by helicopterking » Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:33 am
by Sonofbrowny25 » Mon Mar 25, 2019 11:55 am
helicopterking wrote:Fulham tried to use a Mispelt name from the team sheet as a technicality against Marion today .Also complained to umpires about Marion having a sub fielder and also about appealing to much.
Embarrassing if true.
by heater31 » Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:19 pm
Why not? They've been ****** over several times by technicalities or ridiculous rules in recent times.....Sonofbrowny25 wrote:helicopterking wrote:Fulham tried to use a Mispelt name from the team sheet as a technicality against Marion today .Also complained to umpires about Marion having a sub fielder and also about appealing to much.
Embarrassing if true.
surely not? that's crazy if they did
by Sonofbrowny25 » Mon Mar 25, 2019 1:11 pm
heater31 wrote:Why not? They've been ****** over several times by technicalities or ridiculous rules in recent times.....Sonofbrowny25 wrote:helicopterking wrote:Fulham tried to use a Mispelt name from the team sheet as a technicality against Marion today .Also complained to umpires about Marion having a sub fielder and also about appealing to much.
Embarrassing if true.
surely not? that's crazy if they did
by helicopterking » Mon Mar 25, 2019 1:22 pm
Sonofbrowny25 wrote:heater31 wrote:Why not? They've been ****** over several times by technicalities or ridiculous rules in recent times.....Sonofbrowny25 wrote:helicopterking wrote:Fulham tried to use a Mispelt name from the team sheet as a technicality against Marion today .Also complained to umpires about Marion having a sub fielder and also about appealing to much.
Embarrassing if true.
surely not? that's crazy if they did
I just think that its crazy to find a way out of being convincingly beaten. its not like you have lost by a run or wicket and that "mispelt name" was the wicket taker.
what have been the rules that have gone against them in recent times? (genuine question, not asking to be a smart A** )
by heater31 » Mon Mar 25, 2019 1:27 pm
helicopterking wrote:Sonofbrowny25 wrote:Why not? They've been ****** over several times by technicalities or ridiculous rules in recent times.....heater31 wrote:Sonofbrowny25 wrote:[quote="helicopterking"]Fulham tried to use a Mispelt name from the team sheet as a technicality against Marion today .Also complained to umpires about Marion having a sub fielder and also about appealing to much.
Embarrassing if true.
surely not? that's crazy if they did
I just think that its crazy to find a way out of being convincingly beaten. its not like you have lost by a run or wicket and that "mispelt name" was the wicket taker.
what have been the rules that have gone against them in recent times? (genuine question, not asking to be a smart A** )
by Down the Hill » Mon Mar 25, 2019 1:30 pm
by Senor Moto Gadili » Mon Mar 25, 2019 2:53 pm
by Trader » Mon Mar 25, 2019 3:58 pm
heater31 wrote:helicopterking wrote:My guess the T20 debarcle where they Played players that were not qualified.
That's one. They were genuine club people playing in their 2 day B grade, got called up at the last minute.
by Senor Moto Gadili » Mon Mar 25, 2019 6:12 pm
by Senor Moto Gadili » Mon Mar 25, 2019 6:48 pm
by Sonofbrowny25 » Mon Mar 25, 2019 7:44 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Congratulations to PAOC and Pooraka on making the A1 Grand Final. They have clearly been the two best teams during the minor round and proved that with dominant displays in their Semi Finals. They met way back in round 1 when Pooraka prevailed on the back of 185 from Hanson, but Princes got some revenge in the T20 final. Pooraka will be desparate to win it for their mate, but some of their boys are struggling to get through 80 overs, so I think PAOC's greater depth will allow them to prevail. Should be a cracker.
by Whatsfordinner » Mon Mar 25, 2019 9:19 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Should be a very interesting count for the A1 Cricketer of the Year, Wednesday night. I think the winner could poll as low as 12 votes and I reckon there could be a blanket finish. I'm tipping Nathan Fox from Old Scotch to take it out with 12 votes.
by Sonofbrowny25 » Mon Mar 25, 2019 10:02 pm
Whatsfordinner wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Should be a very interesting count for the A1 Cricketer of the Year, Wednesday night. I think the winner could poll as low as 12 votes and I reckon there could be a blanket finish. I'm tipping Nathan Fox from Old Scotch to take it out with 12 votes.
I think it could be a 2 horse race between Hanson and Sykes, both have had great years!
Duffett the a2 winner, with w. stanborough and Kyle adcock not far behind!
A3 is the most open by far.. Hassan from Concordia, the most consistent. But could be a tie between 5 blokes on 8-10 votes. An even competition.
by Senor Moto Gadili » Mon Mar 25, 2019 10:07 pm
Sonofbrowny25 wrote:Whatsfordinner wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Should be a very interesting count for the A1 Cricketer of the Year, Wednesday night. I think the winner could poll as low as 12 votes and I reckon there could be a blanket finish. I'm tipping Nathan Fox from Old Scotch to take it out with 12 votes.
I think it could be a 2 horse race between Hanson and Sykes, both have had great years!
Duffett the a2 winner, with w. stanborough and Kyle adcock not far behind!
A3 is the most open by far.. Hassan from Concordia, the most consistent. But could be a tie between 5 blokes on 8-10 votes. An even competition.
Umpires vote really weird so it will be interesting to see what happens with it.
by helicopterking » Mon Mar 25, 2019 10:11 pm
Whatsfordinner wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Should be a very interesting count for the A1 Cricketer of the Year, Wednesday night. I think the winner could poll as low as 12 votes and I reckon there could be a blanket finish. I'm tipping Nathan Fox from Old Scotch to take it out with 12 votes.
I think it could be a 2 horse race between Hanson and Sykes, both have had great years!
Duffett the a2 winner, with w. stanborough and Kyle adcock not far behind!
A3 is the most open by far.. Hassan from Concordia, the most consistent. But could be a tie between 5 blokes on 8-10 votes. An even competition.
by Sonofbrowny25 » Tue Mar 26, 2019 11:25 am
helicopterking wrote:Whatsfordinner wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Should be a very interesting count for the A1 Cricketer of the Year, Wednesday night. I think the winner could poll as low as 12 votes and I reckon there could be a blanket finish. I'm tipping Nathan Fox from Old Scotch to take it out with 12 votes.
I think it could be a 2 horse race between Hanson and Sykes, both have had great years!
Duffett the a2 winner, with w. stanborough and Kyle adcock not far behind!
A3 is the most open by far.. Hassan from Concordia, the most consistent. But could be a tie between 5 blokes on 8-10 votes. An even competition.
Hanson over Sykes by about 5 votes. Sykes has had a very good season, but Hanson will get up.
Duffett has had a brilliant season.
A3s could be Anyone. Nelson, Dinan-Gillman, Hassan.
by Trader » Tue Mar 26, 2019 12:05 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Should be a very interesting count for the A1 Cricketer of the Year, Wednesday night. I think the winner could poll as low as 12 votes and I reckon there could be a blanket finish. I'm tipping Nathan Fox from Old Scotch to take it out with 12 votes.
by Senor Moto Gadili » Tue Mar 26, 2019 2:30 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |