by Fricky » Tue Feb 24, 2015 10:25 am
by Booney » Tue Feb 24, 2015 10:38 am
by Fricky » Tue Feb 24, 2015 11:17 am
Booney wrote:I think Rucci missed something, the AFL released figures the other day, showing :
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/h ... 7233781930
ADELAIDE
So far in 2015: 57,103
This time last year: 49,000
Members in 2014: 57,231
PORT ADELAIDE
So far in 2015: 54,342
This time last year: 41,200
Members in 2014: 55,750
So the chump missed out on this little tid bit, pretty much making his whole article bollocks.
On the other "silent" point, is it the tail wagging the dog, or the other way around? Adelaide have given the media plenty to write about since Tippett, Trigg, Sanderson etc etc.
So while the club is taking stock and making changes internally the media has nothing to report. It's not like Adelaide have just disappeared, is it?
They're just doing things a little better. ( Hopefully not for long.... )
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Feb 24, 2015 11:27 am
by MW » Tue Feb 24, 2015 11:31 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:perhaps Rucci deliberately made a mistake in hoping someone from the club would take offence to it, like Roo
by stan » Tue Feb 24, 2015 3:33 pm
MW wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:perhaps Rucci deliberately made a mistake in hoping someone from the club would take offence to it, like Roo
lol yeah Rucci "deliberately" misses the mark
by Booney » Thu Feb 26, 2015 9:10 am
by Special One » Thu Feb 26, 2015 9:12 am
Booney wrote:Adelaide post a $400k loss for 2014.
How was that stadium deal then?
by dedja » Thu Feb 26, 2015 9:13 am
by MW » Thu Feb 26, 2015 9:20 am
by dedja » Thu Feb 26, 2015 9:29 am
by Spargo » Thu Feb 26, 2015 9:35 am
MW wrote:Payout to Sando, lump sum payment for license to SANFL...there are reasons.
by whufc » Thu Feb 26, 2015 9:39 am
dedja wrote:Well, they increased revenue by $4M but spent $5M more last year, including a large payout to Sando.
Shame SMA, shame.
by MW » Thu Feb 26, 2015 9:57 am
Spargo wrote:MW wrote:Payout to Sando, lump sum payment for license to SANFL...there are reasons.
On the flip side, the staff wage bill was significantly lower in September again....
by Spargo » Thu Feb 26, 2015 10:30 am
MW wrote:Spargo wrote:MW wrote:Payout to Sando, lump sum payment for license to SANFL...there are reasons.
On the flip side, the staff wage bill was significantly lower in September again....
The fringe must be in town with this type of comedy gold
by Footy Smart » Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:00 am
by hawks21 » Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:37 am
Footy Smart wrote:Did anyone watch the match? I only managed to see parts of it. thoughts?
by Footy Smart » Mon Mar 02, 2015 11:30 am
by Booney » Tue Mar 10, 2015 3:46 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |