Tony Clifton wrote:Don't think a ball can't be a no ball and a wide. Reckon it's whatever comes first and, from memory, a no ball trumps a wide if they happen at the same time (eg in the case of a wide full toss)
Correct, it can't be both. So in the example of a no-ball wide, it would be scored as 1 no ball and 4 byes.
A no-ball always trumps a wide (timing is irrelevant), as a no-ball is more punitive of the two for the fielding side.
IE: you can be stumped off a wide but not a no ball, so if its 'both' the umpire should call no-ball to ensure the batsman gets all the protection he should.