by smac » Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:09 pm
by overloaded » Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:26 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by Grahaml » Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:17 pm
by topsywaldron » Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:23 pm
smac wrote:I heard him this morning banging on about his trip to the Kukoda track and now I have read this afternoon that he had a heart operation just like Arnie! He's so brave, our Kev.
by smac » Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:27 pm
by BIG SEXY » Thu Sep 20, 2007 5:25 pm
by stan » Thu Sep 20, 2007 7:47 pm
crushinator wrote:as an employer the IR reforms have been a godsend, some time ago we had an employee who started off like a house on fire, slowly things dropped off, he turned up at 10-11 and still expected to be paid a 40 hour week, he became slow and uninterested in his job. I approahed him about it and he was very apathetic about the whole situation. i spoke to him about getting another job (knowing i couldnt just give him the ar$e) and he said no he will continue on his way as he has been. i sought legal advice from 3 different avenues, all said i had to give him 2 warnings, then if it continued, offer counselling for x months (i cant remember how many) then give him his 3rd and send him out the door. If labour get in will i be in the same situation again? im all for my employees, we get along great professionally and socially but if the time comes when one needs a boot in the bum i have to have the power to do it. Howard gives me that power, Rudd takes it away. 1 of the reasons my vote is staying with Howard and the coalition.
by Grahaml » Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:54 am
by stan » Fri Sep 21, 2007 8:23 am
Grahaml wrote:But in the current environment a good employee will just end up somewhere else and probably for more money and/or better conditions so long as they do their homework. Problem is the Unions want people to not know the facts because the unions themselves are threatened. In this case the unions have a conflict of interest but aren't owning up to it.
by Grahaml » Fri Sep 21, 2007 5:14 pm
by Leaping Lindner » Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:06 pm
by stan » Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:00 pm
Grahaml wrote:That is completely false. A good worker is valued even without qualifications. Often the unskilled worker who works his arse off all day every day is the hardest type to find.
by smac » Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:04 pm
Leaping Lindner wrote:I'm moving back to Adelaide. Sounds like a worker's paradise at the moment.
by JK » Sun Sep 23, 2007 11:57 am
smac wrote:Leaping Lindner wrote:I'm moving back to Adelaide. Sounds like a worker's paradise at the moment.
If you work hard and are good at what you do then yes, it is.
by smac » Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:14 pm
by JK » Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:13 pm
smac wrote:That extends the work hours a little, CP - I'll pay that. I could probably go home at 5 every day if it weren't for this site!
by Psyber » Sun Sep 23, 2007 3:53 pm
by redden whites » Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:26 am
crushinator wrote:as an employer the IR reforms have been a godsend, some time ago we had an employee who started off like a house on fire, slowly things dropped off, he turned up at 10-11 and still expected to be paid a 40 hour week, he became slow and uninterested in his job. I approahed him about it and he was very apathetic about the whole situation. i spoke to him about getting another job (knowing i couldnt just give him the ar$e) and he said no he will continue on his way as he has been. i sought legal advice from 3 different avenues, all said i had to give him 2 warnings, then if it continued, offer counselling for x months (i cant remember how many) then give him his 3rd and send him out the door. If labour get in will i be in the same situation again? im all for my employees, we get along great professionally and socially but if the time comes when one needs a boot in the bum i have to have the power to do it. Howard gives me that power, Rudd takes it away. 1 of the reasons my vote is staying with Howard and the coalition.
by redden whites » Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:35 am
crushinator wrote:as an employer the IR reforms have been a godsend, some time ago we had an employee who started off like a house on fire, slowly things dropped off, he turned up at 10-11 and still expected to be paid a 40 hour week, he became slow and uninterested in his job. I approahed him about it and he was very apathetic about the whole situation. i spoke to him about getting another job (knowing i couldnt just give him the ar$e) and he said no he will continue on his way as he has been. i sought legal advice from 3 different avenues, all said i had to give him 2 warnings, then if it continued, offer counselling for x months (i cant remember how many) then give him his 3rd and send him out the door. If labour get in will i be in the same situation again? im all for my employees, we get along great professionally and socially but if the time comes when one needs a boot in the bum i have to have the power to do it. Howard gives me that power, Rudd takes it away. 1 of the reasons my vote is staying with Howard and the coalition.
by mick » Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:13 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |