then I think it goes to show where local footy really Stands. IMHO I believe there will be alot more clubs that will follow trends of the few clubs that have struggled recently, even those that don't pay. Having a bye in our amateurs top 3rd division is just that, amateurish.
Chicken Little much?
Why would a D5 or D6 club throw themselves to the wolves in D3? That smacks of poor decision making.
by jo172 » Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:06 am
Mr Beefy wrote:
How come Salisbury West can affiliate with one team but Wingfield, or any other club, cannot?
by Footy Chick » Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:35 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by LaughingKookaburra » Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:35 am
by Mr Beefy » Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:00 am
Footy Chick wrote:correct. Wingies are seeking an official exemption from the rule, which needs to be voted on by clubs.
by Footy Chick » Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:17 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Mr Beefy » Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:22 am
by Fricky » Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:29 am
by Jetters » Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:37 am
easy TIGA wrote:Q. wrote:easy TIGA wrote:If no amateur league club from 4, 5, or even 6 wants to be promoted all being by default then I think it goes to show where local footy really Stands. IMHO I believe there will be alot more clubs that will follow trends of the few clubs that have struggled recently, even those that don't pay. Having a bye in our amateurs top 3rd division is just that, amateurish.
Chicken Little much?
Why would a D5 or D6 club throw themselves to the wolves in D3? That smacks of poor decision making.
Yeh I'm not saying they should, but I'm guessing that most clubs don't have the stocks or resources to atleast think they might have a crack at it. My point is that below div 3, there are plenty of clubs that are struggling, both financially and finding players, including juniors. salisbury west is not going to be alone. There are plenty of reasons why clubs are struggling so much but imho I think the apps has made big clubs stronger and little battling clubs non existent.
by Footy Chick » Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:58 am
Mr Beefy wrote:My understanding, the rule was introduced, clubs (MP, FU, Kilburn, Wingfield) had a grace period to meet the criteria of the rule. The grace period has expired all clubs must now adhere to the rule, just like any other rule.
Speaking of rules, are clubs no longer allowed to wear white shorts at home games?
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Q. » Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:59 am
Footy Chick wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:My understanding, the rule was introduced, clubs (MP, FU, Kilburn, Wingfield) had a grace period to meet the criteria of the rule. The grace period has expired all clubs must now adhere to the rule, just like any other rule.
Speaking of rules, are clubs no longer allowed to wear white shorts at home games?
No, the rule is that any club can revert to one team for a grace period of one year. They then must produce two teams to remain affiliated.
correct. I reckon that's a bit unfair. It's not college clubs fault that the rest of you dumasses can't figure it out...but that's just my $0.02.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |