by Booney » Thu May 19, 2016 10:23 am
by wycbloods » Thu May 19, 2016 3:12 pm
wycbloods wrote:heater31 wrote:wycbloods wrote:heater31 wrote:
Playing at Immanuel i hear.
Don't understand why you'd want to play turf in a hard wicket competition.
Or pull the rug out from under the existing user of those facilities without consultation.....
Who was using it last season?
Adelaide for their Juniors. We find out its signed and sealed from a parent of one of our juniors who attends the school.......
We put in a call to another school nearby and we also find out Keswick CC have also snapped up that facility as well
by Grafter » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:12 pm
by The Bedge » Wed Aug 31, 2016 11:01 am
Grafter wrote:Hello Brothers.... Any thoughts on ASCA going to 7+7 Comp for the coming season ? I think most players at our club (MPCC) are for it, but personally 7 One Dayers may well be the death of me.
8 teams in 9 Divisions. Interesting times indeed.
On another note. Our clubs fees will have to rise just for Cricket Balls alone.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Dark Knight » Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:32 pm
Zartan wrote:Grafter wrote:Hello Brothers.... Any thoughts on ASCA going to 7+7 Comp for the coming season ? I think most players at our club (MPCC) are for it, but personally 7 One Dayers may well be the death of me.
8 teams in 9 Divisions. Interesting times indeed.
On another note. Our clubs fees will have to rise just for Cricket Balls alone.
What was the ASCA format in previous years?
by caleb777 » Thu Sep 01, 2016 9:18 am
by someguy1 » Thu Sep 01, 2016 9:37 am
by The Dude » Thu Sep 01, 2016 2:04 pm
by caleb777 » Thu Sep 01, 2016 5:49 pm
The Dude wrote:Section 1 and 2 being all clubs A grade sides will it be a 1 up and 1 down or 2 up 2 down at least till a sides B grade wins section 3 and joins section 2??
Will clubs get to dictate which section there in?? A example ICC Sharks finishing 6th in a 10 team Section 1 then asking to go down and winning Section 2
Will be interesting how they work this out
by The Dark Knight » Thu Sep 01, 2016 6:40 pm
caleb777 wrote:The Dude wrote:Section 1 and 2 being all clubs A grade sides will it be a 1 up and 1 down or 2 up 2 down at least till a sides B grade wins section 3 and joins section 2??
Will clubs get to dictate which section there in?? A example ICC Sharks finishing 6th in a 10 team Section 1 then asking to go down and winning Section 2
Will be interesting how they work this out
ICC requested to go down after losing a significant amount of their players in the offseason.. But it does show the large gap between section 1 and 2. Belair have consistently done well in Section 2 but have struggled when coming up to section 1. ICC winning section 2 after losing a stack of players was definitely interesting. There was a fairly large gap between the 8 sides last year and Morphy Parks and Morphett Vale. I think Morphy Parks could do well in section 2 this year if they can keep their young players together. I also hope Flo takes a bucket load of wickets, absolute legend and highly respected at the Ramblers.
by The Dude » Fri Sep 02, 2016 6:42 am
The Dark Knight wrote:caleb777 wrote:The Dude wrote:Section 1 and 2 being all clubs A grade sides will it be a 1 up and 1 down or 2 up 2 down at least till a sides B grade wins section 3 and joins section 2??
Will clubs get to dictate which section there in?? A example ICC Sharks finishing 6th in a 10 team Section 1 then asking to go down and winning Section 2
Will be interesting how they work this out
ICC requested to go down after losing a significant amount of their players in the offseason.. But it does show the large gap between section 1 and 2. Belair have consistently done well in Section 2 but have struggled when coming up to section 1. ICC winning section 2 after losing a stack of players was definitely interesting. There was a fairly large gap between the 8 sides last year and Morphy Parks and Morphett Vale. I think Morphy Parks could do well in section 2 this year if they can keep their young players together. I also hope Flo takes a bucket load of wickets, absolute legend and highly respected at the Ramblers.
See I thought ICC made the right move coming down, yes they won the flag but no way they could of competed in Section 1 with the team they had. Sampson is a gun and carried their batting, they didn't have much else. Bowling attack was good but still relient on Tonkes. And if you take out Tansell and restrict his impact (which is hard) Belair are an average side and not good enough for Section 1.
by JapsEye » Mon Sep 19, 2016 9:53 pm
by Grafter » Tue Sep 20, 2016 8:19 pm
by Grafter » Tue Sep 20, 2016 10:04 pm
by Keefy » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:03 pm
by ALCOHOLIC ANONYMOUS » Fri Sep 23, 2016 5:21 pm
JapsEye wrote:Less than 3 weeks til round 1 and it's very quiet on here. I heard today Mccard and at least 2 others have left Cove. Any other known player movements in sec. 1 and 2?
by Go for it » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:46 pm
by Keefy » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:49 pm
Go for it wrote:So going by the fixture Morphett Vale A grade are now playing section 6 not section 2. We now have a bye in section 2 and Morphett Vale B grade have pulled out. Surely this is a joke
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |