by DOC » Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:03 pm
by DOC » Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:05 pm
by DOC » Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:09 pm
by Magellan » Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:24 pm
by Magellan » Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:31 pm
DOC wrote:The Club can also apply for a permit for particular players in cases involving injury, suspensions or extenuating circumstances.
by cennals05 » Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:31 pm
Magellan wrote:DOC wrote:The Club can also apply for a permit for particular players in cases involving injury, suspensions or extenuating circumstances.
Interesting. I presume this means the Crows can make an application for permission to allow a non-qualified player to play SANFL finals.
I'm sure when the time comes the league will make a decision that's in the best interests of football in this state.
by Dogwatcher » Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:32 pm
by Pseudo » Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:43 pm
cennals05 wrote:Magellan wrote:DOC wrote:The Club can also apply for a permit for particular players in cases involving injury, suspensions or extenuating circumstances.
Interesting. I presume this means the Crows can make an application for permission to allow a non-qualified player to play SANFL finals.
I'm sure when the time comes the league will make a decision that's in the best interests of football in this state.
And here we have it. The SANFL have given the Crows permission to play Ellis-Yolmen this weekend. What a joke.
http://www.afc.com.au/news/2016-08-30/e ... anfl-final
by Magellan » Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:49 pm
by heater31 » Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:49 pm
Pseudo wrote:I should love nothing more than for the SANFL supporter base to treat this sham contest with the contempt it deserves by staying away.
by Hazydog » Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:50 pm
by Dogwatcher » Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:00 pm
by wild dog » Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:07 pm
by Dogwatcher » Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:22 pm
by southernbulldog » Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:23 pm
by Wedgie » Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:29 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Ahhhh, so the people who actually support the SANFL have to pay, while AFL supporters get a free ride for a bit of entertainment when the big boys don't have a game.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Dogwatcher » Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:32 pm
southernbulldog wrote:Absolutely no balls by the SANFL what Adelaide says the SANFL do
with 19 listed AFL players what possible hope have Centrals got
or any other team that plays them after.Surprising they didnt find a way
for Betts,walker etc to get a game.The SANFL ARE SPINELESS
by Dogwatcher » Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:36 pm
Wedgie wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Ahhhh, so the people who actually support the SANFL have to pay, while AFL supporters get a free ride for a bit of entertainment when the big boys don't have a game.
SACA members get in for free too.
by saintal » Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:39 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:On to the game.
It's hard to judge how this one will go.
We have never lost to the Ravens - but, now, we face them in their first final at this level.
by Dogwatcher » Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:42 pm
saintal wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:On to the game.
It's hard to judge how this one will go.
We have never lost to the Ravens - but, now, we face them in their first final at this level.
I'm pretty sure they beat you last year to chalk up their 'historic' first triumph. Hearing the Raven's song on 5rph was a horrible experience. Anyway...
The Ellis-Yolman decision comes as no great surprise. Why bother having qualification rules if they are not enforced.
On the game- from what I saw of the Ravens last week the Dogs are a huge show. Fingers crossed.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |