by Robb_Stark » Mon Aug 17, 2015 11:33 am
by LaughingKookaburra » Mon Aug 17, 2015 5:58 pm
by wonder_kid » Mon Aug 17, 2015 6:12 pm
by mighty hounds » Mon Aug 17, 2015 6:23 pm
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Saw an interesting umpiring decision in the game @ St.Mary's on Saturday and it baffled a few footy heads.
Bloke from Kenilworth picks the ball up and takes a bounce which he lost control of and it skidded . After it bounced 2-3 times the player was tackled (it happened very quickly) but the umpire called holding the man which caused a near riot as most including myself initially thought he was holding the ball... I then thought that the ball actually bounced more than once and the player then was deemed to no longer have possession of the footy. He was only tackled after the ball bounced twice so you can't really do him for incorrect disposal. I wouldn't have had an issue if he was called for holding the ball by the way... But I've never really thought of this scenario before.
I know there is a couple umpires on this forum, what's your thoughts?
by Q. » Mon Aug 17, 2015 6:24 pm
by LaughingKookaburra » Mon Aug 17, 2015 6:28 pm
wonder_kid wrote:Come on lk better things to talk about then an umpiring decision!
by Pag » Mon Aug 17, 2015 6:37 pm
by LaughingKookaburra » Mon Aug 17, 2015 6:58 pm
by Robb_Stark » Mon Aug 17, 2015 7:20 pm
by Jetters » Mon Aug 17, 2015 7:55 pm
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Saw an interesting umpiring decision in the game @ St.Mary's on Saturday and it baffled a few footy heads.
Bloke from Kenilworth picks the ball up and takes a bounce which he lost control of and it skidded . After it bounced 2-3 times the player was tackled (it happened very quickly) but the umpire called holding the man which caused a near riot as most including myself initially thought he was holding the ball... I then thought that the ball actually bounced more than once and the player then was deemed to no longer have possession of the footy. He was only tackled after the ball bounced twice so you can't really do him for incorrect disposal. I wouldn't have had an issue if he was called for holding the ball by the way... But I've never really thought of this scenario before.
I know there is a couple umpires on this forum, what's your thoughts?
by No.43 » Mon Aug 17, 2015 10:38 pm
by No.43 » Mon Aug 17, 2015 11:08 pm
by wonder_kid » Tue Aug 18, 2015 11:11 am
by Robb_Stark » Tue Aug 18, 2015 12:23 pm
wonder_kid wrote:Heard from a source that sailsbury got 4 points appealing tonight if they fail it's 8 points meaning A grade would finish 4th and the b grade will slip to 2nd ! Worth appealing as the a grade can't slip any lower then 4th
by Footy Chick » Tue Aug 18, 2015 12:45 pm
wonder_kid wrote:Heard from a source that sailsbury got 4 points appealing tonight if they fail it's 8 points meaning A grade would finish 4th and the b grade will slip to 2nd ! Worth appealing as the a grade can't slip any lower then 4th
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by wonder_kid » Tue Aug 18, 2015 12:50 pm
by Pag » Tue Aug 18, 2015 1:38 pm
by Robb_Stark » Tue Aug 18, 2015 2:20 pm
Pag wrote:Don't expect a comment from me, sorry people.
by bubba love » Wed Aug 19, 2015 3:17 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |