by Footy Chick » Sun Apr 09, 2017 7:14 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Wilbur » Sun Apr 09, 2017 8:22 pm
Trader wrote:jo172 wrote:Should Jobe Watson, Patrick Ryder etc be subject to life bans?
I'm not sure, but I do think its an interesting question.
Rules say if you've missed 12 games, we will de-register you.
Player is suspended from playing for a period greater than 12 games, but is allowed to play on after serving his ban.
I'm not saying if it's right or wrong, but I do find it interesting that we count games for some things, but not others.
Yes, Brunoli's suspension came from an infringement in another sport, but it was considered relevant enough for him to miss 2 years of SAAFL.
In some ways its similar to the rosewater lads who copped games for a picture on facebook. Those games count towards their 12 match limit.
Once again, not saying if it should or shouldn't count, but it is an interesting situation if you ask me.
by heater31 » Sun Apr 09, 2017 8:33 pm
Wilbur wrote:Trader wrote:jo172 wrote:Should Jobe Watson, Patrick Ryder etc be subject to life bans?
I'm not sure, but I do think its an interesting question.
Rules say if you've missed 12 games, we will de-register you.
Player is suspended from playing for a period greater than 12 games, but is allowed to play on after serving his ban.
I'm not saying if it's right or wrong, but I do find it interesting that we count games for some things, but not others.
Yes, Brunoli's suspension came from an infringement in another sport, but it was considered relevant enough for him to miss 2 years of SAAFL.
In some ways its similar to the rosewater lads who copped games for a picture on facebook. Those games count towards their 12 match limit.
Once again, not saying if it should or shouldn't count, but it is an interesting situation if you ask me.
What a joke that was. Not only did the publisher of the photo get (what I'm led to believe was) a season ban, but the people in it also copped a few games. How were they to know what purpose the photo would be used?
Surely the league has been a bit precious with this. The post was from a private fb page, not one that was club endorsed or the like.
I'm not sure that a SANFL or AFL player would cop such a ban for the same conduct.
Game bans for off-field conduct does not sit well with me.
by Footy Chick » Sun Apr 09, 2017 8:46 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Gazza's Scalp » Sun Apr 09, 2017 9:14 pm
Footy Chick wrote:These bans were sanctioned by ASADA, not the AFL or any subsequent footy league and therefore wouldn't count, I'd say...
by jo172 » Sun Apr 09, 2017 9:30 pm
Trader wrote:jo172 wrote:Should Jobe Watson, Patrick Ryder etc be subject to life bans?
I'm not sure, but I do think its an interesting question.
Rules say if you've missed 12 games, we will de-register you.
Player is suspended from playing for a period greater than 12 games, but is allowed to play on after serving his ban.
I'm not saying if it's right or wrong, but I do find it interesting that we count games for some things, but not others.
Yes, Brunoli's suspension came from an infringement in another sport, but it was considered relevant enough for him to miss 2 years of SAAFL.
In some ways its similar to the rosewater lads who copped games for a picture on facebook. Those games count towards their 12 match limit.
Once again, not saying if it should or shouldn't count, but it is an interesting situation if you ask me.
by jo172 » Sun Apr 09, 2017 9:33 pm
Gazza's Scalp wrote:Footy Chick wrote:These bans were sanctioned by ASADA, not the AFL or any subsequent footy league and therefore wouldn't count, I'd say...
I agree that Brunoli (and Essendon players) are different as they are bans imposed by someone external to the AFL. Tuck's however was a 12 game suspension because of the AFL three strike rule.
I didn't realise AFL games are halved. Is it half for SANFL or are they game for game?
by Mr Beefy » Sun Apr 09, 2017 9:42 pm
Trader wrote:jo172 wrote:Should Jobe Watson, Patrick Ryder etc be subject to life bans?
I'm not sure, but I do think its an interesting question.
Rules say if you've missed 12 games, we will de-register you.
Player is suspended from playing for a period greater than 12 games, but is allowed to play on after serving his ban.
I'm not saying if it's right or wrong, but I do find it interesting that we count games for some things, but not others.
Yes, Brunoli's suspension came from an infringement in another sport, but it was considered relevant enough for him to miss 2 years of SAAFL.
In some ways its similar to the rosewater lads who copped games for a picture on facebook. Those games count towards their 12 match limit.
Once again, not saying if it should or shouldn't count, but it is an interesting situation if you ask me.
by Spangas » Tue May 02, 2017 2:34 pm
Wilbur wrote: The post was from a private fb page, not one that was club endorsed or the like.
by ROOBOY18 » Mon May 08, 2017 10:51 pm
by Footy Chick » Mon May 08, 2017 10:57 pm
ROOBOY18 wrote:Anyone know what year did the deregistration rule come in?
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by ROOBOY18 » Tue May 09, 2017 7:54 am
Footy Chick wrote:ROOBOY18 wrote:Anyone know what year did the deregistration rule come in?
Yep, it was end of 2007, it was brought in as a result of our 2005 GF
by turk186 » Tue May 09, 2017 8:25 am
ROOBOY18 wrote:Footy Chick wrote:ROOBOY18 wrote:Anyone know what year did the deregistration rule come in?
Yep, it was end of 2007, it was brought in as a result of our 2005 GF
Cheers FC, so my understanding is that if you happened to be suspended for a total of 16 game before the start of 2008 season you are free to play, however 1 more suspension after that and you get deregistered....does this sound right????
by ROOBOY18 » Tue May 09, 2017 10:41 am
turk186 wrote:ROOBOY18 wrote:Footy Chick wrote:ROOBOY18 wrote:Anyone know what year did the deregistration rule come in?
Yep, it was end of 2007, it was brought in as a result of our 2005 GF
Cheers FC, so my understanding is that if you happened to be suspended for a total of 16 game before the start of 2008 season you are free to play, however 1 more suspension after that and you get deregistered....does this sound right????
No It was retrospective .. we had a player banned for life for more than 12 games suspended in his playing history,,, Shadiac and Co. even leaked it to the media before the player was informed. he in fact found out reading it in the paper.... very poor
by Footy Chick » Tue May 09, 2017 11:01 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Lightning McQueen » Tue May 09, 2017 12:52 pm
Footy Chick wrote:What's triggered the sudden interest Rooboy? The 12 game rule doesn't apply out at Plains league, does it? Only the AFL imposed 16 game ban would I gather?
by Lightning McQueen » Tue May 09, 2017 12:53 pm
by Look Good In Leather » Tue May 09, 2017 1:37 pm
Wilbur wrote:Trader wrote:jo172 wrote:Should Jobe Watson, Patrick Ryder etc be subject to life bans?
I'm not sure, but I do think its an interesting question.
Rules say if you've missed 12 games, we will de-register you.
Player is suspended from playing for a period greater than 12 games, but is allowed to play on after serving his ban.
I'm not saying if it's right or wrong, but I do find it interesting that we count games for some things, but not others.
Yes, Brunoli's suspension came from an infringement in another sport, but it was considered relevant enough for him to miss 2 years of SAAFL.
In some ways its similar to the rosewater lads who copped games for a picture on facebook. Those games count towards their 12 match limit.
Once again, not saying if it should or shouldn't count, but it is an interesting situation if you ask me.
What a joke that was. Not only did the publisher of the photo get (what I'm led to believe was) a season ban, but the people in it also copped a few games. How were they to know what purpose the photo would be used?
Surely the league has been a bit precious with this. The post was from a private fb page, not one that was club endorsed or the like.
I'm not sure that a SANFL or AFL player would cop such a ban for the same conduct.
Game bans for off-field conduct does not sit well with me.
by VALE PARK » Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:57 pm
by jo172 » Tue Aug 01, 2017 4:00 pm
VALE PARK wrote:Looks like no reports this week.
None on tribunal site Tuesday arvo.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |