Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Post Reply
User avatar
Panther Pack
Reserves
Posts: 952
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:58 am
Team: South Adelaide
Location: Jimmy Dean's
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 152 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by Panther Pack »

You voted for it North and you got the loss suck shit
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:30 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Geelong
Team: Noarlunga
Has thanked: 2153 times
Been thanked: 4093 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by Wedgie »

Port too classy and too fit, if they'd kicked straight would have been a lot uglier.
Proud of the effort the North players put in though, good trial game run.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
sjt
League - Best 21
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:56 pm
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 59 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by sjt »

Panther Pack wrote:You voted for it North and you got the loss suck shit

Lucky the 6 folded to their threat to join the saafl, they're adding so much to the sanfl. Great win by the professionals. Hopefully if centrals don't make it, the power can go through undefeated.
Special One
Rookie
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:33 am
Team: Eagles
Team: Greater Western Sydney
Team: Mt Burr
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by Special One »

Too many passengers for North today. Poor skill level, no work rate and poor decision making. Only having 10 players in double figures for disposal at 3qt tells the story. Most people will come up with excuses saying we are playing against afl footballers! Simply North were just lazy and didn't rock up to play footy.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1137 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by Jim05 »

Special One wrote:Too many passengers for North today. Poor skill level, no work rate and poor decision making. Only having 10 players in double figures for disposal at 3qt tells the story. Most people will come up with excuses saying we are playing against afl footballers! Simply North were just lazy and didn't rock up to play footy.

Part timers will never be able to get their fitness level anywhere near full time footballers
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29216
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:26 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by whufc »

Special One wrote:Too many passengers for North today. Poor skill level, no work rate and poor decision making. Only having 10 players in double figures for disposal at 3qt tells the story. Most people will come up with excuses saying we are playing against afl footballers! Simply North were just lazy and didn't rock up to play footy.


It's pretty easy to look lazy when you are playing against professionals who are clearly faster, fitter and stronger than yourself

I compare it a lot to in amatuer soccer if a clubs a grade plays against it's over 35 team

At the grove soccer club our over 35 team are amazing players from the past but unfortunatly there fitness, pace and strength simply doesn't allow them to apply there skill in the game enough to be competitive. They don't get to enough contests and can't chase back as hard as the a grade side runs forward, not through a lack of want
Last edited by whufc on Sat Apr 18, 2015 5:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29216
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:26 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by whufc »

Jim05 wrote:
Special One wrote:Too many passengers for North today. Poor skill level, no work rate and poor decision making. Only having 10 players in double figures for disposal at 3qt tells the story. Most people will come up with excuses saying we are playing against afl footballers! Simply North were just lazy and didn't rock up to play footy.

Part timers will never be able to get their fitness level anywhere near full time footballers


Yep give any of us on safooty a year of full time trainee with some of the best fitness professionals in world sport (Darren burgess) and it would be pretty hard not to be fitter than the average joe blow
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
johntheclaret
Coach
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:09 am
Team: North Adelaide
Has thanked: 409 times
Been thanked: 580 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by johntheclaret »

Special One wrote:Too many passengers for North today. Poor skill level, no work rate and poor decision making. Only having 10 players in double figures for disposal at 3qt tells the story. Most people will come up with excuses saying we are playing against afl footballers! Simply North were just lazy and didn't rock up to play footy.

You said something similar last week too didn't you.
Will this be your standard post through the season whilst you have 17 AFL listed players in your team.
Your way of defending the inequality between your Reserve side and the other real SANFL sides I guess.

I'll wait for your next line "well your club voted for it" as your other justification.
johntheclaret
Coach
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:09 am
Team: North Adelaide
Has thanked: 409 times
Been thanked: 580 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by johntheclaret »

whufc wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
Special One wrote:Too many passengers for North today. Poor skill level, no work rate and poor decision making. Only having 10 players in double figures for disposal at 3qt tells the story. Most people will come up with excuses saying we are playing against afl footballers! Simply North were just lazy and didn't rock up to play footy.

Part timers will never be able to get their fitness level anywhere near full time footballers


Yep give any of us on safooty a year of full time trainee with some of the best fitness professionals in world sport (Darren burgess) and it would be pretty hard not to be fitter than the average joe blow


Lol you've not seen me lately. I think it'd take a bit more than a year :)
Ingorudi
Mini-League
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 6:36 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Hawthorn
Team: Gawler Central
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by Ingorudi »

What happend to Johnston no stats to his name.???
Special One
Rookie
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:33 am
Team: Eagles
Team: Greater Western Sydney
Team: Mt Burr
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by Special One »

johntheclaret wrote:
Special One wrote:Too many passengers for North today. Poor skill level, no work rate and poor decision making. Only having 10 players in double figures for disposal at 3qt tells the story. Most people will come up with excuses saying we are playing against afl footballers! Simply North were just lazy and didn't rock up to play footy.

You said something similar last week too didn't you.
Will this be your standard post through the season whilst you have 17 AFL listed players in your team.
Your way of defending the inequality between your Reserve side and the other real SANFL sides I guess.

I'll wait for your next line "well your club voted for it" as your other justification.


I get to see a lot of North games... North are probably one of the most dangerous teams when on the break and when they play direct. At times North play dumb footy especially I lost count how many times they blazed away. Their press was played too high up the field, leaving the forwards too far up the ground. North have too many players with average skill level who can't hit a target for 'semi-professionals'! You see why Spina and Clisby were delisted. North have many to come back in which will fix the team balance issues they have at the moment. Add Obst, Gallman, Amato, Wangerneen and C. Craig in the team, I think they can beat Port.

Of those 17 listed AFL players, how many would barely make a league, how many are just good honest footballers who are only SANFL standard. I'm not a fan of AFL teams, but what other options are their? A former league coach told me this is the best format for the time being cause their were too many restrictions regarding AFL listed players. People need to get over it and live with it. There is no perfect world, just have to live with it and support your team. Without that support grass roots teams in your zone going to suffer and those kids have no one to idolize. For example, kids in Port augusta look up to Shillabeer, kids in Port Pire look up to Johnston and kids in Ardrossan look up to Lodge.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:30 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Geelong
Team: Noarlunga
Has thanked: 2153 times
Been thanked: 4093 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by Wedgie »

Ingorudi wrote:What happend to Johnston no stats to his name.???

Went down with an ankle early on and didn't come back. Our forward line struggled for direction after that.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Special One
Rookie
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:33 am
Team: Eagles
Team: Greater Western Sydney
Team: Mt Burr
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by Special One »

Ingorudi wrote:What happend to Johnston no stats to his name.???

I was told his ankle went pop! It also had nothing to do with the awful surface they played on, that surface was worst then most SAAFL grounds. Players I was talking to after the game weren't happy with the uneven surface.
User avatar
Ian
Moderator
Posts: 11443
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:55 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Essendon
Team: Lockleys
Has thanked: 312 times
Been thanked: 93 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by Ian »

Ingorudi wrote:What happend to Johnston no stats to his name.???

Tripped owe his own feet running backwards
North Adelaide F C : Champions of Aust 1972 : Premiers 1900, 02, 05, 20, 30, 31, 49, 52, 60, 71, 72, 87, 91
User avatar
Ian
Moderator
Posts: 11443
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:55 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Essendon
Team: Lockleys
Has thanked: 312 times
Been thanked: 93 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by Ian »

Special One wrote:Too many passengers for North today. Poor skill level, no work rate and poor decision making. Only having 10 players in double figures for disposal at 3qt tells the story. Most people will come up with excuses saying we are playing against afl footballers! Simply North were just lazy and didn't rock up to play footy.


I can' wait for the day the AFL reserves smash your hybrid club
North Adelaide F C : Champions of Aust 1972 : Premiers 1900, 02, 05, 20, 30, 31, 49, 52, 60, 71, 72, 87, 91
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1137 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by Jim05 »

Special One wrote:
johntheclaret wrote:
Special One wrote:Too many passengers for North today. Poor skill level, no work rate and poor decision making. Only having 10 players in double figures for disposal at 3qt tells the story. Most people will come up with excuses saying we are playing against afl footballers! Simply North were just lazy and didn't rock up to play footy.

You said something similar last week too didn't you.
Will this be your standard post through the season whilst you have 17 AFL listed players in your team.
Your way of defending the inequality between your Reserve side and the other real SANFL sides I guess.

I'll wait for your next line "well your club voted for it" as your other justification.


I get to see a lot of North games... North are probably one of the most dangerous teams when on the break and when they play direct. At times North play dumb footy especially I lost count how many times they blazed away. Their press was played too high up the field, leaving the forwards too far up the ground. North have too many players with average skill level who can't hit a target for 'semi-professionals'! You see why Spina and Clisby were delisted. North have many to come back in which will fix the team balance issues they have at the moment. Add Obst, Gallman, Amato, Wangerneen and C. Craig in the team, I think they can beat Port.

Of those 17 listed AFL players, how many would barely make a league, how many are just good honest footballers who are only SANFL standard. I'm not a fan of AFL teams, but what other options are their? A former league coach told me this is the best format for the time being cause their were too many restrictions regarding AFL listed players. People need to get over it and live with it. There is no perfect world, just have to live with it and support your team. Without that support grass roots teams in your zone going to suffer and those kids have no one to idolize. For example, kids in Port augusta look up to Shillabeer, kids in Port Pire look up to Johnston and kids in Ardrossan look up to Lodge.

Plenty of options, kicking them out for a start.
At the very minimum there should be a cap of 10 AFL listed players each week and the top ups all u21
johntheclaret
Coach
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:09 am
Team: North Adelaide
Has thanked: 409 times
Been thanked: 580 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by johntheclaret »

Ingorudi wrote:What happend to Johnston no stats to his name.???

Injured right at the start and took no further part
I think it was his ankle
VALE PARK
Under 18s
Posts: 660
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:02 am
Team: Melbourne
Team: Goodwood Saints
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 59 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by VALE PARK »

To my mind handball and especially not surprising,kicking skills win football matches.
Norwood still have the edge in these areas hence their continued success.
Until other teams wake up and catch up in junior skill coaching and development the red legs will stay in front of the field.
It's early but I notice Norwood are easily leading the U 16 comp again!
Keep working on those skills.
daysofourlives
Coach
Posts: 12082
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:05 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Hawthorn
Team: Angaston
Has thanked: 2691 times
Been thanked: 1788 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by daysofourlives »

Special One wrote:
johntheclaret wrote:
Special One wrote:Too many passengers for North today. Poor skill level, no work rate and poor decision making. Only having 10 players in double figures for disposal at 3qt tells the story. Most people will come up with excuses saying we are playing against afl footballers! Simply North were just lazy and didn't rock up to play footy.

You said something similar last week too didn't you.
Will this be your standard post through the season whilst you have 17 AFL listed players in your team.
Your way of defending the inequality between your Reserve side and the other real SANFL sides I guess.

I'll wait for your next line "well your club voted for it" as your other justification.


I get to see a lot of North games... North are probably one of the most dangerous teams when on the break and when they play direct. At times North play dumb footy especially I lost count how many times they blazed away. Their press was played too high up the field, leaving the forwards too far up the ground. North have too many players with average skill level who can't hit a target for 'semi-professionals'! You see why Spina and Clisby were delisted. North have many to come back in which will fix the team balance issues they have at the moment. Add Obst, Gallman, Amato, Wangerneen and C. Craig in the team, I think they can beat Port.

Of those 17 listed AFL players, how many would barely make a league, how many are just good honest footballers who are only SANFL standard. I'm not a fan of AFL teams, but what other options are their? A former league coach told me this is the best format for the time being cause their were too many restrictions regarding AFL listed players. People need to get over it and live with it. There is no perfect world, just have to live with it and support your team. Without that support grass roots teams in your zone going to suffer and those kids have no one to idolize. For example, kids in Port augusta look up to Shillabeer, kids in Port Pire look up to Johnston and kids in Ardrossan look up to Lodge.


I've said it before and i'll say it again, you really are a special one arnt you
**** em off
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019
Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
User avatar
wild dog
Under 18s
Posts: 552
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:26 am
Team: Central District
Team: Smithfield
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 180 times
Contact:

Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10

Post by wild dog »

Game looked good on the tv and I was surprised at Norths size and speed. Geez Schillabeer really is a find and he easily kicks a ball 55m+. Power reserves at this time of the year look like they have the flag, but we know injuries later on and selection dilemmas later on in the year if their A team make the VFL finals. Its a joke, but what can you do. For me North look like a threat for the genuine SANFL flag.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 243 guests