by philcas » Mon Aug 01, 2016 4:37 pm
by MW » Mon Aug 01, 2016 4:46 pm
by philcas » Mon Aug 01, 2016 5:05 pm
by Booney » Mon Aug 01, 2016 5:09 pm
MW wrote:Keeps the bottom 8 sides playing for something
I don't like it personally
by Booney » Mon Aug 01, 2016 5:14 pm
philcas wrote:The only thing that may be worth while for the bottom 8 is to play for draft picks
Personally I think it should be a raffle with the bottom side having 8 chances to get first pick then second bottom gets 7 then 6 then 5 then 9-12 only get 1 chance after the first round it goes by ladder position.
Once a team has had their name been picked out they are removed from the raffle
Once this is done then you can trade your picks
by Booney » Mon Aug 01, 2016 5:17 pm
by woodublieve12 » Mon Aug 01, 2016 6:10 pm
by Spargo » Mon Aug 01, 2016 6:17 pm
by Jim05 » Mon Aug 01, 2016 6:26 pm
Spargo wrote:Don't reward mediocrity.
by Spargo » Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:34 pm
Jim05 wrote:Spargo wrote:Don't reward mediocrity.
We already do though.
7-8 are zero hope of winning a Premiership.
by bennymacca » Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:19 pm
by daysofourlives » Mon Aug 01, 2016 10:46 pm
by FlyingHigh » Tue Aug 02, 2016 10:29 am
by Booney » Tue Aug 02, 2016 10:31 am
daysofourlives wrote:Just go EPL style for this year
by Booney » Tue Aug 02, 2016 10:32 am
FlyingHigh wrote:But even with the wildcards, only 12/32 make the playoffs in the NFL which is a smaller percentage than the AFL anyway.
The reasoning of the wildcards is not applicable due to the AFL - divisions, conferences and only 16 games. Teams play 2 games against the teams in their division, 6 against other teams from their conference, so 6 others they don't, and 4 from a division in the other conference. Last year was a perfect example of the misnomers this can throw up - middle-of-road at best Washington (9-7) winning a poor NFC East whilst in the NFC North two genuine play-off teams in Minnesota (11-5) and Green Bay (10-6) played the last game to win their division. Green Bay lost, became a wildcard team and proceeded to thump Washington. Likewise Houston (9-7) won a piss-weak AFC South and were thumped by a play-off strength Kansas City (11-5) who were second in their conference to eventual champions Denver.
There is sufficient talent to have eight strong finals teams. The AFL want to keep interest towards the end of the minor round. Fourteen team comp.
by carey » Tue Aug 02, 2016 10:33 am
Booney wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Just go EPL style for this year
What, give each team a point for a 0-0 draw? **** that.
by bennymacca » Tue Aug 02, 2016 12:17 pm
by stan » Tue Aug 02, 2016 12:41 pm
by FlyingHigh » Tue Aug 02, 2016 2:13 pm
Booney wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:But even with the wildcards, only 12/32 make the playoffs in the NFL which is a smaller percentage than the AFL anyway.
The reasoning of the wildcards is not applicable due to the AFL - divisions, conferences and only 16 games. Teams play 2 games against the teams in their division, 6 against other teams from their conference, so 6 others they don't, and 4 from a division in the other conference. Last year was a perfect example of the misnomers this can throw up - middle-of-road at best Washington (9-7) winning a poor NFC East whilst in the NFC North two genuine play-off teams in Minnesota (11-5) and Green Bay (10-6) played the last game to win their division. Green Bay lost, became a wildcard team and proceeded to thump Washington. Likewise Houston (9-7) won a piss-weak AFC South and were thumped by a play-off strength Kansas City (11-5) who were second in their conference to eventual champions Denver.
There is sufficient talent to have eight strong finals teams. The AFL want to keep interest towards the end of the minor round. Fourteen team comp.
Then they take a weekend off before the finals. Massive cock up.
by Grahaml » Tue Aug 02, 2016 5:12 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |