Bum Crack wrote:Actually, that does make you look like a whinging bitch Booney
$380 per night, things should be pretty spot on. I've stayed in rooms for around $100 per night that were more satisfactory.
by Booney » Mon May 29, 2017 5:21 pm
Bum Crack wrote:Actually, that does make you look like a whinging bitch Booney
by Booney » Mon May 29, 2017 5:22 pm
MW wrote:Most critiqued post in SA Footy history ffs
by Spargo » Mon May 29, 2017 5:24 pm
by MW » Mon May 29, 2017 5:24 pm
Booney wrote:MW wrote:Most critiqued post in SA Footy history ffs
Considering it's a matter of personal opinion and it was me there on Saturday night makes it fairly interesting, does it not?
by Booney » Mon May 29, 2017 5:25 pm
bennymacca wrote:tbh it seems like one of those reviews where there really was some issues, but then you decided to nit pick on absolutely everything - which, instead of highlighting the actual issues, makes you seem entitled.
by bennymacca » Mon May 29, 2017 5:26 pm
by Booney » Mon May 29, 2017 5:28 pm
bennymacca wrote:dont know any of the owners, stayed there in march. was my 10 year wedding anniversary so that may have something to do with the good memories
didnt mean to offend or over critique, as i said im bored.
by amber_fluid » Mon May 29, 2017 5:30 pm
Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:tbh it seems like one of those reviews where there really was some issues, but then you decided to nit pick on absolutely everything - which, instead of highlighting the actual issues, makes you seem entitled.
Of course I am, I coughed up $380 ******* dollars to be entitled, the whole ******* point! lol
by Booney » Mon May 29, 2017 5:31 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:tbh it seems like one of those reviews where there really was some issues, but then you decided to nit pick on absolutely everything - which, instead of highlighting the actual issues, makes you seem entitled.
Of course I am, I coughed up $380 ******* dollars to be entitled, the whole ******* point! lol
I'm guessing you didn't get lucky with the missus after your Saturday arvo drinking sesh and went to be hungry?
Is that what this is really all about it?
by bennymacca » Mon May 29, 2017 5:32 pm
Booney wrote:@bennymacca
Re : crocs and socks, fair enough, but would you greet someone like that? No, you're better than that, so am I.
we got shown around by a bloke in painting clothes hehe. didn't bother me tbh
Re : breakfast between 9 and 10 - As much how it was delivered as the actual news, as in, don't ask for anything other than between 9 and 10. you'll get a no. fair enough, ill pay that.
Re : the decor / bathroom, not a complaint, observation.
Re : Sensor light - Yeah, we closed the curtains. I drove a car there, I'm not a ******* idiot and can capably close curtains. Insufficient to block out the light.
Re : Pillows and robes. The staff all ****** off at 5pm, there was nobody there to go and speak to! first thing i usually do is open up every cupboard just to look around etc hehe.
Re : Dinner. Fair play. However the Pavillion and kitchen looked set up for meals, should have looked into it, wasn't something I thought we'd need to do.
Re : Breakfast. Was pretty clear the chick making breakfast was cleaning up in the kitchen. The emphasis on the "10 guests" was reflective of there being 10 eggs, 10 sausages, 10 tomato's in the bain marie.
$380 per night and I'm turning fridges off, trying to fix their shitter just so I can get to sleep and I'm whinging? my point was, this is absolutely worth complaining about, and worth giving a bad review for. the other stuff wouldnt have rated a mention had you not had to put up with this. so it clouds the actual complaint. which is 100% justified
How long ago did you stay there?
amber_fluid wrote:I'm guessing you didn't get lucky with the missus after your Saturday arvo drinking sesh and went to bed hungry?
Is that what this is really all about it?
by amber_fluid » Mon May 29, 2017 5:34 pm
Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:tbh it seems like one of those reviews where there really was some issues, but then you decided to nit pick on absolutely everything - which, instead of highlighting the actual issues, makes you seem entitled.
Of course I am, I coughed up $380 ******* dollars to be entitled, the whole ******* point! lol
I'm guessing you didn't get lucky with the missus after your Saturday arvo drinking sesh and went to be hungry?
Is that what this is really all about it?
100% disposal efficiency. 2 straight from two touches.
by HH3 » Mon May 29, 2017 5:35 pm
by bennymacca » Mon May 29, 2017 5:36 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:
100% disposal efficiency. 2 straight from two touches.
What are you f**king whinging about then.
I'd be booking my return trip ASAP.
HH3 wrote:Benny, you're whole argument went out the window when you used "hehe" in a sentence.
Case dismissed.
by HH3 » Mon May 29, 2017 5:39 pm
bennymacca wrote:hehe is the new haha which is the new lol.
by bennymacca » Mon May 29, 2017 5:41 pm
HH3 wrote:bennymacca wrote:hehe is the new haha which is the new lol.
Nope. "Hehe" is what 13 year old girls use when they're talking about a boy they like.
Also, if any grown man uses "bahaha" they're dead to me.
by HH3 » Mon May 29, 2017 5:43 pm
bennymacca wrote:HH3 wrote:bennymacca wrote:hehe is the new haha which is the new lol.
Nope. "Hehe" is what 13 year old girls use when they're talking about a boy they like.
Also, if any grown man uses "bahaha" they're dead to me.
https://www.theverge.com/2015/8/10/9125 ... e-facebook
by bennymacca » Mon May 29, 2017 5:45 pm
by HH3 » Mon May 29, 2017 6:13 pm
by Spargo » Mon May 29, 2017 9:20 pm
by Booney » Tue May 30, 2017 7:53 am
Spargo wrote:Anyone tried Nino's at Victor Harbour?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |