by Wedgie » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:12 pm
by S Demon » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:13 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Heck. Big blow.
And, yes, it's our past players day and 60th anniversary at Elizabeth this weekend.
by Dols » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:17 pm
hahahaha very positive thinking, a deregistered club are no longer part of the competition, 5th spot up for grabs between CBCOC and Glenunga.Mr Beefy wrote:Dols wrote:
I wonder if he will pay up[emoji15]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mathematically, we can still finish 5th and would then have to forfeit our first final....
by Footy Chick » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:26 pm
S Demon wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Heck. Big blow.
And, yes, it's our past players day and 60th anniversary at Elizabeth this weekend.
Maybe ring Pooraka and see if they want a game? Long shot and its not the same, but at least there's a game on for everyone to watch?
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by carey » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:31 pm
by The Big Shrek » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:32 pm
by Dogwatcher » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:35 pm
carey wrote:Will the league reimburse clubs for lost revenue in losing a home game? Possible take it out of there calls?
Clubs run on a tight budget.....
by carey » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:36 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:Wow. Not sure whether I agree with this or not.
I'm concerned about the punishment being imposed very quickly and one wonders how much procedural fairness Rosewater received. I also wonder how different the rap sheet is compared to other clubs or how bad the other incidents were.
Unfortunately I don't have much faith in the tribunal to be impartial, fair or to get it right. Therefore the results for theincidents of abuse may not tell the whole story.
by S Demon » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:37 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:Wow. Not sure whether I agree with this or not.
I'm concerned about the punishment being imposed very quickly and one wonders how much procedural fairness Rosewater received. I also wonder how different the rap sheet is compared to other clubs or how bad the other incidents were.
Unfortunately I don't have much faith in the tribunal to be impartial, fair or to get it right. Therefore the results for theincidents of abuse may not tell the whole story.
by Dogwatcher » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:37 pm
by carey » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:39 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:300 games for a club and this is what the player involved will be remembered for.
It will be a disappointing legacy for him.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:40 pm
carey wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:300 games for a club and this is what the player involved will be remembered for.
It will be a disappointing legacy for him.
Agreed, Like the bloke that rooted a goat.
by Footy Chick » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:41 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:300 games for a club and this is what the player involved will be remembered for.
It will be a disappointing legacy for him.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by human_torpedo » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:43 pm
by The Big Shrek » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:43 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:300 games for a club and this is what the player involved will be remembered for.
It will be a disappointing legacy for him.
I wouldn't be suggesting in any way that the penalty lie solely on Rumbles.
by carey » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:44 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:300 games for a club and this is what the player involved will be remembered for.
It will be a disappointing legacy for him.
I wouldn't be suggesting in any way that the penalty lie solely on Rumbles.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:45 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:300 games for a club and this is what the player involved will be remembered for.
It will be a disappointing legacy for him.
I wouldn't be suggesting in any way that the penalty lie solely on Rumbles.
by carey » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:45 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:300 games for a club and this is what the player involved will be remembered for.
It will be a disappointing legacy for him.
I wouldn't be suggesting in any way that the penalty lie solely on Rumbles.
It's how average Joe would see it, the straw that broke the camel's back.
by jo172 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:47 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:300 games for a club and this is what the player involved will be remembered for.
It will be a disappointing legacy for him.
I wouldn't be suggesting in any way that the penalty lie solely on Rumbles.
It's how average Joe would see it, the straw that broke the camel's back.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:48 pm
carey wrote:
Camel and a Goat..... Geez you do have some issues
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |