by carey » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:04 pm
by amber_fluid » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:09 pm
carey wrote:Surely not?
The way he comes across in the media especially on the Bomber diaries would surely turn clubs away?
Successful record, No doubt but return to coaching in the modern game?
Wouldn't want him coaching my club.
by carey » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:17 pm
amber_fluid wrote:carey wrote:Surely not?
The way he comes across in the media especially on the Bomber diaries would surely turn clubs away?
Successful record, No doubt but return to coaching in the modern game?
Wouldn't want him coaching my club.
Bomber to replace Hinkley after they lose to GWS and their finals chances are shot
by Brodlach » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:21 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by amber_fluid » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:22 pm
by carey » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:23 pm
Brodlach wrote:Can he even see now, he is always squinting
by marbles » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:31 pm
by Ruben Carter » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:58 pm
marbles wrote:richmond, gold coast, even north melbourne will be at least giving him a friendly call
# brad scott to brisbane
would collingwood consider him ?
by Jim05 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 9:39 pm
by westozfalcon » Wed Jul 20, 2016 10:44 pm
marbles wrote:richmond, gold coast, even north melbourne will be at least giving him a friendly call
# brad scott to brisbane
would collingwood consider him ?
by woodublieve12 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 11:20 pm
by bennymacca » Wed Jul 20, 2016 11:47 pm
by woodublieve12 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 11:51 pm
bennymacca wrote:is there a rumour that he is linked to somewhere or is this just carey speculating?
by Grahaml » Thu Jul 21, 2016 2:56 am
Jim05 wrote:How is he even allowed to coach again.
He was responsible for bringing Dank and Robinson to Essendon and was in cahoots with Hird the whole time of the saga.
by Rik E Boy » Thu Jul 21, 2016 7:28 am
Grahaml wrote:Jim05 wrote:How is he even allowed to coach again.
He was responsible for bringing Dank and Robinson to Essendon and was in cahoots with Hird the whole time of the saga.
Lol. If they weren't going to ban Hird for life, they were never going to ban Thompson. Ultimately talent speaks pretty loudly. Hird in the end was moved on because he wasn't able to get Essendon to perform. If someone thinks Thompson can make them better, they'll appoint him regardless of the Essendon saga he was involved in.
by Booney » Thu Jul 21, 2016 9:10 am
by Jim05 » Thu Jul 21, 2016 10:20 am
Grahaml wrote:Jim05 wrote:How is he even allowed to coach again.
He was responsible for bringing Dank and Robinson to Essendon and was in cahoots with Hird the whole time of the saga.
Lol. If they weren't going to ban Hird for life, they were never going to ban Thompson. Ultimately talent speaks pretty loudly. Hird in the end was moved on because he wasn't able to get Essendon to perform. If someone thinks Thompson can make them better, they'll appoint him regardless of the Essendon saga he was involved in.
by Rik E Boy » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:19 pm
by Jim05 » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:25 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Nothing to do with performance? Turn it up he was clinging on like a Barnacle. If he had a clue and you blokes actually won a few games he'd still be around.
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Thu Jul 21, 2016 8:51 pm
Jim05 wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Nothing to do with performance? Turn it up he was clinging on like a Barnacle. If he had a clue and you blokes actually won a few games he'd still be around.
regards,
REB
Strongly disagree, they needed to move him on. There was no way he was staying. The club needed a clean break and did the right thing just a few years too late unfortunately
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |