by Corona Man » Wed Jun 01, 2016 3:04 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Seriously, this is how petty it was.
When photos are sent in to us, we attribute them thus - Photo: Supplied
On this occasion, by a sheer mistake, our photographer's name was attributed.
This woman rings me up, aggressively and patronisingly lectures me, talks about suing and then wants me to correct it.
Her bloody name would never have been on the thing in the first place! She's complaining that 'Supplied' wasn't there.
Seriously...
Did she ask you to.... Print an apology in next weeks edition... Photo supplied! ?
1961, 1971, 1976, 1978, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 2008, 2013, 2014, 2015.... And don't you forget it!