by Dutchy » Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:18 am
by Booney » Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:31 pm
Dutchy wrote:Fraser Evans is building quite a resume, would be worth a crack at a higher level as a mature aged rookie I would have thought.
by CUTTERMAN » Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:40 pm
Dutchy wrote:Fraser Evans is building quite a resume, would be worth a crack at a higher level as a mature aged rookie I would have thought.
by Booney » Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:02 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Dutchy wrote:Fraser Evans is building quite a resume, would be worth a crack at a higher level as a mature aged rookie I would have thought.
Fraser probably has the best kick in the comp over 40m-50m and consistently hits up a team mate 50m away, it’s a huge weapon coming out of defence. As has been mentioned I’d say both Fraser and Jack Stephens have missed the AFL boat but Evans has an AFL standard leg on him.
Sturt still have Sutcliffe, Hansen, Taggert and Sumner to come back into the team. Good to see Leinert and Trengove best for Port, Sturt guns, it’s the best game I’ve seen Irra play also.
by The Dark Knight » Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:19 pm
Irra was excellent in trying to take the game in the last half, the game was out of reach and he did make some mistakes but at least he was trying to create some kind of spark. And his mistakes didn't look that bad compared to some otlf the other mistakes made gifting Sturt goals.Booney wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Dutchy wrote:Fraser Evans is building quite a resume, would be worth a crack at a higher level as a mature aged rookie I would have thought.
Fraser probably has the best kick in the comp over 40m-50m and consistently hits up a team mate 50m away, it’s a huge weapon coming out of defence. As has been mentioned I’d say both Fraser and Jack Stephens have missed the AFL boat but Evans has an AFL standard leg on him.
Sturt still have Sutcliffe, Hansen, Taggert and Sumner to come back into the team. Good to see Leinert and Trengove best for Port, Sturt guns, it’s the best game I’ve seen Irra play also.
Irra was one of the defenders who bucked the game plan and took the game on, clearly his best game in the black and white.
Not questioning Fraser one bit, he takes plenty of contested marks, but he does however play the role of third man / loose man and has the luxury of time and space to use the ball quite often in Mattner's game style.
by UK Fan » Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:33 pm
Booney wrote:UK Fan wrote:Booney wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Great day to celebrate 50 years since our 68 flag and good to get to The President’s Lunch before the game. Great crowd and turnout, even about 8 people up on a house roof at the northern end like the old days.
Not sure how Pickled Pear can be eligible to play today, pretty poor form by Port and the AFL. I thought SANFL clubs get fined if they field a player that wasn’t listed in the initial squad.
Great win Blues.
As the AFL suspension relates to off field matters the suspension doesn't cover the SANFL, under current rules which seems farcical. If you're suspended, you're suspended, but,under current SANFL rules if an AFL listed player is available and eligible to play, he must, it's sort of the "play to the line" rule, so the SANFL are as confused as the AFL are on this one.
I believe the fine will be $500.
Farcical as you say. Club imposed suspensions fair enough AFL imposed must cross all codes in the future
If he’s guilty of what he’s been charged with as the afl is stating why is he playing any footy at all ???
"Inappropriate contact", what's fair you reckon, 20 years non parole, life?
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by amber_fluid » Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:46 pm
by The Bedge » Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:49 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Yep if you’re suspended then you don’t play anywhere.
That’s bullsh*t he played in the sanfl
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by CUTTERMAN » Thu Apr 26, 2018 2:29 pm
Booney wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Great day to celebrate 50 years since our 68 flag and good to get to The President’s Lunch before the game. Great crowd and turnout, even about 8 people up on a house roof at the northern end like the old days.
Not sure how Pickled Pear can be eligible to play today, pretty poor form by Port and the AFL. I thought SANFL clubs get fined if they field a player that wasn’t listed in the initial squad.
Great win Blues.
As the AFL suspension relates to off field matters the suspension doesn't cover the SANFL, under current rules which seems farcical. If you're suspended, you're suspended, but,under current SANFL rules if an AFL listed player is available and eligible to play, he must, it's sort of the "play to the line" rule, so the SANFL are as confused as the AFL are on this one.
I believe the fine will be $500.
by Booney » Thu Apr 26, 2018 2:41 pm
by amber_fluid » Thu Apr 26, 2018 2:43 pm
by Booney » Thu Apr 26, 2018 2:54 pm
amber_fluid wrote:The PAFC know the rules, they should have never played SPP yesterday.
by amber_fluid » Thu Apr 26, 2018 2:57 pm
Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:The PAFC know the rules, they should have never played SPP yesterday.
LOL, that's why they did mate. The SANFL's rules state that if an AFL listed player is eligible and available he must play.
by CUTTERMAN » Thu Apr 26, 2018 2:58 pm
Booney wrote:Farcical by the AFL and spineless by the SANFL to say "Thanks, but no thanks" yesterday.
by Booney » Thu Apr 26, 2018 2:59 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:The PAFC know the rules, they should have never played SPP yesterday.
LOL, that's why they did mate. The SANFL's rules state that if an AFL listed player is eligible and available he must play.
He wasn’t listed on the team sheet?
What is the point of a team sheet being submitted if you just change it when you feel like it?
by CUTTERMAN » Thu Apr 26, 2018 2:59 pm
Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:The PAFC know the rules, they should have never played SPP yesterday.
LOL, that's why they did mate. The SANFL's rules state that if an AFL listed player is eligible and available he must play.
by Booney » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:01 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:The PAFC know the rules, they should have never played SPP yesterday.
LOL, that's why they did mate. The SANFL's rules state that if an AFL listed player is eligible and available he must play.
Not according to the rule change that allows Port to play Summerton to play even if there’s AFL listed players that can take his spot.
Which rule is it today?
by amber_fluid » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:03 pm
Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:The PAFC know the rules, they should have never played SPP yesterday.
LOL, that's why they did mate. The SANFL's rules state that if an AFL listed player is eligible and available he must play.
He wasn’t listed on the team sheet?
What is the point of a team sheet being submitted if you just change it when you feel like it?
Team sheet? I'd say he was.
In the named squad? i'd imagine he wasn't, thus the $500 fine.
Anyway, you're going at the wrong organisation here, it's the SANFL that should have stood up and said he wasn't allowed to play, it's their competition and their rules, our club, yours and mine, just followed the SANFL rules.
by CUTTERMAN » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:05 pm
Booney wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:The PAFC know the rules, they should have never played SPP yesterday.
LOL, that's why they did mate. The SANFL's rules state that if an AFL listed player is eligible and available he must play.
Not according to the rule change that allows Port to play Summerton to play even if there’s AFL listed players that can take his spot.
Which rule is it today?
Like I said mate, it's the SANFL putting the rules in place, not us.
by amber_fluid » Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:06 pm
Booney wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:The PAFC know the rules, they should have never played SPP yesterday.
LOL, that's why they did mate. The SANFL's rules state that if an AFL listed player is eligible and available he must play.
Not according to the rule change that allows Port to play Summerton to play even if there’s AFL listed players that can take his spot.
Which rule is it today?
Like I said mate, it's the SANFL putting the rules in place, not us.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |