SA Footy • View topic

by **stan** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:29 pm

Wedgie wrote:Both GWS players should get off, not even free kicks. The Hawthorn punches on the other hand....

Should also get of under clause 87.3.3.2 the good blokes from Hawthorn rule. [emoji12]

by **Wedgie** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:30 pm

stan wrote:
Wedgie wrote:Both GWS players should get off, not even free kicks. The Hawthorn punches on the other hand....

Should also get of under clause 87.3.3.2 the good blokes from Hawthorn rule. [emoji12]

What's emoji 12 mean?

by **stan** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:32 pm

Wedgie wrote:
stan wrote:
Wedgie wrote:Both GWS players should get off, not even free kicks. The Hawthorn punches on the other hand....

Should also get of under clause 87.3.3.2 the good blokes from Hawthorn rule. [emoji12]

What's emoji 12 mean?

Clearly its the 12th emoji on the list.

by **Brodlach** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:46 pm

Stevie J offered 1 week. Rest fines and nothing for Mumford

by MW » Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:18 pm

all went as expected. explanation on mumford made sense

by **woodublieve12** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:25 pm

If hartigan tripped anyone else he would have missed this week..

by **Grahaml** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:27 pm

Typically on the conservative side for most of these IMHO. Had it not been finals matches I'm pretty confident there'd be a bigger penalty for Johnson, Mumford and Hartigan.

by **Wedgie** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:29 pm

So you can't bump someone to the chest but you can punch or kick people. Nice one AFL

by **bennymacca** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:33 pm

woodublieve12 wrote:If hartigan tripped anyone else he would have missed this week..

Well it did seem that Thomas took the contact and then decided later that it was worth going down for

by **Wedgie** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:36 pm

Ironically that trip would have got two weeks in the old days of footy and would have got the same in the NRL.
I can see lots of broken legs happening soon.

by **helicopterking** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:46 pm

No-one ever again will miss for tripping. As deliberate as you could ever get.

by **Spargo** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:46 pm

bennymacca wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:If hartigan tripped anyone else he would have missed this week..

Well it did seem that Thomas took the contact and then decided later that it was worth going down for

Utter bullshit.

by **nuggety goodness** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:55 pm

Corona Man wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:
Jim05 wrote:[quote="woodublieve12"]Crows easy faves for Saturday. Theirs to lose

Geez, out in straight sets 2 years in a row would constitute a massive failure and surely put the heat on Longmire

No heat on him... We like being the underdogs
Should be a ripping game, but like I said, crows should be easy faves

How bout you blokes grow some and back your team in instead of worrying bout being embarrassed if you lose
I for one think we will smash the puppies along with the dreams of all you losers who take a 2nd team because youre side is on end of season trips. Then when everyone jumps on the Giants wagon the week after we'll crush those dreams too.
Hawks v Sydney for mine.
If im wrong more than happy to take it from all the Bulldogs/Giants fans

Both of them ?

[/quote]
I look forward to rubbing it in when the doggies run the hawks off their feet! The fact we are definite underdogs works so well for me!

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

by **Brodlach** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:56 pm

woodublieve12 wrote:If hartigan tripped anyone else he would have missed this week..

Still think it was an involuntary action

by **Wedgie** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:58 pm

Brodlach wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:If hartigan tripped anyone else he would have missed this week..

Still think it was an involuntary action

LOL

by **valleys07** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:03 pm

The ears of those at AFL house are probably still ringing after the barrage of abuse directed their way after the Sloane suspension.

Hartigan was never getting weeks. Adelaide fans would have booked a stopover in Melbourne en route to Sydney with sticks of Dynamite.

by **Brodlach** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:06 pm

Wedgie wrote:
Brodlach wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:If hartigan tripped anyone else he would have missed this week..

Still think it was an involuntary action

LOL

Wasn't a deliberate act but as I said at the time I thought he would/should miss a game for it

by **bennymacca** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:08 pm

Wedgie wrote:
Brodlach wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:If hartigan tripped anyone else he would have missed this week..

Still think it was an involuntary action

LOL

I thought he would have got a week tbh.

by **woodublieve12** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:11 pm

Involuntary :lol:

by **Brodlach** » Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:15 pm

Would say the same thing no matter what team he played for. Robbie Gray got off for something simular this year

Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Re: Finals Week 1

Who is online

Around the place

Finals Week 1

Around the place

Join us