by Dinglinga75 » Thu Apr 21, 2022 1:28 pm
by rd » Thu Apr 21, 2022 1:58 pm
jo172 wrote:Genuinely filthy about having to vote three times in three months.
by Booney » Thu Apr 21, 2022 2:08 pm
by MW » Thu Apr 21, 2022 2:40 pm
Booney wrote:I've never seen a more disgusting snout in trough moment than this one from Chapman.
To receive the maximum parliamentary pension ( $300,984 per year ) you have to serve 20 years and 1 month.
1 month after the election Chapman resigns, triggering a by-election that could cost upwards of $700,000.
You guessed, upon announcing her retirement she'd served 20 years and 1 month. What a pig.
by Booney » Thu Apr 21, 2022 2:50 pm
MW wrote:Booney wrote:I've never seen a more disgusting snout in trough moment than this one from Chapman.
To receive the maximum parliamentary pension ( $300,984 per year ) you have to serve 20 years and 1 month.
1 month after the election Chapman resigns, triggering a by-election that could cost upwards of $700,000.
You guessed, upon announcing her retirement she'd served 20 years and 1 month. What a pig.
Hate to defend a pollie, but anyone of us would have done the same in the same situation.
by RB » Thu Apr 21, 2022 3:00 pm
Booney wrote:I've never seen a more disgusting snout in trough moment than this one from Chapman.
To receive the maximum parliamentary pension ( $300,984 per year ) you have to serve 20 years and 1 month.
1 month after the election Chapman resigns, triggering a by-election that could cost upwards of $700,000.
You guessed, upon announcing her retirement she'd served 20 years and 1 month. What a pig.
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Apr 21, 2022 9:08 pm
RB wrote:Booney wrote:I've never seen a more disgusting snout in trough moment than this one from Chapman.
To receive the maximum parliamentary pension ( $300,984 per year ) you have to serve 20 years and 1 month.
1 month after the election Chapman resigns, triggering a by-election that could cost upwards of $700,000.
You guessed, upon announcing her retirement she'd served 20 years and 1 month. What a pig.
I totally agree that she should not have run for election again without intending to serve out her term, but she was first elected on 9 February 2002, so she would already have served the 20 years and one month prior to this year's election.
by am Bays » Fri Apr 22, 2022 11:22 am
Booney wrote:I've never seen a more disgusting snout in trough moment than this one from Chapman.
To receive the maximum parliamentary pension ( $300,984 per year ) you have to serve 20 years and 1 month.
1 month after the election Chapman resigns, triggering a by-election that could cost upwards of $700,000.
You guessed, upon announcing her retirement she'd served 20 years and 1 month. What a pig.
by RB » Fri Apr 22, 2022 11:49 am
am Bays wrote:You're wrong Booney Bernard Finnegan staying on the public tit whilst facing kiddy p0rn charges will never be beaten as a snout in the trough moment and the nadir of South Australian politics. With Rann et al complicit in allowing him to stay as an MLC so if worst come to the worst they have get his vote even though he was kicked out of the party.
by jo172 » Fri Apr 22, 2022 12:24 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:RB wrote:Booney wrote:I've never seen a more disgusting snout in trough moment than this one from Chapman.
To receive the maximum parliamentary pension ( $300,984 per year ) you have to serve 20 years and 1 month.
1 month after the election Chapman resigns, triggering a by-election that could cost upwards of $700,000.
You guessed, upon announcing her retirement she'd served 20 years and 1 month. What a pig.
I totally agree that she should not have run for election again without intending to serve out her term, but she was first elected on 9 February 2002, so she would already have served the 20 years and one month prior to this year's election.
As I have said previously, she would have stayed on had they won the election.
Weatherill and Rau did the same thing but waited 9 months. It happens more oftern than not.
She's actually done the right thing - the Liberals need to get some good new people in there because they are very thin
Silly woman should have put herself up for SC like Rau did. Now that was not good!
I am surprised that Gardiner is deputy. I've never met him but he comes across as a complete doofus
by Jim05 » Wed Apr 27, 2022 7:29 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Apr 27, 2022 8:17 pm
Jim05 wrote:So for the first time ever SA gets a One Nation MP
by stan » Wed Apr 27, 2022 8:36 pm
Should be interesting in the mix of SAs mornic crop.Jim05 wrote:So for the first time ever SA gets a One Nation MP
by jo172 » Thu Apr 28, 2022 9:34 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:Jim05 wrote:So for the first time ever SA gets a One Nation MP
and Prince Russell Wortley gets to fill his pockets even more
by Dinglinga75 » Tue May 03, 2022 1:31 pm
by jo172 » Tue May 03, 2022 1:47 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Tue May 03, 2022 2:22 pm
Booney wrote:I've never seen a more disgusting snout in trough moment than this one from Chapman.
To receive the maximum parliamentary pension ( $300,984 per year ) you have to serve 20 years and 1 month.
1 month after the election Chapman resigns, triggering a by-election that could cost upwards of $700,000.
You guessed, upon announcing her retirement she'd served 20 years and 1 month. What a pig.
by RB » Tue May 03, 2022 2:55 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:RB wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Brodlach wrote:When are the final election results due?
Here is the result as of today: https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/s ... lc-results
I haven't worked out the numbers Labor have
ALP 27, LIB 16, IND 4 in the House of Assembly, and (likely) ALP 9, LIB 8, GRN 2, SAB 2, One Nation 1 in the Upper House.
Makes the President important then
They are going to do everything to lure one of the SAB or ON people
I know its not about their personal gain with these people but:
Nice salary (75% more) / car + driver / big swinging dick...........
Who's going to be tempted......
by Jimmy_041 » Tue May 03, 2022 4:35 pm
RB wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:RB wrote:
Makes the President important then
They are going to do everything to lure one of the SAB or ON people
I know its not about their personal gain with these people but:
Nice salary (75% more) / car + driver / big swinging dick...........
Who's going to be tempted......
I had fully expected this to be the case. A member of the opposition on the other hand...
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |