by Dogwatcher » Wed Feb 08, 2017 8:37 am
by tipper » Wed Feb 08, 2017 8:51 am
therisingblues wrote:I was thinking something similar Hazy.
Why not make one round free entry, and see what the results are.
by amber_fluid » Wed Feb 08, 2017 8:54 am
tipper wrote:therisingblues wrote:I was thinking something similar Hazy.
Why not make one round free entry, and see what the results are.
i dont disagree in the slightest, however dont make the trial weekend in the middle of a wet june/july weekend, and then claim it didnt work as the crowds didnt increase (the cynic in me thinks that is exactly how it will go if it does at all.)
by amber_fluid » Wed Feb 08, 2017 8:57 am
Dogwatcher wrote:Remember the $1 Days at the Sheffield Shield?
That was a clear realisation from SACA that the attraction of Shield cricket was rooted as an 'attraction'.
Dollar Days boosted the crowds on Sundays for a while, but then the interest drifted off and the Shield was devalued.
It was only a temporary solution.
by goddy11 » Wed Feb 08, 2017 9:59 am
by Hazydog » Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:30 am
by Magellan » Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:38 am
Hazydog wrote:head in the sand attitudes re change will almost certainly speed up the demise of the comp we love.
by therisingblues » Wed Feb 08, 2017 3:59 pm
goddy11 wrote:So where do you think clubs will make money from? Why would you buy a membership if coming into the ground was minimal to nil? Don't say bars and canteen sales. Crows and Port members get in for nothing as part of their package and still they don't come or they don't even seem to pass on there tickets for others to use.
by therisingblues » Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:00 pm
Magellan wrote:Hazydog wrote:head in the sand attitudes re change will almost certainly speed up the demise of the comp we love.
Agreed. But individual clubs undertake such significant shifts by themselves. It has to come from the top, and sadly I just can't see the SANFL giving enough of a shit to care.
by Hazydog » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:07 pm
Magellan wrote:Hazydog wrote:head in the sand attitudes re change will almost certainly speed up the demise of the comp we love.
Agreed. But individual clubs undertake such significant shifts by themselves. It has to come from the top, and sadly I just can't see the SANFL giving enough of a shit to care.
by Magellan » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:14 pm
therisingblues wrote:Magellan wrote:Hazydog wrote:head in the sand attitudes re change will almost certainly speed up the demise of the comp we love.
Agreed. But individual clubs undertake such significant shifts by themselves. It has to come from the top, and sadly I just can't see the SANFL giving enough of a shit to care.
How much of a shit does one need to give to show that one cares, exactly?
by Mic » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:35 pm
by PhilH » Wed Feb 08, 2017 8:57 pm
by whufc » Thu Feb 09, 2017 6:00 am
by Ian » Thu Feb 09, 2017 6:17 am
by Hazydog » Thu Feb 09, 2017 11:13 am
whufc wrote:State league football will be dead in 5 years
by MW » Thu Feb 09, 2017 11:22 am
Hazydog wrote:whufc wrote:State league football will be dead in 5 years
But on a brighter note the Women's comp is going gangbusters!
by therisingblues » Thu Feb 09, 2017 12:47 pm
Ian wrote:The other State Leagues died earlier than the SANFL, Cows and Powa ressies was the final nail here
by MW » Thu Feb 09, 2017 12:52 pm
by Wedgie » Thu Feb 09, 2017 1:08 pm
MW wrote:If the evidence was so clear that AFL reserves sides have killed other local comps, why would the SANFL agree to it? Effectively signing a death warrant no?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |