Booney wrote:Loves his Port crowd trolling more than he loves his Doggies by the looks of it.
Booney logic, if he doesnt agree with someone they must be trolling. I wouldve thought UK Fan's post was 100% factual
by daysofourlives » Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:06 pm
Booney wrote:Loves his Port crowd trolling more than he loves his Doggies by the looks of it.
by Booney » Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:10 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Booney wrote:Loves his Port crowd trolling more than he loves his Doggies by the looks of it.
Booney logic, if he doesnt agree with someone they must be trolling. I wouldve thought UK Fan's post was 100% factual
by UK Fan » Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:20 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Booney wrote:Loves his Port crowd trolling more than he loves his Doggies by the looks of it.
Booney logic, if he doesnt agree with someone they must be trolling. I wouldve thought UK Fan's post was 100% factual
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Dutchy » Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:38 pm
by Booney » Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:44 pm
by Booney » Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:49 pm
Dutchy wrote:Don't take the spotlight on how shit Port were yesterday UK....
by Dogwatcher » Mon Jul 25, 2016 3:19 pm
by UK Fan » Mon Jul 25, 2016 3:26 pm
Booney wrote::lol:
Not often I hit "Display this post" to see what you've written ie 27k on the weekend.
So, you're telling me, you predicted smaller crowds in the depths of winter for a team not heading to finals?
Bravo, and may I add, very, very clever thinking.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Booney » Mon Jul 25, 2016 3:35 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:This is not a shot at Port supporters, it's just something I noticed in yesterday's game.
Heath Shaw was slammed into the fence by Boak (?) in the second quarter as a behind was kicked - I reckon it was a situation that could've been avoided, I could be wrong, but to me there was an extra shove.
Two points of interest for me:
1) I really hate seeing supporters rising up out of their chairs to forcefully abuse a player. It's rubbish and happens at all games - front-seat heroes. Yesterday, Heater didn't even react - which was fantastic, I'd hate to think how he'd have reacted in his dark days at Collingwood - but there's a potential for something serious to happen.
2) As fellow professionals, don't opponents have a responsibility to ensure the player isn't put into that position? Slamming a player against the fence, where physical damage can occur, and in a position where a spectator can harass them is not looking after a fellow professional. Apparently it also happened to a Port player during the game as well. I know it can happen accidentally, but players are expected to look after each other's welfare these days, hence the changing interpretation of high tackles, and I think this sort of situation falls into that category of personal responsibility.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:04 pm
Booney wrote:Loves his Port crowd trolling more than he loves his Doggies by the looks of it.
by daysofourlives » Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:36 pm
by Booney » Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:42 pm
daysofourlives wrote:So its post mortem time again.
Who will be the final piece of the jigsaw puzzle next year? Is it the second coming of the first piece of the final piece of the jigsaw puzzle? Or will it be the second piece of the final piece of the jigsaw puzzle that is now settled into Adelaide? Or will there be a completely new and 3rd piece of the final piece of the jigsaw puzzle.
Or will it be something far simpler like a game plan that works and 22 blokes that leave their ego at home and work together to play finals. Adelaide lost their so called "final piece" this year and are better for it. Hawks lost their best player for the 2nd time in 3 years and are better for it. Perhaps Port should look at offloading a piece rather than adding one.
Getting someone from Hawthorn in the coaching box wouldnt hurt either
by daysofourlives » Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:50 pm
Booney wrote:daysofourlives wrote:So its post mortem time again.
Who will be the final piece of the jigsaw puzzle next year? Is it the second coming of the first piece of the final piece of the jigsaw puzzle? Or will it be the second piece of the final piece of the jigsaw puzzle that is now settled into Adelaide? Or will there be a completely new and 3rd piece of the final piece of the jigsaw puzzle.
Or will it be something far simpler like a game plan that works and 22 blokes that leave their ego at home and work together to play finals. Adelaide lost their so called "final piece" this year and are better for it. Hawks lost their best player for the 2nd time in 3 years and are better for it. Perhaps Port should look at offloading a piece rather than adding one.
Getting someone from Hawthorn in the coaching box wouldnt hurt either
Getting someone from Port worked ok for you blokes. Swings and roundabouts.
by Wedgie » Mon Jul 25, 2016 5:33 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Booney » Mon Jul 25, 2016 5:43 pm
by Wedgie » Mon Jul 25, 2016 6:00 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Fluffbag » Mon Jul 25, 2016 7:20 pm
by Ruben Carter » Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:18 pm
Fluffbag wrote:I would not pass judgement on Port until they have a preseason that is not affected by the Essendon stuff. Really hard to come up with the right structures when players are not available for preseason games or for the whole year. I never played the game but players talk about how important the preseason is, especially when bringing in key position players into the club.
by Jase » Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:48 pm
Ruben Carter wrote:Fluffbag wrote:I would not pass judgement on Port until they have a preseason that is not affected by the Essendon stuff. Really hard to come up with the right structures when players are not available for preseason games or for the whole year. I never played the game but players talk about how important the preseason is, especially when bringing in key position players into the club.
Finally, a non Port supporter on here that actually has a balanced view and sensible opinion. Well said!
by Spargo » Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:27 pm
Fluffbag wrote:I would not pass judgement on Port until they have a preseason that is not affected by the Essendon stuff. Really hard to come up with the right structures when players are not available for preseason games or for the whole year. I never played the game but players talk about how important the preseason is, especially when bringing in key position players into the club.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |