Port Adelaide 2018

[MW]

Apparently the unley faithful have welcomed SPP back to footy...

[locky801]

Apparently the unley faithful have welcomed SPP back to footy...

Just preparing from what he will probably get around the country

[stan]

Apparently the unley faithful have welcomed SPP back to footy...

Just preparing from what he will probably get around the country

I thought that would have been guaranteed. I mean its Sturt supporters we are talking about here.

[RustyCage]

I think once again this a case of us having know idea what happened. No doubt Port are the closest to knowing the true story.

Have heard rumours from mates who supposedly at said venue that they believe this is alledgedly 'strike one.'

The AFL, The AFLPA, PAFC and the clubs QC’s have all studied the entire footage from the night and found no evidence of anything alleged against SPP having actually happened.

According to someone “in the know” at the game today (aka someone from the club I was walking behind on the way back to the car), the AFL were pushing for the 3 game suspension to a start now, and if that happened, Port were going to fight it all the way. The suspension being backdated as was much as Port were willing to accept

[RustyCage]

Apparently the unley faithful have welcomed SPP back to footy...

Funnily enough it took the morons a whole quarter to realise SPP and Crompton weren’t the same person. For the whole game they were yelling out crap about Pittard any time Leinert went near the ball. A simple bunch at Unley

[DOC]

I think once again this a case of us having know idea what happened. No doubt Port are the closest to knowing the true story.

Have heard rumours from mates who supposedly at said venue that they believe this is alledgedly 'strike one.'

The AFL, The AFLPA, PAFC and the clubs QC’s have all studied the entire footage from the night and found no evidence of anything alleged against SPP having actually happened.

According to someone “in the know” at the game today (aka someone from the club I was walking behind on the way back to the car), the AFL were pushing for the 3 game suspension to a start now, and if that happened, Port were going to fight it all the way. The suspension being backdated as was much as Port were willing to accept

Not according to the AFL report:

"Port Adelaide player Sam Powell-Pepper has been suspended for another week after the AFL found he inappropriately touched a woman at an Adelaide bar while he was drunk."

[Wedgie]

If the Power don't appeal the decision it must be true that he assaulted a young lady. Over to you Power......

[Spargo]

the AFL were pushing for the 3 game suspension to a start now, and if that happened, Port were going to fight it all the way. The suspension being backdated as was much as Port were willing to accept

Let me get this straight. Port were going to fight it “all the way” if the AFL said 3 more games from now, but are willing to accept only 1 week more now?
Weren’t we told that Port were backing him in?
Accepting the 1 week is an admission, no?

[Spargo]

Can someone tell me the difference between “inappropriate contact” and sexual assault?

[stan]

Can someone tell me the difference between “inappropriate contact” and sexual assault?

Yeah thats a good question. Its all full of jargon at the moment.

[RustyCage]

Ah yes, I misread that

From Ports statement:

“Of most importance to Sam, the AFLPA and the Port Adelaide Football Club was the AFL’s finding that there was no evidence or suggestion of sexual or indecent assault, as has been speculated by some media outlets throughout the investigation. “

[RustyCage]

the AFL were pushing for the 3 game suspension to a start now, and if that happened, Port were going to fight it all the way. The suspension being backdated as was much as Port were willing to accept

Let me get this straight. Port were going to fight it “all the way” if the AFL said 3 more games from now, but are willing to accept only 1 week more now?
Weren’t we told that Port were backing him in?
Accepting the 1 week is an admission, no?

It’s all a bit odd

[Brodlach]

That is interesting, so what else has he done that hasn’t been released? You don’t get a 3 week ban by the AFL for being out late and drunk only

[RustyCage]

According to this list, you can do a lot and not get suspended!

[Brodlach]

Which is why the rumour post earlier in the thread MAY have some substance. Hope not for the kids sake

[RustyCage]

Press conference tomorrow where Port will release more info

[LMA]

Can someone tell me the difference between “inappropriate contact” and sexual assault?

Yeah thats a good question. Its all full of jargon at the moment.

Because there was never any REAL police involvement, just AFLPD or CSI Docklands, would be my guess on the difference in wording.

[MW]

According to this list, you can do a lot and not get suspended!

Why is there no proof with SPP? because a camera didn't film it?
What does listing other indiscretions prove?

[LMA]

According to this list, you can do a lot and not get suspended!

Grabbing an ass is unknown territory, surprised the RSPCA didn't get involved

[LMA]

According to this list, you can do a lot and not get suspended!

Why is there no proof with SPP? because a camera didn't film it?
What does listing other indiscretions prove?

Ummm inconsistency and Jaensch is a loose c**t