by RustyCage » Wed Oct 07, 2015 6:35 pm
by Dutchy » Wed Oct 07, 2015 6:40 pm
valleys07 wrote:Tredders now reporting that Richmond have tabled their first rounder for Lobbe.
Geez, I would seriously consider that trade..
Edit- In saying that, it would be dangerous given WADA's challenge against the Essendon verdict..
by Dutchy » Wed Oct 07, 2015 6:41 pm
Booney wrote:Dutchy wrote:Then again is David McKay can get 4 years, then Hartlett does deserve 6!
Splitting hairs, but it was 5 for Hartlett, was already locked in for next year.
by Mr Beefy » Wed Oct 07, 2015 7:08 pm
Jim05 wrote:Butcher re-signed
by Chuck Wepner » Wed Oct 07, 2015 8:10 pm
RustyCage wrote:Happy to read the Butch is here for another year
by Spargo » Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:23 pm
RustyCage wrote:Happy to read the Butch is here for another year
by valleys07 » Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:32 pm
Dutchy wrote:valleys07 wrote:Tredders now reporting that Richmond have tabled their first rounder for Lobbe.
Geez, I would seriously consider that trade..
Edit- In saying that, it would be dangerous given WADA's challenge against the Essendon verdict..
You would be crazy not to take a 1st rounder for him.
by Dutchy » Wed Oct 07, 2015 10:35 pm
by Booney » Thu Oct 08, 2015 8:38 am
Spargo wrote:RustyCage wrote:Happy to read the Butch is here for another year
Convince yourself before trying it on us
by bennymacca » Thu Oct 08, 2015 10:25 am
Dutchy wrote:Port are going to be very top heavy with talls if they keep him, presuming they get Dixon, just resigned Shultz and Butcher.
A 1st rounder for Lobbe would assist the picks they have given away for Ryder and presumably Dixon.
by Booney » Thu Oct 08, 2015 10:45 am
bennymacca wrote:Dutchy wrote:Port are going to be very top heavy with talls if they keep him, presuming they get Dixon, just resigned Shultz and Butcher.
A 1st rounder for Lobbe would assist the picks they have given away for Ryder and presumably Dixon.
They have a lot of tall forward/utility types but only lobbe and Ryder as genuine ruck options
by bennymacca » Thu Oct 08, 2015 10:49 am
Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:Dutchy wrote:Port are going to be very top heavy with talls if they keep him, presuming they get Dixon, just resigned Shultz and Butcher.
A 1st rounder for Lobbe would assist the picks they have given away for Ryder and presumably Dixon.
They have a lot of tall forward/utility types but only lobbe and Ryder as genuine ruck options
I've got a lot of time for a kid called Billy Frampton who is at SANFL level. He's 200cm and 90kg's. He's got some real old school mongrel about him, but having said that, he's a long way off being capable back up at AFL level.
I'd be surprised if we let Lobbe go and I think with no sub next year more and more sides will play two ruckman, especially if one, like Ryder, is a capable forward.
by MW » Thu Oct 08, 2015 10:57 am
by Booney » Thu Oct 08, 2015 11:05 am
by Booney » Thu Oct 08, 2015 11:06 am
MW wrote:Westhoff doesnt need to play forward. The other three do (when not rucking for Ryder). Also with no sub, one of these would be on the bench always
by bennymacca » Thu Oct 08, 2015 11:23 am
Booney wrote:MW wrote:Westhoff doesnt need to play forward. The other three do (when not rucking for Ryder). Also with no sub, one of these would be on the bench always
Correct, Ryder, Westhoff, Schulz, Lobbe, Dixon.
One rucking, one resting, 2 playing forward one up the ground.
by BoundaryRider84 » Thu Oct 08, 2015 11:34 am
bennymacca wrote:Booney wrote:MW wrote:Westhoff doesnt need to play forward. The other three do (when not rucking for Ryder). Also with no sub, one of these would be on the bench always
Correct, Ryder, Westhoff, Schulz, Lobbe, Dixon.
One rucking, one resting, 2 playing forward one up the ground.
I think its a liability to 100% always have a ruck on the bench, and even without the sub rule I dont see many clubs doing this if they dont already. The crows for instance arent going to bring in a ruck.
Every second ruck has to have a spot forward these days imo.
Westhoff is your link man, so thats fine.
Schulz can go up the ground, but that still leaves Dixon and the resting ruck down forward, and that is where it is too top heavy.
Given you have Dixon, Westhoff and Trengove that can all pinch hit in the ruck if required, port are probably the least likely to play two rucks next year imo. Reckon only one of Ryder and Lobbe gets a gig - or maybe even Schulz gets dropped
by Booney » Thu Oct 08, 2015 11:54 am
by Rik E Boy » Thu Oct 08, 2015 12:44 pm
Jim05 wrote:Butcher re-signed
by Rik E Boy » Thu Oct 08, 2015 12:45 pm
Booney wrote:Funny how basically nobody who plays in the competition is rated on this site.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |