by Booney » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:29 am
by Big Phil » Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:27 am
Booney wrote:3 games to 2 is my guess.
by RustyCage » Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:53 am
by Wedgie » Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:56 am
by johntheclaret » Tue Apr 21, 2015 5:51 pm
Wedgie wrote:I'd just give a warning, I wouldn't even call it a push!
by saintal » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:26 pm
by JK » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:36 pm
by saintal » Tue Apr 21, 2015 7:25 pm
by Wedgie » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:06 pm
saintal wrote:3 weeks by the looks of it.
by Rising Power » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:11 pm
by LPH » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:18 pm
by gadj1976 » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:27 pm
LPH wrote:Got 3 games - appeal likely
by LPH » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:35 pm
by Dutchy » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:32 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Wed Apr 22, 2015 12:11 am
by stan » Wed Apr 22, 2015 7:42 am
by on the rails » Wed Apr 22, 2015 9:27 am
by Hazydog » Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:47 am
on the rails wrote:3 weeks seems harsh given the cicumstances in this case?
by Dogwatcher » Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:50 am
by Spargo » Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:31 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Probably didn't deserve three games, but the tribunal would have felt a message needed to be sent, hence the penalty.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |