by Booney » Tue Oct 04, 2016 3:43 pm
by Booney » Tue Oct 04, 2016 3:48 pm
by Jim05 » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:32 pm
Booney wrote:2017 premiership betting :
GWS $4.50
Bulldogs $4.50
Sydney $6.50
Adelaide $8.50
Geelong $9.50
Hawthorn $10
West Coast $12
Port $19
Essendon $19
Collingwood $21
St Kilda $23
Melbourne $23
North $26
Gold Coast $26
Fremantle $31
Richmond $32
Carlton $82
Brisbane $326
Sportsbet 4/10/16
by bennymacca » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:41 pm
by Failed Creation » Tue Oct 04, 2016 5:47 pm
Booney wrote:The Western Bulldogs look set to play at least one ( up to 3 ) games at Eureka Stadium in Ballarat next year. However, locals are questioning if the 11,000 capacity stadium would be sufficient for local Dogs fans, Melbourne based supporters and visiting team supporters.
With it a 7 hour drive from Adelaide, Port would be a chance to play there.
Along with the Gold Coast and GWS as the lower drawing clubs when travelling interstate.
@Failed Creation @valleys07 That's be a road trip.
by Tassie Blues » Tue Oct 04, 2016 8:16 pm
Booney wrote:The Western Bulldogs look set to play at least one ( up to 3 ) games at Eureka Stadium in Ballarat next year. However, locals are questioning if the 11,000 capacity stadium would be sufficient for local Dogs fans, Melbourne based supporters and visiting team supporters.
With it a 7 hour drive from Adelaide, Port would be a chance to play there.
Along with the Gold Coast and GWS as the lower drawing clubs when travelling interstate.
@Failed Creation @valleys07 That's be a road trip.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Oct 04, 2016 8:37 pm
by valleys07 » Tue Oct 04, 2016 8:43 pm
Booney wrote:The Western Bulldogs look set to play at least one ( up to 3 ) games at Eureka Stadium in Ballarat next year. However, locals are questioning if the 11,000 capacity stadium would be sufficient for local Dogs fans, Melbourne based supporters and visiting team supporters.
With it a 7 hour drive from Adelaide, Port would be a chance to play there.
Along with the Gold Coast and GWS as the lower drawing clubs when travelling interstate.
@Failed Creation @valleys07 That's be a road trip.
by Jim05 » Tue Oct 04, 2016 8:49 pm
by kneedeepinthehoopla » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:29 pm
Jim05 wrote:I just don't see the point playing at these shitty little venues. Surely with interest in the Dogs at a all time high they would be trying to attract as many fans as possible considering their membership and attendance figures have been shocking for years.
Rather ironic they whinged about their fans not being able to attend the final in Sydney but they want to play 3 games a year in a tinpot stadium under an hour away from their heartland that will lock 1000's of their supporters out
by Dutchy » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:36 am
Jim05 wrote:I just don't see the point playing at these shitty little venues. Surely with interest in the Dogs at a all time high they would be trying to attract as many fans as possible considering their membership and attendance figures have been shocking for years.
Rather ironic they whinged about their fans not being able to attend the final in Sydney but they want to play 3 games a year in a tinpot stadium under an hour away from their heartland that will lock 1000's of their supporters out
by Spargo » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:52 am
Dutchy wrote:Jim05 wrote:I just don't see the point playing at these shitty little venues. Surely with interest in the Dogs at a all time high they would be trying to attract as many fans as possible considering their membership and attendance figures have been shocking for years.
Rather ironic they whinged about their fans not being able to attend the final in Sydney but they want to play 3 games a year in a tinpot stadium under an hour away from their heartland that will lock 1000's of their supporters out
Etihad Stadium deal, quite simple. Why lose $100k playing GWS at Etihad when you can make $200k at Ballarat?
by Jim05 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:57 am
Dutchy wrote:Jim05 wrote:I just don't see the point playing at these shitty little venues. Surely with interest in the Dogs at a all time high they would be trying to attract as many fans as possible considering their membership and attendance figures have been shocking for years.
Rather ironic they whinged about their fans not being able to attend the final in Sydney but they want to play 3 games a year in a tinpot stadium under an hour away from their heartland that will lock 1000's of their supporters out
Etihad Stadium deal, quite simple. Why lose $100k playing GWS at Etihad when you can make $200k at Ballarat?
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:23 am
by Booney » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:36 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I'm a tad baffled that Booney has started up a thread without getting the thesaurus out for the title
by Dutchy » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:40 am
Jim05 wrote:Dutchy wrote:Jim05 wrote:I just don't see the point playing at these shitty little venues. Surely with interest in the Dogs at a all time high they would be trying to attract as many fans as possible considering their membership and attendance figures have been shocking for years.
Rather ironic they whinged about their fans not being able to attend the final in Sydney but they want to play 3 games a year in a tinpot stadium under an hour away from their heartland that will lock 1000's of their supporters out
Etihad Stadium deal, quite simple. Why lose $100k playing GWS at Etihad when you can make $200k at Ballarat?
Their deal needs about 25-30k at Etihad to break even so with the amount that jumped on their bandwagon at finals time they should have no problem attracting 40k plus each week at home now. If their fans aren't going to rock up now they never will.
by MW » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:43 am
by Jim05 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:53 am
Dutchy wrote:Jim05 wrote:Dutchy wrote:Jim05 wrote:I just don't see the point playing at these shitty little venues. Surely with interest in the Dogs at a all time high they would be trying to attract as many fans as possible considering their membership and attendance figures have been shocking for years.
Rather ironic they whinged about their fans not being able to attend the final in Sydney but they want to play 3 games a year in a tinpot stadium under an hour away from their heartland that will lock 1000's of their supporters out
Etihad Stadium deal, quite simple. Why lose $100k playing GWS at Etihad when you can make $200k at Ballarat?
Their deal needs about 25-30k at Etihad to break even so with the amount that jumped on their bandwagon at finals time they should have no problem attracting 40k plus each week at home now. If their fans aren't going to rock up now they never will.
Why take that risk when you can bank $200k at Ballarat?
by Dutchy » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:05 am
by Booney » Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:09 am
Dutchy wrote:Yet Hawks have increased their membership by going to Tassie?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |