Now lets combine the admissions in the Advertiser piece with those in this piece
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-09/moderna-omicron-specific-vaccine-shows-promising-results/101138372First of all, these jabs should not be called a vaccine.
Show me one real vaccine:
1. That allows such a high rate of infection
2. Who's effectiveness only last 3 months
But, of course, they know this: that's why they changed the definition of "vaccine" to try to include this gear thinking no-one would notice.
You have been told that you need the boosters because of the new variants however that is not the case at all.
Only now are they admitting two things:
1. The effectiveness of the jab wanes over 3 months to the point that you need a "booster"
2. The boosters contain the same ingredients as the original jab - made for the original Wuhan strain
The narrative has consistently been that you need the boosters because of these mutated strains BUT they give you the same ingredients as the one you had first? Seriously? People believe this $hit?