by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon May 22, 2017 2:23 pm
by Bum Crack » Mon May 22, 2017 2:27 pm
valleys07 wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:We don't lose to Port either. Only one loss since 119.regards,REB
Sadly.
Only 1 win at Kardinia in 10 years, and on the 10 year anniversary of the aforementioned massacre, Port will need to produce something special to win on Thursday night.
by valleys07 » Mon May 22, 2017 2:47 pm
Bum Crack wrote:valleys07 wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:We don't lose to Port either. Only one loss since 119.regards,REB
Sadly.
Only 1 win at Kardinia in 10 years, and on the 10 year anniversary of the aforementioned massacre, Port will need to produce something special to win on Thursday night.
Motorcade before the game for 2007 premiership team I believe. The boys will be pretty pumped up to have a win for all of those legends. If Port get up Thursday night, I will be happy to say they are the real deal.
by Booney » Mon May 22, 2017 3:25 pm
by Bum Crack » Mon May 22, 2017 3:36 pm
Booney wrote:Good points, but Zac Smith is a spud against quality ruckman and Ryder will have his own way at the ruck contests this week. Port don't play wide, so whatever stadium it's called now won't hurt us as it hurts sides who try to run down the wings. Geelong boxed the Dogs in on Friday night, we like to run through the middle so not as much of a concern for us. When the Dogs were brave and direct ( 3rd quarter ) they piled on the sausage rolls.
I'm quite bullish about our chances.
Can't wait for Selwood/Selwood/Dangerfield v Wines/Ebert/SPP don't go in there if you're faint hearted.
by MW » Mon May 22, 2017 5:14 pm
Booney wrote:Good points, but Zac Smith is a spud against quality ruckman and Ryder will have his own way at the ruck contests this week. Port don't play wide, so whatever stadium it's called now won't hurt us as it hurts sides who try to run down the wings. Geelong boxed the Dogs in on Friday night, we like to run through the middle so not as much of a concern for us. When the Dogs were brave and direct ( 3rd quarter ) they piled on the sausage rolls.
I'm quite bullish about our chances.
Can't wait for Selwood/Selwood/Dangerfield v Wines/Ebert/SPP don't go in there if you're faint hearted.
by Bum Crack » Mon May 22, 2017 5:15 pm
MW wrote:Booney wrote:Good points, but Zac Smith is a spud against quality ruckman and Ryder will have his own way at the ruck contests this week. Port don't play wide, so whatever stadium it's called now won't hurt us as it hurts sides who try to run down the wings. Geelong boxed the Dogs in on Friday night, we like to run through the middle so not as much of a concern for us. When the Dogs were brave and direct ( 3rd quarter ) they piled on the sausage rolls.
I'm quite bullish about our chances.
Can't wait for Selwood/Selwood/Dangerfield v Wines/Ebert/SPP don't go in there if you're faint hearted.
I'm more than bullish...they will win Port.
by stan » Mon May 22, 2017 5:55 pm
MW wrote:Booney wrote:Good points, but Zac Smith is a spud against quality ruckman and Ryder will have his own way at the ruck contests this week. Port don't play wide, so whatever stadium it's called now won't hurt us as it hurts sides who try to run down the wings. Geelong boxed the Dogs in on Friday night, we like to run through the middle so not as much of a concern for us. When the Dogs were brave and direct ( 3rd quarter ) they piled on the sausage rolls.
I'm quite bullish about our chances.
Can't wait for Selwood/Selwood/Dangerfield v Wines/Ebert/SPP don't go in there if you're faint hearted.
I'm more than bullish...they will win Port.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon May 22, 2017 6:45 pm
by daysofourlives » Mon May 22, 2017 6:52 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Wowee.
Im not sure the new stand 'got the boys up'...i think they had to respond and would have no matter where the match was.
Cats will win by a comfy 'beans in your coffee' 43pts
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon May 22, 2017 6:54 pm
daysofourlives wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Wowee.
Im not sure the new stand 'got the boys up'...i think they had to respond and would have no matter where the match was.
Cats will win by a comfy 'beans in your coffee' 43pts
Thats enough for me to go and load up on the Power
by Rik E Boy » Mon May 22, 2017 11:07 pm
Booney wrote:Good points, but Zac Smith is a spud against quality ruckman and Ryder will have his own way at the ruck contests this week. Port don't play wide, so whatever stadium it's called now won't hurt us as it hurts sides who try to run down the wings. Geelong boxed the Dogs in on Friday night, we like to run through the middle so not as much of a concern for us. When the Dogs were brave and direct ( 3rd quarter ) they piled on the sausage rolls.
I'm quite bullish about our chances.
Can't wait for Selwood/Selwood/Dangerfield v Wines/Ebert/SPP don't go in there if you're faint hearted.
by Booney » Tue May 23, 2017 8:55 am
Rik E Boy wrote:Booney wrote:Good points, but Zac Smith is a spud against quality ruckman and Ryder will have his own way at the ruck contests this week. Port don't play wide, so whatever stadium it's called now won't hurt us as it hurts sides who try to run down the wings. Geelong boxed the Dogs in on Friday night, we like to run through the middle so not as much of a concern for us. When the Dogs were brave and direct ( 3rd quarter ) they piled on the sausage rolls.
I'm quite bullish about our chances.
Can't wait for Selwood/Selwood/Dangerfield v Wines/Ebert/SPP don't go in there if you're faint hearted.
Couldn't win on your own deck against Jonathan Giles who is a far bigger spud than Smith. Cats by 25.
regards,
REB
by MW » Tue May 23, 2017 8:58 am
stan wrote:MW wrote:Booney wrote:Good points, but Zac Smith is a spud against quality ruckman and Ryder will have his own way at the ruck contests this week. Port don't play wide, so whatever stadium it's called now won't hurt us as it hurts sides who try to run down the wings. Geelong boxed the Dogs in on Friday night, we like to run through the middle so not as much of a concern for us. When the Dogs were brave and direct ( 3rd quarter ) they piled on the sausage rolls.
I'm quite bullish about our chances.
Can't wait for Selwood/Selwood/Dangerfield v Wines/Ebert/SPP don't go in there if you're faint hearted.
I'm more than bullish...they will win Port.
You ok there MW?
Have you been drinking?
by stan » Tue May 23, 2017 9:26 am
Rik E Boy wrote:Booney wrote:Good points, but Zac Smith is a spud against quality ruckman and Ryder will have his own way at the ruck contests this week. Port don't play wide, so whatever stadium it's called now won't hurt us as it hurts sides who try to run down the wings. Geelong boxed the Dogs in on Friday night, we like to run through the middle so not as much of a concern for us. When the Dogs were brave and direct ( 3rd quarter ) they piled on the sausage rolls.
I'm quite bullish about our chances.
Can't wait for Selwood/Selwood/Dangerfield v Wines/Ebert/SPP don't go in there if you're faint hearted.
Couldn't win on your own deck against Jonathan Giles who is a far bigger spud than Smith. Cats by 25.
regards,
REB
by Booney » Tue May 23, 2017 9:28 am
by Bum Crack » Tue May 23, 2017 10:26 am
Booney wrote:Prance. Nice.
I think it was in the third quarter last week, Smith had two helpers in the defensive goal square and managed to drop a sitter and hand a goal to Redpath. Classic Smith.
by Booney » Tue May 23, 2017 10:53 am
Bum Crack wrote:Booney wrote:Prance. Nice.
I think it was in the third quarter last week, Smith had two helpers in the defensive goal square and managed to drop a sitter and hand a goal to Redpath. Classic Smith.
I haven't seen Booney this confident since the end of the 2007 minor round.
by stan » Tue May 23, 2017 11:15 am
by valleys07 » Tue May 23, 2017 11:19 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Wowee.
Im not sure the new stand 'got the boys up'...i think they had to respond and would have no matter where the match was.
Cats will win by a comfy 'beans in your coffee' 43pts
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |