by amber_fluid » Thu Jan 31, 2019 2:59 pm
by HH3 » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:00 pm
Dutchy wrote:HH3 wrote:Put it this way...do you think cyclists would be happy for me to walk side by side with someone else in the bike lane, while there's heavy traffic and a separate footpath provided?
Not sure what your argument is? Are you Ok with bikes in a bike lane (if there is one)?
by Dutchy » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:00 pm
Footy Chick wrote:[
Everyone rants about rego - I dont think it's so much the rego as such - but more of some sort of identification system so that you can't get away with flouting road rules all the time
by Dutchy » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:01 pm
HH3 wrote:Dutchy wrote:HH3 wrote:Put it this way...do you think cyclists would be happy for me to walk side by side with someone else in the bike lane, while there's heavy traffic and a separate footpath provided?
Not sure what your argument is? Are you Ok with bikes in a bike lane (if there is one)?
Yeah of course I am.
I cant stand the dickheads that ride 5 wide on a Sunday morning.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:02 pm
Dutchy wrote:
The old rego argument is the funniest one. 95% of cyclists already pay rego as they drive cars!
Enforce a registration system and you will immediately reduce cyclists and increase cars on the road.
How does a 3yo register their bike?
by HH3 » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:02 pm
Dutchy wrote:HH3 wrote:Dutchy wrote:HH3 wrote:Put it this way...do you think cyclists would be happy for me to walk side by side with someone else in the bike lane, while there's heavy traffic and a separate footpath provided?
Not sure what your argument is? Are you Ok with bikes in a bike lane (if there is one)?
Yeah of course I am.
I cant stand the dickheads that ride 5 wide on a Sunday morning.
well we have no beef cause I agree with you
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:05 pm
by Booney » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:21 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Everyone rants about rego - I dont think it's so much the rego as such - but more of some sort of identification system so that you can't get away with flouting road rules all the time
by Booney » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:23 pm
Dutchy wrote:Brodlach wrote:Dutchy wrote:HH3 wrote:
Absolute f**kin scourge!
How dare people get off their couch and get fit as well as taking cars off the road.
Instead they just put bikes on the road and pay no rego
The old rego argument is the funniest one. 95% of cyclists already pay rego as they drive cars!
Enforce a registration system and you will immediately reduce cyclists and increase cars on the road.
How does a 3yo register their bike?
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:24 pm
Booney wrote:
Think about the wear and tear on the roads mate, come on.
by amber_fluid » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:25 pm
Booney wrote:Brodlach wrote:Dutchy wrote:HH3 wrote:Absolute f**kin scourge!
How dare people get off their couch and get fit as well as taking cars off the road.
Instead they just put bikes on the road and pay no rego
You can't seriously be arguing cyclists should pay rego?
I'd love for you to detail the pricing structure.
With or without basket costs
With or without spokey dokeys?
by Booney » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:26 pm
by HH3 » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:30 pm
Booney wrote:I've just read the last two pages and arrived at this conclusion.
They're just riding their ******* bike.
by amber_fluid » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:31 pm
HH3 wrote:Booney wrote:I've just read the last two pages and arrived at this conclusion.
They're just riding their ******* bike.
Well they're breaking the law, but ok.
by HH3 » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:33 pm
by Booney » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:33 pm
HH3 wrote:Booney wrote:I've just read the last two pages and arrived at this conclusion.
They're just riding their ******* bike.
Well they're breaking the law, but ok.
by Brodlach » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:33 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by HH3 » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:35 pm
Booney wrote:HH3 wrote:Booney wrote:I've just read the last two pages and arrived at this conclusion.
They're just riding their ******* bike.
Well they're breaking the law, but ok.
Riding a bike isn't against the law, some of them might be but pretty rough to tar every cyclist with the same brush, you anti-cyclite.
I'm more worried about **** wits on their phone driving, or pissed up clowns behind the wheel, meth'd up ferals.......
by amber_fluid » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:35 pm
Booney wrote:HH3 wrote:Booney wrote:I've just read the last two pages and arrived at this conclusion.
They're just riding their ******* bike.
Well they're breaking the law, but ok.
Riding a bike isn't against the law, some of them might be but pretty rough to tar every cyclist with the same brush, you anti-cyclite.
I'm more worried about **** wits on their phone driving, or pissed up clowns behind the wheel, meth'd up ferals.......
by Pseudo » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:40 pm
HH3 wrote:Put it this way...do you think cyclists would be happy for me to walk side by side with someone else in the bike lane, while there's heavy traffic and a separate footpath provided?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |