by amber_fluid » Sun Sep 24, 2017 11:33 am
by Wedgie » Sun Sep 24, 2017 11:36 am
amber_fluid wrote:Good to see Benny and Wedgie with your rose coloured glasses clearly on.
Both should get off IMO but I don't think one was worse than the other though.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by amber_fluid » Sun Sep 24, 2017 11:39 am
Wedgie wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Good to see Benny and Wedgie with your rose coloured glasses clearly on.
Both should get off IMO but I don't think one was worse than the other though.
Rose coloured glasses?
I'm a much bigger Sloane fan than Cotchin.
Its just a fact that one was going for the ball and the other wasnt, you only have to watch the vision of both and see where the ball was.
Dangerfield had already handpassed it before he got hit, Cotchin went for the ball and got it.
Once again tbey both should get off but the two incidents arent comparable because of where the ball was.
by Wedgie » Sun Sep 24, 2017 11:42 am
amber_fluid wrote:Wedgie wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Good to see Benny and Wedgie with your rose coloured glasses clearly on.
Both should get off IMO but I don't think one was worse than the other though.
Rose coloured glasses?
I'm a much bigger Sloane fan than Cotchin.
Its just a fact that one was going for the ball and the other wasnt, you only have to watch the vision of both and see where the ball was.
Dangerfield had already handpassed it before he got hit, Cotchin went for the ball and got it.
Once again tbey both should get off but the two incidents arent comparable because of where the ball was.
Who Sloane hit isn't clouding your judgement
Let's hope both get off as you want to see the best players playing in the last week of September.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by cracka » Sun Sep 24, 2017 11:51 am
Wedgie wrote:I think both should get off but Sloanes is clearly worse than Cotchins. Cotchin just goes for the ball where Sloane hit Dangerfield after thr ball was gone and he was going for the player. Once again, both should get off.
by JK » Sun Sep 24, 2017 11:55 am
by woodublieve12 » Sun Sep 24, 2017 11:56 am
bennymacca wrote:amber_fluid wrote:If either Cotchin or Sloane were to be suspended which I hope either aren't, then double or triple it and make them serve it next year.
No one deserves to miss a GF for those minor indiscretions.
I don’t think cotchin should be suspended, but if he does, he has no one to blame but himself for doing stupid shit earlier in the year.
If anyone thinks Sloane has a case to answer they are either trolling or deadset cooked
by Wedgie » Sun Sep 24, 2017 11:57 am
cracka wrote:Wedgie wrote:I think both should get off but Sloanes is clearly worse than Cotchins. Cotchin just goes for the ball where Sloane hit Dangerfield after thr ball was gone and he was going for the player. Once again, both should get off.
Sloane didn't hit Dangerfield. They ran into each other. If anything Danger should get done for playing for a free kick.
Cotchin was going for the ball. Was the perfect hard ball get.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by cracka » Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:00 pm
Wedgie wrote:cracka wrote:Wedgie wrote:I think both should get off but Sloanes is clearly worse than Cotchins. Cotchin just goes for the ball where Sloane hit Dangerfield after thr ball was gone and he was going for the player. Once again, both should get off.
Sloane didn't hit Dangerfield. They ran into each other. If anything Danger should get done for playing for a free kick.
Cotchin was going for the ball. Was the perfect hard ball get.
LMAO, Danger had the ball handpassed it and was wide open, if you think that it doesn't hurt when you get hit high, front on and hard when wide open you have absolutely no idea about the game my friend.
by Wedgie » Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:06 pm
cracka wrote:Wedgie wrote:cracka wrote:Wedgie wrote:I think both should get off but Sloanes is clearly worse than Cotchins. Cotchin just goes for the ball where Sloane hit Dangerfield after thr ball was gone and he was going for the player. Once again, both should get off.
Sloane didn't hit Dangerfield. They ran into each other. If anything Danger should get done for playing for a free kick.
Cotchin was going for the ball. Was the perfect hard ball get.
LMAO, Danger had the ball handpassed it and was wide open, if you think that it doesn't hurt when you get hit high, front on and hard when wide open you have absolutely no idea about the game my friend.
Sloane got up straight away. If you think Danger wasn't playing for the free kick then you also have absolutely no idea about the game my friend.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by cracka » Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:23 pm
by cracka » Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:26 pm
cracka wrote:Wedgie wrote:cracka wrote:Wedgie wrote:I think both should get off but Sloanes is clearly worse than Cotchins. Cotchin just goes for the ball where Sloane hit Dangerfield after thr ball was gone and he was going for the player. Once again, both should get off.
Sloane didn't hit Dangerfield. They ran into each other. If anything Danger should get done for playing for a free kick.
Cotchin was going for the ball. Was the perfect hard ball get.
LMAO, Danger had the ball handpassed it and was wide open, if you think that it doesn't hurt when you get hit high, front on and hard when wide open you have absolutely no idea about the game my friend.
Sloane got up straight away. If you think Danger wasn't playing for the free kick then you also have absolutely no idea about the game my friend.
Wedgie wrote:Of course Sloane got up straight away, he lined a player up and bumped him beautifully after bracing himself for the hit where Danger didn't have time to brace himself for the impact as he was solely intent on getting the handpass away. 90% of players would have taken a lot longer to get up after being winded like that!
At the end of the day it wasn't even a free kick, it was a great bump as the ball was within 5 metres.
Surely Crows supporters can stop whinging and booing and actually enjoy one of the best weeks of their life now. Lifes too short and weeks like this are few and far between for a lot of people!
by whufc » Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:27 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:32 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by cracka » Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:34 pm
whufc wrote:I can't believe Wedgie is having to justify this!!!
**** me Crows supporters have no idea
Sloane shouldn't get reported, it wasn't even a free kick but Sloane was always going to come off best in that situation
Dangerfield was wide and open and in a lower body position
by whufc » Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:03 pm
Wedgie wrote:I cant believe whufc is on my side after what Spurs did to the Hammers last night.
Anyway Im off to work at the Oval, my last gig for a while! Have a good day all!
by whufc » Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:05 pm
cracka wrote:whufc wrote:I can't believe Wedgie is having to justify this!!!
**** me Crows supporters have no idea
Sloane shouldn't get reported, it wasn't even a free kick but Sloane was always going to come off best in that situation
Dangerfield was wide and open and in a lower body position
Do you think Sloanes was worse than Cotchins
by Robran » Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:16 pm
by daysofourlives » Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:35 pm
bennymacca wrote:amber_fluid wrote:If either Cotchin or Sloane were to be suspended which I hope either aren't, then double or triple it and make them serve it next year.
No one deserves to miss a GF for those minor indiscretions.
I don’t think cotchin should be suspended, but if he does, he has no one to blame but himself for doing stupid shit earlier in the year.
If anyone thinks Sloane has a case to answer they are either trolling or deadset cooked
by Corona Man » Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:36 pm
daysofourlives wrote:bennymacca wrote:amber_fluid wrote:If either Cotchin or Sloane were to be suspended which I hope either aren't, then double or triple it and make them serve it next year.
No one deserves to miss a GF for those minor indiscretions.
I don’t think cotchin should be suspended, but if he does, he has no one to blame but himself for doing stupid shit earlier in the year.
If anyone thinks Sloane has a case to answer they are either trolling or deadset cooked
Just the standard response from Benny when someone doesnt agree with him
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |